Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:14:31.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Learning music theory en passant: a study in an internationally recognised South African University student choir

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 July 2019

Michael Barrett ,
Roy Page-Shipp ,
Caroline van Niekerk  and
Johan Ferreira
Michael Barrett
Affiliation:
Department of Music, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, South Africa
Roy Page-Shipp
Affiliation:
Manor Ridge, Lynnwood Manor, Pretoria, South Africa
Caroline van Niekerk*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Education, University of Johannesburg Soweto Campus, Johannesburg, South Africa
Johan Ferreira
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, South Africa
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While mastery of aspects of music theory is relevant to rapid learning and understanding of a new choral part, many choirs comprise members with no formal education in music theory. Also, the language of music theory is not intuitive, with many terms having meanings different from those in common use, which can present obstacles for mature learners. The authors hypothesised that students joining an internationally recognised university choir might master aspects of music theory as a by-product of rehearsals. This was tested by having new admissions to such a choir complete a music theory test at the commencement and at the end of a year. The test evaluated the ability to name and write intervals and name notes and the duration of notes. Overall results did not reject the hypothesis. Subjects with no formal music training also showed most, and statistically significant, improvement in the questions related to intervals, which are arguably the most useful skills for choristers who do not sight-read. This appears to be a new finding: the literature shows occasional references to music theory skills, but their acquisition in a learning-by-doing style is not reported. Some insights into ways of enhancing choral performance are a by-product of the principal focus of the study.

Keywords

Choir traininginformal learningmusic theorychoral work
Type
Articles
Information
British Journal of Music Education , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , July 2020 , pp. 155 - 168
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ASHWORTH BARTLE, J. (2008). A lifelong passion for singing in choirs. The Choral Journal, 49(5), 71–75.Google Scholar
BENNETT WALLING, C. (2016). Secondary choral directors’ multicultural teaching practices, attitudes and experiences in international schools. International Journal of Music Education, 34(2), 196–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BREWSTER, M., & GARNETT, L. (2012). The making of a choir: Individuality and consensus in choral singing. In De Quandros, A. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Choral Music (pp. 256–271). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BRUNNER, D. L. (1996). Carefully crafting the choral rehearsal. Music Educators Journal, 83(3), 37–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BUONVIRI, N. (2015). Effects of music notation reinforcement on aural memory for melodies. International Journal of Music Education, 33(4), 442–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DAHL, T. B. (2011). The Choir. Singing, Leading, Communicating. Stavanger: Cantando Musikvorlag.Google Scholar
DE BEER, R., & SHITANDI, W. (2012). Choral music in Africa: History, content, and performance practice. In De Quandros, A. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Choral Music (pp. 185–200). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DE QUANDROS, A. (2012). Introduction: Choral music – a dynamic global genre. In De Quandros, A. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Choral Music. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DURRANT, C. (2003). Choral Conducting. Philosophy and Practice. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
ELLIOTT, D. (1995). Music Matters: A New Philosophy of Music Education. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
ELLIOTT, D. J. (1993). The nature and value of choral music education. The Choral Journal, 33(8), 11–17.Google Scholar
FAUTLEY, M. (2017). Editorial: Notation and music education. British Journal of Music Education, 34(2), 123–126. doi: 10.1017/S0265051717000031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FREER, P. (2009). Focus on scaffolding language and sequential units during choral instruction. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 28, 33–40.Google Scholar
GARNETT, L. (2009). Choral Conducting and the Construction of Meaning. Gesture, Voice, Identity. Surrey, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
LUCIA, C. (2007). How critical is music theory? Critical Arts: A South North Journal of Cultural and Media Studies, 21(1), 166–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PAGE-SHIPP, R., & VAN NIEKERK, C. (2013). Mental models in the learning and teaching of music theory concepts. Journal of New Generation Sciences, 11(2), 58–74.Google Scholar
PAGE-SHIPP, R., & VAN NIEKERK, C. (2014). A superannuated physicist’s attempts to master music theory: Resolving cognitive conflicts and a paradigm clash. International Journal of Music Education 32(2), 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PAULK, J. (2004). Perspectives on sight-reading choral repertoire. Choral Journal, 45(3), 28–35.Google Scholar
RAO, D. (2012). Authentic choral music experience as ‘good work’: The practice of engaged musicianship. In De Quandros, A. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Choral Music (pp. 238–255). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RUTTER, J. (2012). Foreword. In De Quandros, A. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Choral Music (pp. 256–271). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
SMITH, B., & SATALOFF, R. T. (2006). Choral Pedagogy (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.Google Scholar
Varvarigou, M. (2016). ‘I owe it to my group members . . . who critically commented on my conducting’ – Cooperative learning in choral conducting education. International Journal of Music Education, 34(1), 116–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WELCH, G. F. (2007). Singing and vocal development. In McPherson, G. (ed.), The Child as Musician: A Handbook of Musical Development (pp. 311–329). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
YARBROUGH, C. (2002). Sequencing musical tasks: The teaching artistry of Robert Shaw. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 21(1), 30–37.Google Scholar
YARBROUGH, C., & MADSEN, K. (1998). The evaluation of teaching in choral rehearsals. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 469–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
YARBROUGH, C., PRICE, H. E. & HENDEL, C. (1991). The effect of knowledge of research on rehearsal skills and teaching values of experienced teachers. The teaching artistry of Robert Shaw. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 9(2), 17–20.Google Scholar
ZIELINSKI, R. (2005). The performance pyramid: Building blocks for a successful choral performance. Music Educators Journal, 92(1), 44–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
http://www.interkultur.comGoogle Scholar
http://www.choralnet.org www.worldchoralexpo.com/en/InvitedGoogle Scholar