Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:01:58.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sir John Herschel and the Development of Spectroscopy in Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

M. A. Sutton
M. A. Sutton
Affiliation:
Department of Humanities, Newcastle upon Tyne Polytechnic, Ellison Place, Newcastle NE1 8ST.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the most dramatic advances in the physical sciences during the nineteenth century was the emergence of spectroscopy. It rapidly became an invaluable experimental technique for chemists and astronomers, while for physicists it opened a window upon the world of sub-atomic phenomena. Sir John Herschel played an important part, the value of which has sometimes been underestimated, in the early development of spectroscopy. This paper examines his contribution to the subject during the period 1819–61 in the light of his publications and of certain manuscript material preserved in the Royal Society's Library. Herschel corresponded with most of the scientists who did important work in spectroscopy during his lifetime, and he expressed definite opinions on most of the practical and theoretical problems that arose in it; however, the present study cannot pretend to offer a complete discussion of all aspects of the early history of spectroscopy.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal for the History of Science , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 1974 , pp. 42 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © British Society for the History of Science 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* The author wishes to thank the Royal Society for permission to study and quote from the Herschel Papers, and Dr E. J. Bowen, Mr G. L'E. Turner, and Dr A. D. Orange for reading parts of this paper and offering much helpful advice.

1 See Dingle, H., ‘A hundred years of spectroscopy’, The British journal for the history of science, 1 (1962–1963), 199–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar; also Roscoe, H. E., Six lectures on spectrum analysis (4th edn., London 1885), pp. 84–7.Google Scholar

2 In addition to the studies cited in note 1, McGucken, W.'s Nineteenth century spectroscopy (London and Baltimore, 1969)Google Scholar gives an account of certain aspects of the subject in considerable detail.

3 Wollaston, W. H., ‘On a method of examining refractive and dispersive powers by prismatic reflection’, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society, xcii (1802), 378–80.Google Scholar

4 Newton, I., Opticks (4th edn., London 1730; reprinted New York, 1952, by Dover Books), p. 72.Google Scholar

5 Melvill, T., ‘Observations on light and colours’, Edinburgh physical and literary essays, ii (1752), 35Google Scholar. For further comment on the development of the chemical flame test, see Szabadvary, F., History of analytical chemistry, trans. Svemla, G. (London, 1966), pp. 58, 186.Google Scholar

6 von Fraunhofer, J., ‘Bestimmung des Brechungs- und Farbenzerstreuungs- Vermögens verschneider Glasarten, in Bezug auf die Vervollkommung achromatischer Fernröhre’, Denkschriften der Kōniglichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu München, v (1817), 193–266Google Scholar. Translated by Brewster, D. in Edinburgh philosophical journal, ix (1833), 288–99Google Scholar; also translated in Ames, J. S. (ed.), Harper's scientific memoirs, no. 2 (London and New York, 1898), pp. 3–10.Google Scholar

7 Brewster, D., ‘Descriptions of a monochromatic lamp for microscopical purposes &c., with remarks on the absorption of prismatic rays by coloured media’, Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, ix (1822), 435.Google Scholar

8 Young, T., ‘An account of some cases of the production of colours’, Philosophical transactions, xcii (1802), 395.Google Scholar

9 Herschel, to Brewster, , 24 07 1822Google Scholar, Royal Society MSS. ‘J. F. W. Herschel’ (uncatalogued); also Herschel, to Brewster, , 7 08 1822Google Scholar, ibid., vol. xix. 27.

10 Herschel, to Babbage, , 2 12 1821Google Scholar, Royal Society MSS. ‘J. F. W. Herschel’, vol. xx. 130.Google Scholar

11 Herschel, J. F. W., ‘On the rotation impressed by plates of rock crystal on the planes of polarization of rays of light’, Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, i (1822), 43–52.Google Scholar

12 Herschel, J. F. W., ‘On the hyposulphurous acid and its compounds’, Edinburgh philosophical journal, i (1819), 8–29, 396–400.Google Scholar

13 See Herschel, , loc. cit. (9)Google Scholar; also Brewster, to Herschel, , 12 10 1822Google Scholar, Royal Society MSS. ‘J. F. W. Herschel’, vol. iv. 256.Google Scholar

14 Herschel, to Babbage, , 16 10 1822Google Scholar, ibid., vol. xx. 152.

15 Herschel, J. F. W., ‘On the absorption of light by coloured media, and on the colours of the prismatic spectrum exhibited by certain flames; with an account of a ready mode of determining the absolute dispersive power of any medium, by direct experiment’, Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, ix (1822), 445–60.Google Scholar

