Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T18:28:35.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Visible incarnations of the unseen’: Henry Drummond and the practice of typological exegesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2004

ANNE SCOTT
ANNE SCOTT
Affiliation:
Centre for History & Cultural Studies of Science, Rutherford College, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, UK.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Although Henry Drummond's Natural Law in the Spiritual World (1883) is frequently cited by historians in relation to the impact of evolutionary theories on the Victorian churches, attention has not been paid to the audiences of working-class men in Glasgow for whom the papers were originally constructed. By drawing upon the notebook in which the author sketched out the series of addresses, in addition to materials relating to the interpretative habits of these audiences; I am able to consider the text as a work of practical apologetics rather than as a contribution to elite intellectual debate. This paper promises to open up new lines of enquiry with regard to the materials with which working-class audiences attempted to construct their own interpretations of contemporary scientific and religious issues. It also highlights Drummond's hitherto unrecognized use of specific practices of biblical exegesis and his debt to the work of the anatomist Richard Owen which, by keeping different forms of life distinct, and explaining organization as the effect of life already present, allowed the author to visualize the process of descent in terms of an inherent tendency to change in line with the unfolding of a pre-existing plan.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal for the History of Science , Volume 37 , Issue 4 , December 2004 , pp. 435 - 454
Copyright
2004 British Society for the History of Science

Footnotes

I am especially grateful to Professor Crosbie Smith who supervised the Ph.D. thesis on part of which this paper is based. The incisive comments of Professor David N. Livingstone, Alex Dolby and Dr Philip Boobbyer are acknowledged with thanks. I am also grateful for the suggestions, made by two anonymous referees, on an earlier draft. I would also like to acknowledge the help of the archivists in the National Library of Scotland and the libraries of the University of Edinburgh. For a more detailed version of the argument set forth here see Anne Scott, ‘Practices of witnessing in Victorian science and religion: the heresy trial of William Robertson Smith and the development of Henry Drummond's evolutionary “Scientific Theology”’, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Kent, 2002, esp. Chapters 2 and 5.