Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:49:12.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changes in the distribution of copper and molybdenum after Mo administration and subsequent additional oral or intraperitoneal Cu administration to rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

H. Nederbragt
H. Nederbragt
Affiliation:
Zootechnical Institute, Department of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, State University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Male WAG/Cpb inbred rats fed on rations containing 1·5 mg copper/kg (deficient) and 6·0 mg Cu/kg (adequate) were supplemented with molybdenum (500 mg/kg diet). Starting at week 0 rats were killed weekly for up to 6 weeks and the caeruloplasmin activity of plasma, the Cu concentration of plasma, liver and kidney and the Mo concentration of liver and kidney were determined. The experiment was repeated with rats fed on diets of the same composition but given additional Cu for periods of 2 weeks. Cu was given orally by increasing dietary Cu to 6·0 mg/kg and 25·0 mg/kg for Cu-deficient and Cu-adequate rats respectively or intraperitoneally by injecting 75 μg and 250 μg every second day to Cu-deficient and Cu-adequate rats respectively.

2. After Mo administration to Cu-deficient rats plasma and kidney Cu and liver and kidney Mo increased but caeruloplasmin activity and liver Cu decreased. In Cu-adequate rats plasma, liver and kidney Cu and liver and kidney Mo increased to much higher levels than in Cu-deficient rats. Caeruloplasmin activity was not affected. Fluctuations in plasma Cu and kidney Mo were correlated closely.

3. No qualitative difference between the effect of oral or intraperitoneal Cu administered to Mo-treated Cu-deficient or Cu-adequate rats was found. In Cu-deficient Mo-supplemented rats additional Cu increased plasma Cu, caeruloplasmin activity and liver and kidney Cu and Mo. In Cu-adequate Mo-supplemented rats additional Cu decreased plasma Cu and liver and kidney Mo and increased caeruioplasmin activity and kidney Cu and, to a minor extent, liver Cu.

4. In view of the assumption that in rats a Cu, Mo and S containing compound, related to Cu-thiomolybdate, may be formed in vivo the results suggest thai Cu binds to the Mo-S part of the compound; when this compound is formed in the gastro-intestinal tract it can not be absorbed and when it is formed at systemic sites it changes the Cu distribution.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , September 1982 , pp. 353 - 364
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1982

References

REFERENCES

Bibr, B. & Lener, J. (1973). Physiol. bohemoslov. 22, 167.Google Scholar
Bremner, I. & Young, B. W. (1978). Br. J. Nutr. 39, 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Compère, R., Burny, A., Riga, A., François, E. & Vanuytrecht, S. (1965). J. Nutr. 87, 412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dick, A. T., Dewey, D. W. & Gawthorne, J. M. (1975). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 85, 567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaballah, S. S., Abood, L. G., Kapsalis, A. & Sturdivant, D. (1965). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 119, 625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawthorne, J. M. & Nader, C. J. (1976). Br. J. Nutr. 35, 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huovinen, J. A. & Gustafsson, B. E. (1967). Biochem. biophys. Acta 136, 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcilese, N. A., Ammerman, C. B., Valsecchi, R. M., Dunavant, B. G. & Davis, G. K. (1969). J. Nutr. 99, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, J., Lamand, M., Tressol, J. C. & Lab, C. (1978). Ann. Rech. vet. 9, 557.Google Scholar
Miller, R. F., Price, N. O. & Engel, R. W. (1956). J. Nutr. 60, 539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, C. F., Bremner, I., El-Gallad, T. T., Dalgarno, A. C. & Young, B. W. (1978). In Trace Element Metabolism in Man and Animals, vol. 3, p. 150 [Kirchgessner, M., editor]. Freising-Weihenstephan: Arbeitskreis Tierernährungforschung.Google Scholar
Nederbragt, H. (1980). Br. J. Nutr. 43, 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nederbragt, H. & Van den Hamer, C. J. A. (1981 a). J. inorg. Biochem. 15, 281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nederbragt, H. & Van den Hamer, C. J. A. (1981 b). J. inorg. Biochem. 15, 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosoff, B. & Spence, H. (1973). Health Phys. 25, 173.Google Scholar
Smith, B. S. W. & Wright, H. (1975). Clin. chim. Acta 62, 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suttle, N. F. (1974). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 33, 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar