Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:05:24.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reflections on New Zealand music education through the lens of Swanwick and Tillman’s model of musical development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2022

Vicki Thorpe*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Education, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand
Graham McPhail
Affiliation:
Faculty of Education and Social Work, University of Auckland, New Zealand
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

In this paper, we provide a reflection upon the influence of the Swanwick–Tillman (ST) model (1986) from the perspectives of music research in Aotearoa New Zealand. In this paper we take stock of where music education in New Zealand currently sits in relation to the Swanwick Tillman theory of musical development. We examine the strengths and the weakness of the model 35 years on to ask what it might still offer music educators in a context where issues of culture and colonisation have taken centre stage. We also reflect upon the impact of a visit to New Zealand by Keith Swanwick in 1989. Despite the postmodern or colonial critiques we might make now, we consider if the model may still signify a holistic way of conceiving music development and might still have implications for curriculum design and curriculum making in the 21st century.

Type
Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Biggs, J. & Collis, K. (1982). Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Braatvedt, S. H. (2002). A History of Music Education in New Zealand State Primary and Intermediate Schools 1878–1989. [Unpublished PhD thesis] University of Canterbury, NZ.Google Scholar
Buckton, R. & Manins, S. (1987). Optimal Ages and Stages. Studies in Music Education. The Canterbury Series, 1987.Google Scholar
Couch, D. (2012). Progressive education in New Zealand from 1937 to 1944: Seven years from idea to orthodoxy. Pacific-Asian Education, 24(1), 5572.Google Scholar
Geary, D. (2002). Principles of evolutionary educational psychology. Learning and Individual Differences, 12, 317345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hentschke, L. (1993). Musical development: testing a model in the audience-listening setting. [Unpublished PhD] University of London Institute of Education.Google Scholar
Hindle, R., Hynds, A. S., Phillips, H., & Rameka, L. (2015). Being, flow and knowledge in Māori arts education: Assessing indigenous creativity. Australian Journal of Indigenous Studies, 44(1), 8593. doi 10.1017/jie.2015.7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humpage, L. (2015). Policy change, public attitudes and social citizenship: Does neoliberalism matter? Policy Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. & Lerdahl, F. (2006). The capacity for music: what is it, and what is special about it? Cognition, 100, 3372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A. & Middleton, S. (2009). The kiss and the ghost: Sylvia Ashton-Warner and New Zealand. Wellington: NZCER Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krathwohl, D. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview, Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212221. DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPhail, G & McNeill, J. (in-press). Music education and the neoliberal turn in Aotearoa New Zealand, Action, Criticism, and Theory for Music Education (ACT).Google Scholar
McPhail, G. J., Thorpe, V., & Wise, S. (Eds.) (2018). Educational change and the secondary school music curriculum in Aotearoa New Zealand. London & New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Education. (2000). The arts in the New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.Google Scholar
Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Learning Media.Google Scholar
Ministry of Education. (2020). Change 2- Equal status for mātauranga Māori in NCEA. https://ncea.education.govt.nz/change-2-equal-status-matauranga-maori-ncea.Google Scholar
Ministry of Education. (2021, 30 March). Refresh of the national curriculum for schooling. https://www.education.govt.nz/our-work/information-releases/issue-specific-releases/national-curriculum-refresh/ Google Scholar
Morgan, K., & Manuel, R. (2020). Western science and indigenous wisdom: Is integration possible, practical, plausible? New Zealand Science Review, 76(1–2), 612. https://scientists.org.nz/resources/Documents/NZSR/NZSR76(1-2).pdf Google Scholar
Morley, I. (2014). A multi-disciplinary approach to the origins of music: perspectives from anthropology, archaeology, cognition and behaviour. Journal of Anthropological Sciences, 92, 147177.Google Scholar
Mutch, C. (2013). Progressive education in New Zealand: a revered past, a contested present and an uncertain future. International Journal of Progressive Education, 9(2), 98116.Google Scholar
Peretz, I. (2006). The nature of music from a biological perspective. Cognition, 100, 132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ravignani, A., Delgado, T., & Kirby, S. (2016). Musical evolution in the lab exhibits rhythmic universals. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(7), 17.Google Scholar
Reihana-Morunga (2020). Classroom kōrero: Relationships and the delivery of Māori content in the New Zealand secondary school dance class. Research in Dance Education. DOI: 10.1080/14647893.2020.1759522 Google Scholar
Renwick, W. (2000). External links and sources for ‘Beeby, Clarence Edward’, Dictionary of New Zealand Biography. Te Ara – the Encyclopedia of New Zealand. https://teara.govt.nz/en/biographies/5b17/beeby-clarence-edward/sources Google Scholar
Richardson, E. (2012). In the early world. Wellington, New Zealand: NZCER Press.Google Scholar
Smith, L. T., Tuck, E. K., & Yang, K.W. (Eds.) (2018). Indigenous and Decolonizing Studies in Education: Mapping the Long View. New York and London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanwick, K. (1989). Music education in a pluralist world. Paper presented at Music ‘89, the fourth biennial conference of the New Zealand Society for Music Education (Inc) held in Palmerston North, New Zealand, August 26–29, 1989. 14-25. Published by NZSME (Inc). ISBN 0-473-00903-XGoogle Scholar
Swanwick, K. (1994). Musical knowledge: Intuition, analysis and music education. Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Swanwick, K. (2002). Conference keynote: musical development theories revisited. Music Education Research, 3(2), 227242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanwick, K., & Tillman, J. (1986). The sequence of musical development: A study of children’s composition. British Journal of Music Education, 3(3), 305339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanwick, K. (1979). A basis for music education. Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Thorpe, V., Gain, P., & Wise, S. (in-press). Homegrown progressivism. In Ziegenmeyer, A., Fautley, M., Daveney, K. & Grow, J. (eds.) The Routledge Companion to Teaching Music Composition in Schools: International Perspectives. Routledge.Google Scholar
Thorpe, V & Kinsella, V. (2020). Secondary school arts teachers’ practice autonomy perceptions in New Zealand and England. Journal of Curriculum Studies. DOI: 10.1080/00220272.2020.1767215 Google Scholar
Thwaites, T. (2002). Keith Swanwick – theories of musical development. Music Teach. Issue 13, Term Four. Auckland: Dawson-Falls & Associates.Google Scholar
Webb, L. (2016). Music in beginning teacher classrooms: A mismatch between policy, philosophy, and practice. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 17(12). Retrieved from http://www.ijea.org/v17n12/.Google Scholar