Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:11:10.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Teacher and student perspectives on one-to-one pedagogy: practices and possibilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2014

Gemma Carey  and
Catherine Grant
Gemma Carey
Affiliation:
Queensland Conservatorium, Griffith University, PO Box 3428 South Bank, Q [email protected]; [email protected]
Catherine Grant
Affiliation:
Queensland Conservatorium, Griffith University, PO Box 3428 South Bank, Q [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explores teachers’ and students’ perceptions of one-to-one pedagogy, in the context of tertiary vocal and instrumental tuition. Teachers and students at one Australian conservatoire participated in interviews and focus groups that explored their experiences and perceptions on the nature, value, effectiveness and challenges of one-to-one learning and teaching. Four key themes emerged: customising teaching to the learner, the teacher–student relationship, negotiating issues of student dependency versus self-sufficiency, and situating one-to-one in a broader institutional context. Aside from an undisputed view that one-to-one is essential to students’ learning and development, findings indicate diverse perceptions, including discrepancies between intentions of teachers and their pedagogical practice, and between teacher practice and student expectations. By drawing on voices ‘from the inside’ to characterise one-to-one practice, the study contributes to evidence-based research about learning and teaching in the conservatoire environment.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Music Education , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , March 2015 , pp. 5 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ASSOCIATION OF EUROPEAN CONSERVATOIRES (2010) Quality Assurance and Accreditation in Higher Music Education. Amsterdam: Association of European Conservatoires.Google Scholar
BURT, R. & MILLS, J. (2006) Taking the plunge: the hopes and fears of students as they begin music college. British Journal of Music Education, 23, 51–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BURWELL, K. (2005) A degree of independence: teachers’ approaches to instrumental tuition in a university college. British Journal of Music Education, 22, 199–215.Google Scholar
BURWELL, K. (2006) On musicians and singers: an investigation of different approaches taken by vocal and instrumental teachers in higher education. Music Education Research, 8, 331–347.Google Scholar
CAREY, G. (2008) New Understanding of ‘Relevant’ Keyboard Pedagogy in Tertiary Institutions. Saarbrucken: Verlag Dr. Muller (VDM).Google Scholar
CAREY, G. (2010) Too much performing, too little learning? Reflections on pedagogical practices within the Conservatoire. Paper presented at the 18th International Seminar of the Commission for the Education of the Professional Musician (CEPROM), 27–30 July. International Society for Music Education (ISME), Nedlands, Western Australia.Google Scholar
CAREY, G., LEBLER, D. & GALL, S. (2012) Investigating the one-to-one teaching model in higher music education: developing a collaborative model of inquiry. Scientia Paedagogica Experimentali: International Journal of Experimental Research in Education, 47, 175–198.Google Scholar
CREECH, A., & HALLAM, S. (2010) Interpersonal interaction within the violin teaching studio: the influence of interpersonal dynamics on outcomes for teachers. Psychology of Music, 38, 403–421.Google Scholar
CREECH, A., GAUNT, H., HALLAM, S. & ROBERTSON, L. (2009) Conservatoire students’ perceptions of master classes. British Journal of Music Education, 26, 315–331.Google Scholar
FROELICH, H. (2002) Thoughts on schools of music and colleges of education as places of ‘rites and rituals’: consequences for research on practising. In Hanken, I. M., Nielsen, S. G. & Nerland, M. (Eds.), Research in and for Higher Music Education (pp. 149–165). Oslo: Norges Musikkhogskole.Google Scholar
GAUNT, H. (2008) One-to-one tuition in a conservatoire: the perceptions of instrumental and vocal teachers. Psychology of Music, 36, 215–245.Google Scholar
GAUNT, H. (2010) One-to-one tuition in a conservatoire: the perceptions of instrumental and vocal students. Psychology of Music, 38, 178–208.Google Scholar