16 Ibid., p. 456.

17 This is revealed in Brewster's obituary of Fraunhofer in American journal of science, xvi (1829), 301.Google Scholar

18 Herschel, to Brinkley, , 11 12 1824Google Scholar, Royal Society MSS. ‘J. F. W. Herschel’, vol. xx. 193.Google Scholar

19 Herschel, to Brewster, , 28 11 1825Google Scholar, ibid., vol. xx. 255.

20 Talbot, to Herschcl, (undated, but apparently written early in 1826)Google Scholar, ibid., vol. xvii. 234.

21 Talbot, W. H. F., ‘Some experiments on coloured flames’, Edinburgh journal of science, v (1826), 77–81.Google Scholar

22 Ibid., p. 78.

23 Ibid., p. 81.

24 Brewster, D., ‘Notes sur l'histoire de l'analyse spectrale’, Comptes rendus des séances hebdomadaires de l'Académie des Sciences, lxii (1866), 17Google Scholar. It is interesting to compare Talbot's 1826 paper with one published by Turner, Edward (‘On the means of detecting Lithia in minerals by the blowpipe’, Edinburgh journal of science, iv [1825], 113Google Scholar.), which makes no mention of the use of a prism to distinguish between flames of similar colours.

25 Talbot, to Herschel, , 07 1826Google Scholar, Royal Society MSS. ‘J. F. W. Herschel’, vol. xvii. 261.Google Scholar

26 Talbot, to Herschel, , 22 05 1827Google Scholar, ibid., vol. xvii. 263. This effect is also mentioned in Talbot, 's ‘Facts relating to optical science, no. 2’, Philosophical magazine, 3rd ser. vi (1834), 114.Google Scholar

27 Talbot, to Herschel, , 31 05 1833Google Scholar, ibid., vol. xvii. 272.

28 Talbot, to Herschel, , 29 10 1827Google Scholar, ibid., vol. xvii. 267.

29 Faraday's diary 1820–62, ed. Martin, T. (7 vols., London, 1932).Google Scholar

30 See Jones, H. Bence, Faraday's life and letters (2 vols., London, 1870)Google Scholar; also Williams, L. P., Michael Faraday. A biography (London, 1965).Google Scholar

31 Faraday, to Herschel, , 30 05 1826Google Scholar, Royal Society MSS. ‘J. F. W. Herschel’, vol. vii. 172Google Scholar. Reproduced in Williams, L. P. (ed.), The selected correspondence of Michael Faraday (2 vols., Cambridge, 1971), i. 163.Google Scholar

32 Herschel, J. F. W., ‘Light’, Encyclopaedia metropolitana, iv (London, 1827), 409.Google Scholar

33 Ibid., p. 409.

34 Ibid., p. 409 (emphasis added).

35 Ibid., p. 433.

36 Foucault, L., ‘Note sur la lumière de l'arc voltaique’, first published in Journal de l'Institut (02, 1849), reprinted in Annales de chimie, lviii (1860), 476–8Google Scholar. Translated by Stokes, G. G. in Philosophical magazine, 4th ser. xix (1860), 193–7.Google Scholar

37 Kirchhoff, G., ‘Uber die Fraunhofer'shen Linien’, Monatsberichte der Köninglich Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin (1859), 662–5Google Scholar. Translated by Stokes, G. G., loc. cit. (36).Google Scholar

38 Herschel, to Tyndall, , 21 07 1861Google Scholar, Royal Society MSS. ‘J. F. W. Herschel’, vol. xvii. 388Google Scholar. Cf. McGucken, , op. cit. (2), p. 7.Google Scholar

39 Herschel, to Tyndall, , loc. cit. (38).Google Scholar

40 Herschel, , op. cit. (32), p. 438.Google Scholar

41 Ibid.

42 See McGucken, , op. cit. (2), p. 9.Google Scholar

43 A notable exception was W. A. Miller, but even his interest was not sustained. He published an interesting paper, ‘Experiments and observations on some cases of lines in the prismatic spectrum produced by the passage of light through coloured vapours and gases, and from, certain coloured flames’, Philosophical magazine, 3rd ser. xxvii (1845), 81–91Google Scholar, but contributed, nothing further until the 1860s, when his work on stellar spectra, carried out with William Huggins, was of some importance.

