Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:03:28.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Developing an understanding of appraising music with practising primary teachers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Abstract

paper deals with a central concept in music education, that of ‘appraising’ music. Through a series of incidents surrounding the development of the Music National Curriculum this concept, new to many, was left undefined. Using research which shows how people cope with change and successfully take on innovations, a need for deeper information on what appraising entails, and the underlying principles involved, was identified – that is, the ‘how-to’ and ‘principles’ knowledge of appraising. The paper reports research carried out with a group of teachers to define the activity of appraising music in a way which takes account of real classroom situations and can be used by the 90% of primary teachers who are not music specialists. Because the definition is developed by teachers it is more likely to be understood by other teachers. The paper ends with an example of a programme of work which uses the developed understanding. This includes nine areas of appraising, an explanatory definition and four stages in the process of appraising as well as an understanding of progression in this activity using seven words to indicate progression and identifying a ‘putting in’ and ‘drawing out’ stage within this.The children's appraising and progression is discussed and the paper argues that, in choosing this term, the Music Working Group has identified the way in which we come to know and understand the processes involved in music and musical thinking within the three activities of Composing, Performing and Listening.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bearman, & Pauley, (1975) Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change. Vol. 2: Factors Affecting Change Agent Projects. Santa Monica, California: Rand Cooperation Report.Google Scholar
Cargill, & Pratt, (1991) Up and Running: An Update on the RAMP Unit's Work at Huddersfield Polytechnic. BJME (1991) 8, 2138.Google Scholar
Davidson, & Scripp, (1988) ‘Young Children's Musical Representations: Windows on Music Cognition'. In Sloboda, J. (Ed.) Generative Processes in Music. Oxford; Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
DES (1991) Music for ages 5–14. London:HMSO.Google Scholar
DES (1985) Curriculum Matters 4, Music from 5 to 16. London:HMSO.Google Scholar
DES (1988) Primary School Staffing Survey, Unpublished survey.Google Scholar
Dearing, R. (1993) The National Curriculum and its Assessment: An Interim Report. London, SCAA.Google Scholar
Emrick, et al. (1977) Evaluation of the National Diffusion Network vol 1 Findings and Recommendations. Menlo Park, California; Standford Research Report.Google Scholar
Everland, et al. (1977) The Innovation Process in Public Organisations. Ann Arbour University of Michigan; Department of Journalism, Mimeo Report.Google Scholar
Gordon, M. & Prettyman, C. (1991) Sound Listening. Cumbria Education Service.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, D. (1992) ‘Theory and practice in music education: a British perspective’. In Music teacher training in the year 2000 — three European perspectives. Proceedings of the International Conference in Research on Music Education, Sept. 15–17, 1992, University of Goteborg, Sweden.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, D. (1986) The Developmental Psychology of Music. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, S. (1963) Philosophy in a New Key. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, R. F. (1992) ‘Affective Response’. In Colwell, R. Handbook of Research on Music Teaching and Learning. N.Y.: Schrimer.Google Scholar
NCC (1992a) Consultation Report on Music in the National Curriculum. LondonDES.Google Scholar
NCC (1992b) Draft Order for Music. London:DES.Google Scholar
Preston, H. (1994) Listening, Appraising and Composing; Case Studies in Music. BJME, vol 11, no 1.Google Scholar
Plummeridge, (1991) Music Education in Theory and Practice. London:Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Regelski, (1975) Principles and Problems of Music Education. Prentice-Hall: New Jersey.Google Scholar
Reimer, B. (1989) A Philosophy of Music Education. Prentice-Hall: NJ.Google Scholar
Rogers, E. (1986) The Diffusion of Innovations. Third edition, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Swanwick, K. (1994) Musical Knowledge: Intuition, Analysis and Music Education. London:Routledge.Google Scholar
Swanwick, K. (1992) Music Education and the National Curriculum. The London File, Papers from the Institute of Education. London: Tufnell Press.Google Scholar
Swanwick, K. (1988) Music Mind and Education. London:Routledge.Google Scholar