Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:25:18.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Acute in vivo studies on glucose absorption from the small intestine of lambs, sheep and rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2012

R. G. White
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, School of Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
V. J. Williams
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, School of Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
R. J. H. Morris
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, School of Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Rates of disappearance of glucose from ligated loops of small intestine in lambs, adult sheep and young rats were studied. The concentration of glucose in the lumen decreased exponentially with time, suggesting that within a range of concentrations of 166–277 m-moles/l glucose was absorbed mainly by passive diffusion.

2. The rate of absorption of glucose from a 166 mM-solution based on either zero or first order kinetics and expressed as m-moles/m small intestine per h decreased along the intestine from the duodenum to the ileum in lambs and rats. The decrease was slight in adult sheep.

3. The total absorptive capacity of the small intestine of adult grazing sheep for glucose from 166 mM-solutions (06 m-moles/kg body-weight per h) was approximately 25% of that for lambs less than 1 week of age.

4. Young rats had a greater absorptive capacity of the small intestine (12.9m-moles/kg body-weight per h) than adult sheep of about 40 kg body-weight (0.6 m-moles/kg body-weight per h) and this largely reflected a longer small intestine per unit body-weight.

5. The absorptive capacity of lambs for glucose was greater when the level of voluntary lactose intake was increased before an experiment. The absorptive capacity of the ileum of adult sheep given wheat was greater than that of grazing adult sheep.

6. Developmental changes in glucose absorption are discussed in relation to normal changes in diet and to changes in the morphology of the small intestine with age.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1971

References

REFERENCES

Annegers, J. H. (1964). Am. J. Physiol. 206, 1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bárány, E. & Sperber, E. (1941). Ark. Zool. 34, I.Google Scholar
Corbett, J. L. (1968). Aust. J. agric. Res. 19, 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, A. J. & Jussila, R. (1955). Gastroenterology 29, 982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, H. L. (1963). Aust. J. agric. Res. 14, 824.Google Scholar
Faltová, E., Hahn, P. & Koldovský, O. (1962). (Fiziol. Zh. SSSR 48) Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. (Trans. Suppl.) 22, T941.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. B. & Parsons, D. S. (1950). J. Anat. 84, 272.Google Scholar
Heald, P. J. (1951). Br. J. Nutr. 5, 84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, J. T., Rifkin, R. J. & Keith, J. M. (1964). J. Dairy Sci. 47, 789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huggett, A., St, G. & Nixon, D. A. (1956). Biochem. J. 66, 12P.Google Scholar
Koldovský, O., Faltov´, E., Hahn, P. & Vacek, Z. (1961). In The Development of Homeostasis p. 155. Symposium Chairman, E. F. Adolf. Publishing House, Czechoslovak Acad. Sci. Prague.Google Scholar
Koldovský, O., Hahn, P. & Jiránek, J. (1958). Cslká Physiol. 17, 491. Quoted by Koldovský et al. (1961).Google Scholar
MacRae, J. C. & Armstrong, D. G. (1966). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 25, xxxiii.Google Scholar
MacRae, J. C. & Armstrong, D. G. (1969). Br. J. Nutr. 23, 377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClymont, G. L. (1951). Aust. J. agric. Res. 2, 92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magee, H. E. & Reid, E. (1931). J. Physiol., Lond. 73, 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mylrea, P. J. (1966). Res. vet. Sci. 7, 394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, J. W. G. & Sutton, J. D. (1969). Br. J. Nutr. 23, 585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Frazer, C. & Kay, R. N. B. (1969). Br. J. Nutr. 23, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, A. W. (1934). Aust. J. exp. Biol. med. Sci. 12, 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, E. W. (1900). Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 192, 211.Google Scholar
Schambye, P. (1951 a). Nord. VetMed. 3, 555.Google Scholar
Schambye, P. (1951 b). Nord. VetMed. 3, 748.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1956). Statistical Methods. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State College Press.Google Scholar
Topps, J. H., Kay, R. N. B. & Goodall, E. D. (1968). Br. J. Nutr. 22, 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, D. M. & Faichney, G. J. (1964). Br. J. Nutr. 18, 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, R. (1939). Anat. Rec. 75, 427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weller, R. A. & Gray, F. V. (1954). J. exp. Biol. 31, 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, R. G. (1967). Absorption of glucose from the small intestine of sheep. M Rur Sc. Thesis, University of New England, Australia.Google Scholar
Wilbrandt, W. & Rosenberg, T. (1961). Pharmac. Rev. 13, 109.Google Scholar
Wood, H. O. (1944). J. Anat. 78, 103.Google Scholar