Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:07:04.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Absorption and secretion of 65Zn in the stomach and intestinal tract of sheep exchanging digesta via duodenal re-entrant cannulas*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

M. Ivan
Affiliation:
Animal Research Centre, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A OC6, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The absorption and secretion of 65Zn in the stomach and intestinal tract regions was studied in sets of two and three sheep which were exchanging digesta via re-entrant cannulas in the proximal duodenum. One sheep from each of the three three-sheep sets was dosed intraruminally with the radioisotope. One sheep from the three two-sheep sets received an intravenous dose.

2. Measurements of 65Zn in blood plasma from intraruminally dosed sheep showed that there was no apparent absorption from the stomach region. Measurements from sheep receiving radioactive digesta intraduodenally showed that mean apparent absorption of 65Zn was 0.07 and mean true absorption was 0.103. There was a large variation in endogenous recycling of 65Zn into the stomach region.

3. Secretion of 65Zn into the stomach and intestinal regions in the intravenously dosed sheep of the two-sheep sets was calculated on the basis of total recovery over 10 d in the digesta and faeces. The present study showed that for every 1 molecule Zn secreted into the stomach region, 2.1 molecules were secreted into the intestinal tract region.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1987

References

REFERENCES

Arora, S. P., Hatfield, E. E., Garrigus, U. S., Lohman, T. G. & Doane, B. B. (1969). Journal of Nutrition 97, 2528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertoni, G., Watson, M. J., Savage, G. P. & Armstrong, D. G. (1976). Zootecnica e Nutrizione Animale 2, 185191.Google Scholar
Grace, N. D. (1975). British Journal of Nutrition 34, 7382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grace, N. D. & Gooden, J. M. (1980). New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 293298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiers, J. M., Miller, W. J. & Blackmon, D. M. (1968). Journal of Dairy Science 51, 730736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivan, M. (1979). Canadian Journal of Animal Science 59, 283289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivan, M., Buckley, D. J., St. Amour, G., Nicholls, C. F. & Veira, D. M. (1985). Journal of Animal Science 60, 13591366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivan, M. & Grieve, C. M. (1976). Journal of Dairy Science 59, 17641768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivan, M. & Hidiroglou, M. (1980). Canadian Journal of Animal Science 60, 539541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivan, M., Ihnat, M. & Hidiroglou, M. (1979). Canadian Journal of Animal Science 59, 273281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivan, M., Ihnat, M. & eira, D. M. (1983). Canadian Journal of Animal Science 63, 163171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivan, M. & Johnston, D. W. (1981). Journal of Animal Science 52, 849856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivan, M. & Lamand, M. (1981). Annals of Veterinary Research 12, 337344.Google Scholar
Ivan, M., Lamand, M., Kelleher, C. A. & Mason, J. (1981). Annals of Veterinary Research 12, 379383.Google Scholar
Kelleher, C. A., Ivan, M., Lamand, M. & Mason, J. (1983). Journal of Comparative Pathology 93, 8392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, W. J., Blackmon, D. M., Powell, G. W., Gentry, R. P. & Hiers, J. M. (1966). Journal of Nutrition 90, 335341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stake, P. E., Miller, W. J., Blackmon, D. M., Gentry, R. P. & Neathery, M. W. (1974). Journal of Nutrition 104, 12791284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, M. H. & Unsworth, E. F. (1978). British Journal of Nutrition 40, 491496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suttle, N. F., Davis, H. L. & Field, A. C. (1982). British Journal of Nutrition 47, 105112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weston, R. H. & Kastelic, J. (1967). Australian Journal of Biological Science 20, 975981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar