Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-24T11:21:58.060Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Calorie conversion factors. An experimental reassessment of the factors used in the calculation of the energy value of human diets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

D. A. T. Southgate  and
J. V. G. A. Durnin
D. A. T. Southgate
Affiliation:
Dunn Nutritional Laboratory, University of Cambridge and Medical Research Council, Cambridge
J. V. G. A. Durnin
Affiliation:
Institute of Physiology, The University, Glasgow
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The intake and excretion of total nitrogen, fat and the various forms of carbohydrate, and the heats of combustion of the diet, urine and faeces were measured in groups of young men, young women, elderly men and elderly women.

2. Each group was studied while the subjects were eating two diets in turn, which differed in their contents of unavailable carbohydrate; the young women were also studied on a third diet which was rich in unavailable carbohydrate.

3. Increasing the intake of unavailable carbohydrate resulted in a greater faecal loss of energy, and in most instances of nitrogen and fat.

4. There was no significant effect of sex or age on the apparent digestibility of protein, fat or available carbohydrate.

5. The results are used to evaluate the use of calorie conversion factors for calculating the metabolizable energy content of mixed diets.

6. These show that for practical purposes the classical Atwater factors can be used to calculate the metabolizable energy of a diet with reasonable accuracy, provided that when available carbohydrate (as monosaccharides) values are used in the calculation a factor of 3.75 kcal/g (15.7 kJ/g) is used.

7. The studies demonstrate that the accuracy of any method for calculating the metabolizable energy of a diet is largely determined by the accuracy with which the method is capable of predicting the gross energy of the diet.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , June 1970 , pp. 517 - 535
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1970

References

Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (1950). Official Methods of Analysis 7th ed., p. 196. Washington, DC: Association of Official Agricultural Chemists.Google Scholar
Atwater, W. O. (1900). Twelfth Ann. Rep. Storrs agric. Exp. Stn p. 69.Google Scholar
Atwater, W. O. (1903). Fifteenth Ann. Rep. Storrs agric. Exp. Stn p. 123.Google Scholar
Atwater, W. O. & Bryant, A. P. (1900). Twelfth Ann. Rep. Storrs agric. Exp. Stn p. 73.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Graham, N. McC. (1955). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 14, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chibnall, A. C., Rees, M. W. & Williams, E. F. (1943). Biochem. J. 37, 354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Consolazio, C. F., Nelson, R. A., Matoush, L. O., Harding, R. S. & Conham, J. E. (1963). J. Nutr. 79, 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO(1947). Energy Yielding Components of Food and Computation of Calorie Values. Washington: F.A.O.Google Scholar
Folin, O. (1905). Am. J. Physiol. 13, 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, G. & Poulton, E. P. (1912). Q. Jl Med. 6, 82.Google Scholar
Hawk, P. B., Oser, P. L. & Summerson, W. H. (1954). Practical Physiological Chemistry 13th ed. London: J. & A. Churchill.Google Scholar
Hollingsworth, D. F. (1955). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 14, 154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, E. J. (1946). Microanalysis in Medical Biochemistry. London: J. & A. Churchill.Google Scholar
Kowalski, J. & Piekarska, J. (1957). Roczn. Państ. Zakl. Hig. 8, 557.Google Scholar
Lee, M. H. & Widdowson, E. M. (1937). Biochem. J. 31, 2035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, L. M., Bernstein, L. M. & Grossman, M. I. (1958). U.S. Army Med. Res. Nutr. Lab. Rep. no. 226.Google Scholar
McCance, R. A. & Lawrence, R. D. (1929). Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Coun. no. 135.Google Scholar
McCance, R. A., Prior, K. M. & Widdowson, E. M. (1953). Br. J. Nutr. 7, 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCance, R. A. & Widdowson, E. M. (1947). J. Hyg., Camb. 45, 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCance, R. A. & Widdowson, E. M. (1960). Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Coun. no. 297.Google Scholar
Macy, I. G. (1942). Nutrition and Chemical Growth in Childhood. Springfield, III.: C. C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Macy, I. G., Hummel, F. C. & Shepherd, M. L. (1943). Am. J. Dis. Child. 65, 195.Google Scholar
Mangold, E. (1934). Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 3, 647.Google Scholar
Maynard, L. A. (1944). J. Nutr. 28, 443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrill, A. L. & Watt, B. K. (1955). Agric. Handbk, U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 74.Google Scholar
Miller, D. S. & Payne, P. R. (1959). Br. J. Nutr. 13, 501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osmond, A. (1948). Spec. Rep. Ser. natn. Hlth med. Res. Coun., Canberra no. 2.Google Scholar
Rubner, M. (1885). Z. Biol. 21, 250.Google Scholar
Sirbu, E. R., Margen, S. & Calloway, D. H. (1967). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 20, 1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. (1926). J. biol. Chem. 68, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southgate, D. A. T. (1964). The carbohydrates in human faecal material. PhD Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Southgate, D. A. T. (1969 a). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 20, 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southgate, D. A. T. (1969 b). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 20, 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, B. K. & Merrill, A. L. (1964). Agric. Handbk, U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 8.Google Scholar
Widdowson, E. M. (1955). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 14, 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, E. M. (1960). Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Coun. no. 297, p. 153.Google Scholar