GAUNT, H. (2011) Understanding the one-to-one relationship in instrumental/vocal tuition in Higher Education: comparing student and teacher perceptions. British Journal of Music Education, 28, 159–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GAUNT, H., CREECH, A., LONG, M. & HALLAM, S. (2012) Supporting conservatoire students towards professional integration: one-to-one tuition and the potential of mentoring. Music Education Research, 14, 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HALLAM, R. (2011) Effective partnership working in music education: principles and practice. International Journal of Music Education, 29, 155–171.Google Scholar
HARRISON, S. (1997) Submission to the review of higher education financing and policy. Review of Higher Education Financing and Policy – Submissions. http://www.pc.gov.au/ic/research/submission/highered/ [Accessed 9 August 2012]Google Scholar
HARRISON, S. D. (2004) Lifelong learning in music education: A brief examination. In Roebuck, D., Searle, J. & McKavanagh, C. (Eds.), Doing, Thinking, Activity, Learning: Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Post-compulsory Education and Training 1 (pp. 204–208). Brisbane: Australian Academic Press.Google Scholar
JUUTI, S. & LITTLETON, K. (2010) Musical identities in transition: solo-piano students’ accounts of entering the academy. Psychology of Music, 38, 481–497.Google Scholar
KENNELL, R. (1997) Teaching music one on one: a case study. Dialogue in Instrumental Music Education, 21, 69–81.Google Scholar
KENNELL, R. (2002) Systematic research in studio instruction in music. In Colwell, R. & Richardson, C. (Eds.), The New Handbook of Research on Music Teaching and Learning (pp. 243–256). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
LEBLER, D. (2008). Popular music pedagogy: peer-learning in practice. Music Education Research, 10, 193–213.Google Scholar
LOCKETT, D. R. (2007) The scholar/performer: a new dimension in music research. In Proceedings of the 8th Australasian Piano Pedagogy Conference, 2–6 July 2007. Canberra: Australian National University. http://www.appca.com.au/2007proceedings.php [Accessed 12 July 2012]Google Scholar
LONG, M., CREECH, A., GAUNT, H., HALLAM, S. & ROBERTSON, L. (2012). Blast from the past: Conservatoire students’ experiences and perceptions of public master classes. Musicae Scientiae, 16, 286–306.Google Scholar
MAZE, J. (2012) Fighting huge cuts at ANU. Advocate: Journal of the National Tertiary Education Union, 19, 2, 7.Google Scholar
MILLS, J. (2002) Conservatoire students’ perceptions of the characteristics of effective instrumental and vocal tuition. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 153/154, 78–82.Google Scholar
MILLS, J. & SMITH, J. (2003) Teachers’ beliefs about effective instrumental teaching in schools and higher education. British Journal of Music Education, 20, 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MUSIC COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA (2011) Higher Education Base Funding Review: Submission to the Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. http://www.mca.org.au/advocacy/2011-papers/16319-higher-education-base-funding-review [Accessed 7 September 2012]Google Scholar
PERSSON, R. (1994) Concert musicians as teachers: on good intentions falling short. European Journal for High Ability, 5, 79–91.Google Scholar
PERSSON, R. (1996) Brilliant performers as teachers: a case study of commonsense teaching in a conservatoire setting. International Journal of Music Education, 28, 25–36.Google Scholar
POLIFONIA WORKING GROUP FOR INSTRUMENTAL AND VOCAL MUSIC TEACHER TRAINING (2010). Instrumental and Vocal Teacher Education: European Perspectives [handbook]. Utrecht: AEC.Google Scholar
PRESLAND, C. (2005) Conservatoire student and instrumental professor: the student perspective on a complex relationship. British Journal of Music Education, 22, 237–248.Google Scholar
PURSER, D. (2005) Performers as teachers: exploring the teaching approaches of instrumental teachers in conservatoires. British Journal of Music Education, 22, 287–298.Google Scholar
SCHMIDT, C. P. (1989) Individual differences in perception of applied music teaching feedback. Psychology of Music, 17, 110–112.Google Scholar
WÖLLNER, C. & GINSBORG, J. (2011). Team teaching in the conservatoire: the views of music performance staff and students. British Journal of Music Education, 28, 301–323.Google Scholar