Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T01:34:32.783Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Activity pattern and energy expenditure due to physical activity before and during pregnancy in healthy Swedish women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2007

Marie Lof  and
Elisabet Forsum
Marie Lof
Affiliation:
Division of Nutrition, Department of Biomedicine and Surgery, University of Linkoping, SE-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
Elisabet Forsum*
Affiliation:
Division of Nutrition, Department of Biomedicine and Surgery, University of Linkoping, SE-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
*
*corresponding author: author: Dr Elisabet Forsum, fax +46 13 224740, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Human pregnancy is associated with increased requirements for dietary energy and this increase may be partly offset by reductions in physical activity during gestation. Studies in well-nourished women have shown that the physical activity level (PAL), obtained as the total energy expenditure (TEE) divided by the BMR, decreases in late pregnancy. However, it is not known if this decrease is really caused by reductions in physical activity or if it is the result of decreases in energy expenditure/BMR (the so-called metabolic equivalent, MET) for many activities in late pregnancy. In the present study activity pattern, TEE and BMR were assessed in twenty-three healthy Swedish women before pregnancy as well as in gestational weeks 14 and 32. Activity pattern was assessed using a questionnaire and heart rate recording. TEE was assessed using the doubly labelled water method and BMR was measured by means of indirect calorimetry. When compared to the pre-pregnant value, there was little change in the PAL in gestational week 14 but it was significantly reduced in gestational week 32. Results obtained by means of the questionnaire and by heart rate recording showed that the activity pattern was largely unaffected by pregnancy. The findings support the following conclusion: in a population of well-nourished women where the activity pattern is maintained during pregnancy, the increase in BMR represents approximately the main part of the pregnancy-induced increase in TEE, at least until gestational week 32.

Keywords

Activity patternDoubly labelled waterPhysical activity levelPregnancy
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 95 , Issue 2 , February 2006 , pp. 296 - 302
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2006

References

Ainsworth, B, Haskell, W, Leon, Aet al.. Compendium of physical activities: classification of energy costs of human physical activities Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993 25 71–80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Black, A, Prentice, A & Coward, WUse of food quotients to predict respiratory quotients for the doubly-labelled water method of measuring energy expenditure. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr 1986 40C 381–391Google Scholar
Butte, N, Treuth, M, Mehta, N, Wong, W, Hopkinson, J & Smith, EEnergy requirements of women of reproductive age. Am J Clin Nutr 2003 77 630–638CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butte, N, Wong, W, Treuth, M, Ellis, K & Smith, EEnergy requirements during pregnancy based on total energy expenditure and energy deposition. Am J Clin Nutr 2004 79 1078–1087CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coward, WThe doubly-labelled-water (2H218O) method: principles and practice. Proc Nutr Soc 1988 47 209–218CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Weir, JBVNew method for calculating metabolic rate with special reference to protein metabolism J Physiol 1949 109 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization FAO/WHO/UNU expert consultation report on human energy requirements. Interim report. http://ftp.fao.org/es/esn/nutrition/ human_energy_requirements.pdf 2004 77–90Google Scholar
Food and Nutrition Board and Institute of Medicine Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acidscholesterol, protein and amino acids (macronutrients) 2002 864–867Google Scholar
Forsum, E, Kabir, N, Sadurskis, A & Westerterp, KR) Total energy expenditure of healthy Swedish women during pregnancy and lactation. Am J Clin Nutr 1992 56 334–342CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, G, Prentice, A, Coward, Wet al.. Longitudinal assessment of the components of energy balance in well-nourished lactating women Am J Clin Nut 1991 54 788–798CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, G, Prentice, A, Coward, Wet al.. Longitudinal assessment of energy expenditure in pregnancy by the doubly labelled water method. Am J Clin Nutr 1993 57 494–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassard, TUnderstanding Biostatistics. St Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book. 1991Google Scholar
Institute of Medicine Part I: weight gain. In Nutrition During Pregnancy Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 1990 1–23Google Scholar
International Obesity Task Force Body mass index distribution:age-standardised proportions of selected categories in MONICA populations age 35–65 years, data collected 1983–86. 2004Google Scholar
Jörgensen, CFetometri och graviditetsbestämning. In Obsteriskt ultraljud, In: VästeråsVästra Aros tryckeri AB 1997 37–44Google Scholar
Kopp-Hoolihan, L, van Loan, M, Wong, W & King, JLongitudinal assessment of energy balance in well-nourished pregnant women Am J Clin Nutr 1999 69 697–704CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lof, M & Forsum, EHydration of fat-free mass in healthy women with special reference to the effect of pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr 2004 80 960–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lof, M, Hannestad, U & Forsum, EComparison of commonly used procedures, including the doubly-labelled water technique, in the estimation of total energy expenditure of women with special reference to the significance of body fatness. Br J Nutr 2003 90 961–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Board of Health and Welfare Yearbook of Health and Medical Care. Stockholm: Ekonomi-Print 2002Google Scholar
Pivarnik, J, Stein, A & Rivera, JEffect of pregnancy on heart rate/oxygen consumption calibration curves. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002 34 750–755CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prentice, A, Spaaij, C, Goldberg, Get al.. Energy requirements of pregnant and lactating women. Eur J Clin Nutr 1996 50 S82–S111Google ScholarPubMed
Sohlstrom, A & Forsum, EChanges in adipose tissue volume and distribution during reproduction in Swedish women as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Clin Nutr 1995 61 287–295CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thielecke, F & Noack, REvaluation of an automated equilibration technique for deuterium/hydrogen isotope ratio measurements with respect to assessing total energy expenditure by the doubly labelled water method. J Mass Spectrom 1997 32 323–3273.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization Energy and Protein Requirements Report of a Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation. Technical Report Series no. 724. Geneva: WHO 1985Google Scholar