Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:47:37.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cost Versus Risk-Single-Use Versus Reuse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

Diane Gilmour
Diane Gilmour
Affiliation:
Theatres Surrey & Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust
Get access

Extract

In July 2001 nine year old Tony Clowes died after suffering brain damage during preparation for minor surgery, following a cycling accident, when an anaesthetic tubing became blocked with a foreign body. At the enquiry it emerged that the tubing had been used on other patients despite being labeled for single-use only. A year later police ruled out “foul play” and concluded that the tragic death was a “freak accident”. This was one of many such incidents being investigated by police at the time and resulted in national and nursing media frenzy concerning the reuse of single - use equipment. (Gallagher 2002; Kenny 2002; Mahoney 2001) The debate was further fuelled by the withdrawal of single - use tonsillectomy instruments as they posed a greater danger to patients than the theoretical risk of spreading variant Creutzfeldt - Jakob disease (CJD), the purpose for which they were originally introduced. (Gallagher 2002)

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Anaesthetic & Recovery Nursing , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , May 2003 , pp. 18 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © British Association of Anaesthetic and Recovery Nursing 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

AAGBI & RCA (2001) Joint Statement from the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and the Royal College of Anaesthetists. Single-use Medical Devices. AAGBI & RCA. LondonGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, C. (2002) When once s not enough. Nursing Times 98(38) 22–25Google Scholar
Heathfield, E. (2001) Decontamination of reusable anaesthetic equipment; a student's perspective Technic 217 10–11Google Scholar
Intersurgical (2001) Statement regarding Intersurgical Single-use Anaesthetic Breathing Systems. Intersurgical March 2001 Issue 4Google Scholar
Kenny, C. (2002) Police rule out foul play in death of nine -year-old Nursing Times 98 (31) 6Google Scholar
Mahoney, C. (2001) Air tube inquiry shifts focus to health staff Nursing Times 97 (34) 5Google Scholar
MDA (1995) The Reuse of Medical Devices Supplied for Single-use only. Bulletin MDA DB 9501Google Scholar
MDA (2000) Single-use Medical Devices: Implications and Consequences of Reuse. Bulletin MDA DB2000(04)Google Scholar
Nursing & Midwifery Council (2002) Code of professional conduct NMC. London.Google Scholar
Patients Association (2001) Patients Association Survey-The Decontamination of Surgical Instruments. Patients Association www.patients-association.comGoogle Scholar
Pidduck, D. (2002) Cross infection and the laryngoscope. British Journal of Perioperative Nursing 12 (5) 170–175Google ScholarPubMed
Wilson, J. (2001) Infection Control in Clinical Practice Balliere Tindall. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Health & Safety at Work Act (1974)Google Scholar
Consumer Protection Act (1987)Google Scholar
Medical Devices Regulations (1994)Google Scholar