Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:32:37.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The absorption, distribution and excretion of labelled copper in young pigs given different quantities, as sulphate or sulphide, orally or intravenously

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

J. P. Bowland ,
R. Braode ,
A. G. Chamberlain ,
R. F. Glascock  and
K. G. Mitchell
J. P. Bowland
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinjield, Reading
R. Braode
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinjield, Reading
A. G. Chamberlain
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinjield, Reading
R. F. Glascock
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinjield, Reading
K. G. Mitchell
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinjield, Reading
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , February 1961 , pp. 59 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1961

References

Andrus, S. (1955). Analyst, 80, 514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous (1959). Rep. nat. Inst. Dairy., Reading, p. 28.Google Scholar
Barber, R. S., Braude, R., Mitchell, K. G. & Cassidy, J. (1955). Chem. & Ind. p. 601.Google Scholar
Barber, R. S., Braude, R., Mitchell, K. G. & Porter, J. W. G. (1960). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 19, xxvi.Google Scholar
Braude, R. & Mitchell, K. G. (1951). Agriculture, Lond., 57, 501.Google Scholar
Bush, J. A., Mahoney, J. P., Gubler, C. J., Cartwright, G. E. & Wintrobe, M. M. (1956). J. Lab. clin. Med. 47, 898.Google Scholar
Bush, J. A., Mahoney, J. P., Markowitz, H., Gubler, C. J., Cartwright, G. E. & Wintrobe, M. M. (1955). J. clin. Invest. 34, 1766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carle, B. N. & Dewhirst, W. H. (1942). J. Amer. vet. med. Ass. 101, 495.Google Scholar
Cassidy, J. & Eva, J. K. (1958). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 17, xxx.Google Scholar
Comar, C. L., Davis, G. K. & Singer, L. (1948). J. biol. Chem. 174, 905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dukes, H. H. (1947). The Physiology of Domestic Animals, 6th ed. Ithaca, N.Y.: Comstock Publishing Co. Inc.Google Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. (1940). J. agric. Sci. 30, 276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, J. P., Bush, J. A., Gubler, C. J., Moretz, W. H., Cartwright, G. E. & Wintrobe, M. M. (1955). J. Lab. clin. Med. 46, 702.Google Scholar
Moustgaard, J. & Højgaard Olsen, N. J. (1951). Nord. VetMed. 3, 763.Google Scholar
Pillemer, L. & Hutchinson, M. C. (1945). J. biol. Chem. 158, 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, E. (1957). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. Sect. A, 38, 1091.Google Scholar