44 Frankland's question came in the course of a discussion on spectra at the Chemical Society, following the paper by Roscoe, H. E. (mentioned below), which was reported in Chemical news, iv (1861), 130–3.Google Scholar

45 See, for example, the comments on the atomic theory by Liebig, in his Familiar letters on chemistry (2nd edn., London, 1851)Google Scholar. Cf. the account of the reception of Newland's work given in Van Spronsen, J. W.'s paper ‘One hundred years of the law of octaves’, Chymia, xi (1966), 135.Google Scholar

46 Herschel, to Talbot, , 28 12 1830Google Scholar, Royal Society MSS. ‘J. F. W. Herschel’, vol. xxv (1). 15.Google Scholar

47 Royal Society MSS., Fellows' certificates, 1831.

48 Babbage, C., Reflections on the decline of science in England and on some of its causes (London, 1830).Google Scholar

49 For further information see Orange, A. D., ‘The origins of the British Association for the Advancement of Science’, The British journal for the history of science, vi (1972–1973), 152–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

50 Herschel, to Brewster, , 25 11 1831Google Scholar, Royal Society MSS. ‘J. F. W. Herschel’, vol. xxv (2). 30Google Scholar; also Brewster, to Herschel, , 1 12 1831Google Scholar, ibid., vol. iv. 262.

51 Brewster, D., Treatise on optics (London, 1831).Google Scholar

52 Like Newton, Brewster preferred the corpuscular theory of light, but, unlike him, refused to accept that colour and degree of refrangibility were invariably associated. He claimed that light of a single degree of refrangibility, produced by prismatic analysis, could be resolved still further by the use of coloured filters, and conversely that light of any given colour might be found, in some proportion, throughout the complete spectrum. Brewster's views are set out, and defended against his critics, in ‘A reply to the Astronomer Royal on the new analysis of solar light’, Philosophical magazine, 4th ser. iv (1852), 401–16.Google Scholar

53 Brewster, D., ‘Report on optics’, Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, 1832 (London, 1833), p. 319.Google Scholar

54 Ibid., p. 321.

55 The information was first disclosed in an aside in Brewster, 's paper ‘Observations on the absorption of specific rays with reference to the undulatory theory of light’, Philosophical magazine, 3rd ser. ii (1833), 360–3.Google Scholar

56 Talbot, to Herschel, , 27 03 1833Google Scholar, Royal Society MSS. ‘J. F. W. Herschel’, vol. xvii. 270.Google Scholar

57 The full account of Brewster, 's absorption experiments appeared in ‘Observations on the lines of the solar spectrum and on those produced by the Earth's atmosphere, and by the action of nitrous acid gas’, Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, xii (1834), 519–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

58 Ibid., p. 527.

59 Brewster, , op. cit. (55), p. 363.Google Scholar

60 Airy, G. B., ‘Remarks on Sir David Brewster's paper on the absorption of specific rays’, Philosophical magazine, 3rd ser. ii (1833), 423.Google Scholar

61 von Wrede, F., ‘An attempt to explain the absorption of light according to the undulatory theory’, Taylor's scientific memoirs, i (1836), 477–502Google Scholar; translated from Annalen der Physik und Chemie, xxxii (1834), 353Google Scholar. It is worthy of note that von Wrede saw the spectral lines as providing further evidence of the molecular nature of matter and as supporting Ampère's hypothesis.

62 See the Editor's footnote in Philosophical magazine, 3rd ser. x (1837), 355.Google Scholar

63 Talbot's delay in publication is explained in the letter cited above (note 56). Meanwhile a brief account of the phenomenon had been published by Daniell, J. F. and Miller, W. H. in ‘Report of the proceedings of the Cambridge philosophical society’, Philosophical magazine, 3rd ser. ii (1833), 381.Google Scholar

64 Herschel, J. F. W., ‘On the absorption of light by coloured media, viewed in connexion with the undulatory theory’, Philosophical magazine, 3rd ser. iii (1833), 401–12.Google Scholar

65 Ibid., p. 405.

66 Ibid., p. 407.

67 Herschel's correspondence with Wheatstone indicates further interest in experiments to illustrate analogies between sound and light: e.g. Wheatstone, to Herschel, , 23 08 1825Google Scholar, Royal Society MSS. ‘J. F. W. Herschel’, vol. xviii. 144Google Scholar. For the interesting suggestion that Wheatstone's acoustic work influenced the development of Faraday's field theories, see Williams, , op. cit. (30), p. 177.Google Scholar

68 Herschel, , op. cit. (64), p. 410.Google Scholar

69 Herschel, , op. cit. (32), p. 433.Google Scholar

70 Ibid., p. 409.

71 Herschel, , op. cit. (64), p. 402.Google Scholar

72 Evans, D. S., Deeming, T. J., Evans, B. H., Goldfarb, S. (eds.), Herschel at the Cape—Diaries and correspondence of Sir John Herschel 1834–8 (Austin, Texas, and London, 1969).Google Scholar

73 Talbot, to Herschel, , loc. cit. (56).Google Scholar

74 Talbot, M. H. F., ‘On the nature of light’, Philosophical magazine, 3rd ser. vii (1835), 113.Google Scholar

75 Talbot, W. H. F., ‘Facts relating to optical science, no. 3’, Philosophical magazine, 3rd ser. ix (1836), 3.Google Scholar

76 See Talbot, to Herschel, , 28 08 1839Google Scholar, Royal Society MSS. ‘J. F. W. Herschel’, vol. xxv (5). 15–16Google Scholar. Cf. Herschel, J. F. W., ‘On the action of the rays of the solar spectrum on vegetable colours, and on some new photographic processes’, Philosophical transactions, cxxxii (1842), 181–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

77 See the Herschel-Draper letters, Royal Society MSS. ‘J. F. W. Herschel’, vol. vi.Google Scholar

78 Diary of J. F. W. Herschel (copy), Royal Society MSS. The entries for 1838 show that he was heavily involved in the preparations for the forthcoming geomagnetic expedition to the Antarctic.

