Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:42:46.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘It makes you think anything is possible’: Representing diversity in music theory pedagogy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Robert Davidson  and
Mandy Lupton
Robert Davidson
Affiliation:
School of Music, School of Music, University of Queensland, Qld 4072, [email protected]
Mandy Lupton
Affiliation:
Queensland University of Technology, Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper critiques a traditional approach to music theory pedagogy. It argues that music theory courses should draw on pedagogies that reflect the diversity and pluralism inherent in 21st century music making. It presents the findings of an action research project investigating the experiences of undergraduate students undertaking an innovative contemporary art music theory course. It describes the students’ struggle in coming to terms with a course that integrated composing, performing, listening and analysing coupled with what for many was their first exposure to the diversity of contemporary art music. The paper concludes with suggesting that the approach could be adopted more widely throughout music programs.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Music Education , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , July 2016 , pp. 175 - 189
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BUTLER, M. (2005) Hearing kaleidoscopes: Embedded grouping dissonance in electronic dance music. Twentieth-Century Music, 2 (2), 221–43.Google Scholar
CAPUZZO, G. C. (2004) Neo-Riemannian theory and the analysis of pop-rock music. Music Theory Spectrum, 26 (2), 177–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ELLIOTT, D. (2001) Modernity, postmodernity and music education philosophy. Research Studies in Music Education, 17, 32–41.Google Scholar
FINK, R. (2011) Goal-directed soul? Analyzing rhythmic teleology in African American popular music. Journal of the American Musicological Society, 64 (1), 75,179–237.Google Scholar
GREEN, L. (1988) Music on Deaf Ears: Musical Meaning, Ideology, Education, Manchester, New York, N.Y.: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
HANLEY, B. and MONTGOMERY, J. 2005, Challenges to music education: Curriculum reconceptualized. Music Educators Journal, 91 (4), 17–20.Google Scholar
HUGILL, A. (2008) The Digital Musician, New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
MCCLARY, S. (1990) Start Making Sense! Musicology wrestles with rock. In Frith, S. & Goodwin, A. (Eds.), On Record : Rock, Pop, and the Written Word (pp. 277–92). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
MCKENDRY, T. (2011) Redefining ‘talent’ and democratising composition: Overcoming challenges to teaching composition to large cohorts in the university sector. In Mackinlay, E. & Forrest, D. (Eds.), Redefining the Musical Landscape: Inspired Learning and Innovation in Music Education - XIX National Conference Proceedings (pp. 132–7). Gold Coast, Australia, 2–5 July, 2011, Australian Society for Music Education.Google Scholar
MELLERS, W. (1998) Review: The perils of pluralism. The Musical Times, 139, 60–2.Google Scholar
MIDDLETON, R. (1990) Studying Popular Music. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
MONELLE, R. (1996) The postmodern project in music theory. In Tarasti, E., Forsell, P. & Littlefield, R. (Eds.), Musical Semiotics in Growth (pp. 37–56). Indiana: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
NORTON, L. (2009) Action Research in Teaching and Learning: A Practical Guide to Conducting Pedagogical Research in Universities, Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
OTERI, F. (2005) Naming names. New Music Box, Vol. 2013.Google Scholar
PIESLAK, J. (2007) Re-casting Metal: Rhythm and meter in the music of Meshuggah. Music Theory Spectrum, 29 (2), 219–45.Google Scholar
ROGERS, M. R. (1984) Teaching Approaches in Music Theory: An Overview of Pedagogical Philosophies, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
SARATH, E. (1995) Is the paradigm shifting without us? The need for fundamental reform in contemporary musical training in the USA. International Journal of Music Education, 25, 29–37.Google Scholar
SARATH, E. (2010) Music Theory through Improvisation: A New Approach to Musicianship Training. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
SHAW-MILLER, S. (1993) The Last Post: Music after Modernism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
TREGEAR, P. (2014), Enlightenment or entitlement? Reflections on tertiary music education in Australia. Platform Papers, Currency House. 38: 1–62.Google Scholar
WASON, R. W. (2002) Musica practica: Music theory as pedagogy. In Christensen, T. S. (Ed.), The Cambridge History of Western Music Theory (pp. 46–77). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
WEBB, M. (2008) Gilles Apap's Mozart cadenza and expanding musical competences of twenty-first-century musicians and music educators. Music Education Research, 10 (1), 15–39.Google Scholar
YOU YOUNG, K. (2006) Defending music theory in a multicultural curriculum. College Music Symposium, 46, 45–63.Google Scholar