Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T20:27:26.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The absorption of plant sterols by the fowl*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

K. Neil Boorman  and
Fisher Hans
K. Neil Boorman
Affiliation:
Nutrition Laboratory, Department of Animal Sciences, Rutgers—The State University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
Fisher Hans
Affiliation:
Nutrition Laboratory, Department of Animal Sciences, Rutgers—The State University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. A gas-liquid chromatographic method for the detection of phytosterols in tissues and excreta of birds was developed. The limitations of this method are discussed. 2. β- and γ-Sitosterol werc detected in the plasma of adult cockerels and in the plasma, intestinal wall, and liver of 4-week-old cockerels. The proportion of sitosterols in the total sterol absorbed appeared to be affected by the nature of the dietary fat. 3. γ-Sitosterol was more effectively absorbed than β-sitosterol. The ratio of β to γ was altered by the nature of the dietary fat. 4. Using a diet containing 10% triolein and 1% cholic acid, and increasing the dietary plant sterol level up to 2%, increased the proportion of sitosterols in the intestinal wall of 4-week-old cocks. Further increases in dietary plant sterols did not produce additional increases in the proportion of sitosterols among intestinal wall sterols. 5. γ-Sitosterol and traces of β-sitosterol were found in eggs from hens given a diet supplemented with maize stcrols.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , December 1966 , pp. 689 - 701
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1966

References

Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (1960). Official Methods of Analysis, 9th ed., Method 26,054. Washington, DC: Association of Official Agricultural Chemists.Google Scholar
Beher, W., Baker, D. & Anthony, W. L. (1957). Circulation Res. 5, 202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berge, K. G., Achor, R. W. P., Barker, N. W. & Power, M. H. (1959). Am. Heart. J. 58, 849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beveridge, J. M. R., Connell, W. F., Mayer, G. A. & Haust, H. L. (1958). Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 36, 895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, G. L. & Costello, R. L. (1956). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 91, 52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunham, L. W., Fortner, R. E., Moore, R. D., Culp, H. W. & Rice, C. N. (1959). Archs Biochem. Biophys. 82, 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, H. M. Jr, Marion, J. E. & Driggers, J. C. (1960). Poult. Sci. 39, 1247.Google Scholar
Eisner, J. & Firestone, D. (1963). J. Ass. off. agric. Chem. 46, 542.Google Scholar
Fisher, H. & Kaunitz, H. (1964). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 116, 278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, H., Weiss, H. S. & Griminger, P. (1963). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 113, 425.Google Scholar
Gerson, T., Shorland, F. B. & Adams, Y. (1961). Biochem. J. 81, 584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, R. G. (1954). Circulation 10, 589.Google Scholar
Gould, R. G. (1955–1956). Trans. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 18, 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, R. G., Lotz, L. V. & Lilly, E. M. (1955). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 14, 487.Google Scholar
Hermann, R. C. (1959). Circulation Res. 7, 224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernandez, H. M., Peterson, D. W., Chaikoff, I. L. & Dauben, W. G. (1953). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 83, 498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivy, A. C., Tsung-Min, L. & Karvinen, E. (1954). Am. J. Physiol. 179, 646.Google Scholar
Kuksis, A. & Huang, T. C. (1962). Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 40, 1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, D. W. (1951). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 78, 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searcy, R. L. & Bergquist, L. M. (1960). Clinica chim. Acta 5, 192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönheimer, R. (1929). Z. Physiol. Chem. 180, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swell, L., Boiter, T. A., Field, H. Jr & Treadwell, C. R. (1954). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 86, 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swell, L., Boiter, T. A., Field, H. Jr & Treadwell, C. R. (1956). J. Nutr. 58, 385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swell, L., Trout, E. C. Jr, Field, H. Jr & Treadwell, C. R. (1959). J. biol. Chem. 234, 2286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summers, J. D. & Fisher, H. (1961). J. Nutr. 75, 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werbin, H., Chaikoff, I. L. & Jones, E. E. (1960). J. biol. Chem. 235, 1629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zlatkis, A., Zak, B. & Boyle, A. J. (1953). J. Lab. clin. Med. 41, 486.Google Scholar