Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:18:07.600Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The biological evaluation of urea, casein and gluten in the diets of sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

H. I. Deif ,
K. El-Shazly  and
A. R. Abou Akkada
H. I. Deif
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Alexandria, Egypt, UAR
K. El-Shazly
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Alexandria, Egypt, UAR
A. R. Abou Akkada
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Alexandria, Egypt, UAR
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , September 1968 , pp. 451 - 460
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1968

References

Abou Akkada, A. R. & el-Shazly, K. (1965). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 64, 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abou Akkada, A. R. & Osman, H. El Sayed (1967). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 69, 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, I. A. & el-Shazly, K. (1960). Alex. J. agric. Res. 8, 217.Google Scholar
Allison, J. B. (1949). Adv. Protein Chem. 5, 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, J. B., Anderson, J. A. & Seely, R. D. (1946). Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 47, 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, J. B., Seely, R. D., Brown, J. H. & Ferguson, F. P. (1947). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 6, 234.Google Scholar
Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (1955). Official Methods of Analysis. Washington, D.C.: Association of Official Agricultural Chemists.Google Scholar
Chalmers, M. I. & Synge, R. L. M. (1954). Adv. Protein Chem. 9, 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chibnall, A. C., Rees, M. W. & Williams, E. F. (1943). Biochem. J. 37, 354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, R. C. & Topps, J. H. (1963). Br. J. Nutr. 17, 539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawk, P. B., Oser, B. L. & Summerson, W. H. (1952). Practical Physiological Chemistry, 12th ed., p. 564. London: J. A. Churchill.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1957). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 48, 438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loosli, J. K., Williams, H. H., Thomas, W. E., Ferris, F. H. & Maynard, L. A. (1949). Science, N. Y., 110, 144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markham, R. A. (1942). Biochem. J. 36, 790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, L. A. & Loosli, J. K. (1956). Animal Nutrition, 4th ed. New York, Toronto, London: McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc.Google Scholar
Melnick, D. & Cowgill, G. R. (1937). J. Nutr. 13, 401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, H. H. (1943). J. Anim. Sci. 2, 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagari, H., Drori, Y., Ascarelli, I. & Bondi, A. (1964). Br. J. Nutr. 18, 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar