Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:34:45.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Absorption kinetics of dietary hydrolysis products in conscious pigs given diets with different amounts of fish protein

1. Amino-nitrogen and glucose

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

A. Rérat ,
P. Vaissade  and
P. Vaugelade
A. Rérat
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Physiologie de la Nutrition, INRA, Centre de Recherches de Jouy-en-Josas, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France
P. Vaissade
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Physiologie de la Nutrition, INRA, Centre de Recherches de Jouy-en-Josas, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France
P. Vaugelade
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Physiologie de la Nutrition, INRA, Centre de Recherches de Jouy-en-Josas, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Concentrations of amino-nitrogen, glucose, reducing sugars and lactic acid in blood obtained from arterial and portal permanent catheters were measured together with the portal hepatic blood flow-rate during a post-prandial period of 8 h in twenty unanaesthetized pigs (initial mean body-weight 52·3 (SEM 0·9) kg) receiving experimental meals (200–1000 g) at 3–4 d intervals from 6–8 to 20 d after surgical implantation of the catheters and electromagnetic flow probe. The semi-synthetic starch-based diets contained variable amounts of fish meal giving crude protein (nitrogen x 6·25; CP) concentrations (g CP/kg) of 80 (seven meals), 120 (twenty-two meals), 160 (six meals) and 240 (nine meals).

2. After the meal the concentration of amino-N increased with increasing levels of protein intake and increased more in the portal than in the arterial blood. There were significant relations between amounts of amino-N appearing in the portal blood at various time-intervals after the meal and the level of protein intake. Values for the ratio, amount absorbed within 8 h: amount ingested (absorption coefficient: 0·633 for a mean intake of 13·4 g N) decreased with increasing level of protein intake.

3. There was a rise in glycaemia after the meal, increasing with the amount of carbohydrate eaten, and this was more marked in the portal than in the arterial blood. There were also significant relations between amounts of glucose absorbed and amounts of starch ingested. However, the appearance of glucose in the portal blood was less marked than that of amino-N since the absorption coefficient within 8 h was lower (0·504 for a mean intake of 291 g reducing sugars). This was most probably due to a larger uptake of glucose by the intestinal cell wall.

4. Amounts of lactic acid appearing in the portal vein during the post-prandial period did not depend on amounts ingested; they ranged from 3 to 1·6 g/h from the 1st to the 8th hour after the meal.

Type
General Nutrition Papers
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 60 , Issue 1 , July 1988 , pp. 91 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1988

References

Agricultural Research Council (1967). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock, no. 3, Technical Reviews. London: Agricultural Research Council.Google Scholar
Aumaitre, A., Rérat, A., Vaissade, P. & Vaugelade, P. (1975). Annales de Biologie Animale, Biochimie, Biophysique 15, 547–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuber, J. C. & Laplace, J. P. (1979). Annales de Zootechnie 28, 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darcy, B., Laplace, J. P. & Duée, P. H. (1982). Annales de Zootechnie 31, 279–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, Y. & Rérat, A. (1964). Annales de Biologie Animale. Biochimie, Biophysique 4, 263–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, J. B. & Kessler, G. (1961). Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 57, 970–990.Google Scholar
Hoffman, S. W. (1937). Journal of Biological Chemistry 120, 511–555.Google Scholar
Laplace, J. P., Pons, O. & Simon, P. (1983). Annales de Zootechnie 32, 507–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, H. N. (1949). Journal of Nutrition 39, 375–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, D. W. & Peters, R. (1965). Automation in Analytical Chemistry. Technicon Symposium, New York, pp. 324–327. Tassy-Torson, New York: Technicon Instruments Corp.Google Scholar
Rérat, A. (1971). Annales de Biologie Animale, Biochimie, Biophysique 11, 277–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rérat, A. (1981). Bulletin de l'Académie Nationale de Méadecine (Paris) 165, 1131–1137.Google Scholar
Rérat, A. (1982). In Digestive Physiology in the Pig. Colloques de l'INRA no. 12, pp. 63–85 [Laplace, J. P. and Corring, T., Rérat, A. editors]. Paris: Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique.Google Scholar
Rérat, A., Chayvialle, J. A., Kandé, J., Vaissade, P., Vaugelade, P. & Bourrier, T. (1985). Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 63, 1547–1559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rérat, A., Jung, J. & Kandé, J. (1988). British Journal of Nutrition 60, 105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rérat, A., Vaissade, P. & Vaugelade, P. (1979). Annales de Biologie Animale, Biochimie, Biophysique 19, 739–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rérat, A., Vaissade, P. & Vaugelade, P. (1984 a). British Journal of Nutrition 51, 505–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rérat, A., Vaissade, P. & Vaugelade, P. (1984 b). British Journal of Nutrition 51, 517–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rérat, A., Vaugelade, P. & Villiers, P. (1980). In Current Concepts of Digestion and Absorption in Pigs, Technical Bulletin no. 3, pp. 177–216 [Low, A. G. and Partridge, I. G., editors]. Reading/Ayr: National Institute for Research in Dairying/Hannah Research Institute.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G. (1967). Statistical Methods. Ames, Iowa: Iowa University Press.Google Scholar