Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:04:21.558Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Craft, process and art: Teaching and learning music composition in higher education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2010

Mandy Lupton  and
Christine Bruce
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explores models of teaching and learning music composition in higher education. It analyses the pedagogical approaches apparent in the literature on teaching and learning composition in schools and universities, and introduces a teaching model as: learning from the masters; mastery of techniques; exploring ideas; and developing voice. It then presents a learning model developed from a qualitative study into students’ experiences of learning composition at university as: craft, process and art. The relationship between the students’ experiences and the pedagogical model is examined. Finally, the implications for composition curricula in higher education are presented.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Music Education , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , November 2010 , pp. 271 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ÅKERLIND, G. (2005) ‘Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods’, Higher Education Research & Development, 24, 321–334.Google Scholar
BARRETT, M. (2003) ‘Freedoms and constraints: Constructing musical worlds through the dialogue of composition’, in Hickey, M. (Eds), Why and How Teach Music Composition: A New Horizon for Music Education (pp. 3–27). Reston, VA: The National Association for Music Education.Google Scholar
BARRETT, M. (2006) ‘‘Creative collaboration’: An ‘eminence’ study of teaching and learning in music composition’, Psychology of Music, 34, 195–218.Google Scholar
BARRETT, M. & GROMKO, J. (2007) ‘Provoking the muse: A case study of teaching and learning in music composition’, Psychology of Music, 35, 213–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BECK, J. (2001) ‘Discovering the composer within’, Teaching Music, 8, 54–57.Google Scholar
BERKLEY, R. (2001) ‘Why is teaching composing so challenging? A survey of classroom observation and teachers’ opinions’, British Journal of Music Education, 18, 119–138.Google Scholar
BERKLEY, R. (2004) ‘Teaching composing as creative problem solving: Conceptualising composing pedagogy’, British Journal of Music Education, 21, 239–263.Google Scholar
BOLDEN, B. (2009) ‘Teaching music composition in secondary school: A case study analysis’, British Journal of Music Education, 26, 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BOWDEN, J. A. & GREEN, P. (Eds) (2005) Doing Developmental Phenomenography. Melbourne: RMIT University Press.Google Scholar
BRINDLE, R. S. (1986) Musical Composition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
BUNTING, R. (1988) ‘Composing music: Case studies in the teaching and learning process’, British Journal of Music Education, 5, 269–310.Google Scholar
BURNARD, P. (1995) ‘Task design and experience in composition’, Research Studies in Music Education, 5, 32–46.Google Scholar
BURNARD, P. & YOUNKER, B. (2002) ‘Mapping pathways: Fostering creativity in composition’, Music Education Research, 4, 245–246.Google Scholar
BURNARD, P. & YOUNKER, B. (2004) ‘Problem-solving and creativity: Insights from students’ individual composing pathways’, International Journal of Music Education, 22, 59–76.Google Scholar
BURNARD, P. & YOUNKER, B. (2008) ‘Investigating children's musical interactions within the activities systems of group composing and arranging: An application of Engestrom's Activity Theory’, International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 60–74.Google Scholar
BYRNE, C., MACDONALD, R. & CARLTON, L. (2003) ‘Assessing creativity in musical compositions: Flow as an assessment tool’, British Journal of Music Education, 20, 277–290.Google Scholar
CARBON, J. (1986) ‘Toward a pedagogy of composition: Exploring creative potential’, College Music Symposium, 26.Google Scholar
COLLINS, D. (2005) ‘A synthesis process model of creative thinking in music composition’, Psychology of Music, 33, 193–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COPE, D. (1997) Techniques of the Contemporary Composer. Australia: Schirmer.Google Scholar
COULTER, J. (2005) ‘Sound Composition course outline’, Griffith University.Google Scholar
DENSON, L. (2005) ‘Jazz Composition course outline’, Griffith University.Google Scholar
DOGANI, K. (2004) ‘Teachers’ understanding of composing in the primary classroom’, Music Education Research, 6, 263–279.Google Scholar
EMMERSON, S. (1989) ‘Composing strategies and pedagogy’, Contemporary Music Review, 3, 133–144.Google Scholar
FAULKNER, R. (2003) ‘Group composing: Pupil perceptions from a social psychological study’, Music Education Research, 5, 101–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAUTLEY, M. (2005) ‘A new model of the group composing process of lower secondary school students’, Music Education Research, 7, 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FOLKESTAD, G., HARGREAVES, D. & LINDSTRÖM, B. (1998) ‘Compositional strategies in computer-based music-making’, British Journal of Music Education, 15, 83–97.Google Scholar
HAN, S.-A. (2004) ‘Composers’ perspectives regarding computer technology's impact on the development of compositional craft’, unpublished DEd thesis, Columbia University.Google Scholar
HEWITT, A. (2002) ‘A comparative analysis of process and product with specialist and generalist pre-service teachers involved in a group composition activity’, Music Education Research, 4, 25–36.Google Scholar
HICKEY, M. (Ed.) (2003) Why and How Teach Music Composition: A New Horizon for Music Education. Reston, VA: The National Association for Music Education.Google Scholar
HINDEMITH, P. (1942) Craft of Musical Composition. Mainz: Schott.Google Scholar
HOGG, N. (1994) ‘Strategies to facilitate student composing’, Research Studies in Music Education, 2, 15–24.Google Scholar
KASCHUB, M. (1997) ‘A comparison of two composer-guided large group composition projects’, Research Studies in Music Education, 8, 15–28.Google Scholar
KEANE, D. (1980) ‘Beyond technique: Teaching the unteachable in composition’, Proceedings of the American Society of University Composers, pp. 70–90.Google Scholar
KENNEDY, M. (1999) ‘Where does the music come from? A comparison case-study of the compositional processes of a high school and a collegiate composer’, British Journal of Music Education, 16, 157–177.Google Scholar
KENNEDY, M. (2002) ‘Listening to the music: Compositional processes of high school composers’, Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 94–110.Google Scholar
KENNEDY, M. (2004) ‘Opening the doors to creativity: A pre-service teacher experiment’, Research Studies in Music Education, 23, 32–41.Google Scholar
KLEIMAN, P. (2008) ‘Towards transformation: Conceptions of creativity in higher education’, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45, 209–217.Google Scholar
LOCKWOOD, N. (1955) ‘Composition can be taught!’, Music Journal, 13, 2, 16, 28, 30.Google Scholar
LUPTON, M. (2008) Information Literacy and Learning, Adelaide: Auslib Press.Google Scholar
LUPTON, M. & DAVIDSON, R. (manuscript) ‘Enacting composition curricula’.Google Scholar
MARTIN, J. (2002) ‘Categorising the compositional thinking of tertiary-level students: A provisional taxonomy’, Research Studies in Music Education, 18, 3–12.Google Scholar
MARTON, F. (1996) ‘Cognosco ergo sum – Reflections on reflections’, In Dall'Alba, G. & Hasselgren, B. (Eds), Reflections on Phenomenography (pp. 163–187). Goteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
MARTON, F. & BOOTH, S. (1997) Learning and Awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
MCMILLAN, R. (1999) ‘‘To say something that was me’: Developing a personal voice through improvisation’, British Journal of Music Education, 16, 263–273.Google Scholar
MILLER, M. (2005) The Complete Idiot's Guide to Music Composition. New York: Alpha Books.Google Scholar
NUHN, R., EAGLESTONE, B., FORD, N., MOORE, A. & BROWN, G. (2002) ‘A qualitative analysis of composers at work’. Presented at the International Computer Music Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden. http://www.cea.mdx.ac.uk/local/media/downloads/Nuhn/ComposersatWork2002.pdfGoogle Scholar
REED, A. (1990) ‘How a composer works’, The Instrumentalist, June, 48–49.Google Scholar
RUTHMANN, A. (2007) ‘The composers’ workshop: An approach to composing in the classroom’, Music Educators Journal, 93, 38–43.Google Scholar
STAUFFER, S. (2002) ‘Connections between the musical and life experiences of young composers and their compositions’, Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 301–322.Google Scholar
STAUFFER, S. (2003) ‘Identity and voice in young composers’, in Hickey, M. (Ed.), Why and How Teach Music Composition: A New Horizon for Music Education (pp. 91–111). Reston, VA: The National Association for Music Education.Google Scholar
STEPHENS, J. (2003) ‘Imagination in education: Strategies and models in the teaching and assessment of composition’, in Hickey, M. (Ed.), Why and How Teach Music Composition: A New Horizon for Music Education (pp. 113–138). Reston, VA: The National Association for Music Education.Google Scholar
STERNBERG, R. & LUBART, T. (1999) ‘The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms’, in Sternberg, R. (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
VAN ERNST, B. (1993) ‘A study of the learning and teaching processes of non-naive music students engaged in composition’, Research Studies in Music Education, 1, 22–39.Google Scholar
WEBSTER, P. (2003) ‘What do you mean “make my music different”? Encouraging revision and extension in children's music composition’ in Hickey, M. (Ed.), Why and How Teach Music Composition: A New Horizon for Music Education (pp. 55–65). Reston, VA: The National Association for Music Education.Google Scholar
WIGGINS, J. (2003) ‘A frame for understanding children's compositional processes’ in Hickey, M. (Ed.), Why and How Teach Music Composition: A New Horizon for Music Education (pp. 141–165). Reston, VA: The National Association for Music Education.Google Scholar
WIGGINS, J. (2005) ‘Fostering revision and extension in student composing’, Music Educators Journal, 91 (3), 35–42.Google Scholar
WIGGINS, J. (2007) ‘Compositional process in music’, in Bresler, L. (Ed.), International Handbook of Research in Arts Education (pp. 453–469). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
WILKINS, M. (2006) Creative Music Composition. The Young Composer's Voice, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
YOUNKER, B. A. (2000) ‘Thought processes and strategies of students engaged in music composition’, Research Studies in Music Education, 14 (1), 24–39.Google Scholar
YOUNKER, B. A. & SMITH, W. (1996) ‘Comparing and modeling musical thought processes of expert and novice composers’, Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 128, 25–36.Google Scholar