79 Herschel, to Talbot, , 29 02 1848Google Scholar, Royal Society MSS. ‘J. F. W. Herschel’, vol. xxiii. 14.Google Scholar

80 See Stokes, G. G., ‘On the change of refrangibility of light’, Philosophical transactions, cxlii (1852), 463–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

81 Herschel, J. F. W., ‘On the epipolic dispersion of light’, Philosophical transactions, cxxxv (1845), 143–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

82 Stokes, to Herschel, , 27 06 1856Google Scholar, Royal Society MSS. ‘J. F. W. Herschel’, vol. xvii. 31.Google Scholar

83 Herschel, to Stokes, , 1 07 1856Google Scholar, ibid., vol. xvii. 32.

84 Stokes, to Herschel, , 8 07 1856Google Scholar, ibid., vol. xvii. 33.

85 See Stokes's letter to Whitmel, C., Nature, xii (1876), 188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

86 Stokes, G. G., Mathematical and physical papers, ed. Larmor, J. (5 vols., Cambridge, 1880–1905), iv. 367–76.Google Scholar

87 Ibid., p. 373.

88 See, for example, Knight, D. M., ‘The problem of the chemical elements, from Humphry Davy to Benjamin Brodie the younger’ (University of Oxford D.Phil, thesis, 1964)Google Scholar; also Brock, W. H., ‘Studies in the history of Prout's hypothesis’, Annals of science, xxv (1969), 49–80, 127–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

89 Brown, 's claim appeared in his paper ‘Experimental researches on the production of silicon from paracyanogen’, Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, xv (1842), 229–46Google Scholar. Talbot and Herschel, while remaining sceptical about the validity of this claim, expressed support for the general concept of complex elements; see Talbot, 's letter to Herschel, , 6 04 1841Google Scholar, Royal Society MSS. ‘J. F. W. Herschel’, vol. xvii. 306Google Scholar, and Herschel, 's to Talbot, , 6 04 1841Google Scholar, ibid., vol. xvii. 306 (a).

90 See Lockyer, N., Studies in spectrum analysis (London, 1878).Google Scholar

91 See his presidential address in Report of the proceedings of the British Association, 1871 (London, 1872), pp. xciii–xcvGoogle Scholar; also Thompson, S. P., Life of Lord Kelvin (2 vols., London, 1910), ii. 1201.Google Scholar

92 Roscoe, H. E., ‘On the application of the induction coil to Steinheil's apparatus for spectrum analysis’, a lecture delivered to the Chemical Society on 20 06 1861, printed in Chemical news, iv (1861), 118–22.Google Scholar

93 From debate following Roscoe's lecture; op. cit. (44), p. 132.

94 Herschel, to Tyndall, , loc. cit. (38).Google Scholar

95 See, for example, Knight, D. M., ‘Steps towards a dynamic chemistry’, Ambix, xiv (1967), 179–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar; also Levere, T. H., ‘Faraday, matter, and natural theology—reflections on an unpublished manuscript’, The British journal for the history of sciente, iv (1968–1969), 95–8, and works cited therein.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

96 Of some interest in this context is a paper by William West of Leeds, who remarked on the fact that a chemical element combined with another element, with heat, and with electricity in a fixed numerical ratio, according to the law of equivalent proportions, Dulong and Petit's law of atomic heats, and Faraday's law of electrolysis. See West, W., ‘On a remarkable analogy between ponderable bodies and caloric and electricity’, Philosophical magazine, 3rd ser. v (1834), 110.Google Scholar

97 Mitscherlich, A., ‘On the spectra of compounds and simple substances’, Philosophical magazine, 4th ser. xxviii (1864), 169–89Google Scholar; translated from Annalen der Physik und Chemie, cxxi (1864), 459–88.Google Scholar

98 Lockyer, , op. cit. (90).Google Scholar

99 Dingle, , op. cit. (1).Google Scholar

100 McGucken, , op. cit. (2).Google Scholar

101 See Brock, W. H., ‘Lockyer and the chemists’, Ambix, xvi (1969), 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

102 Bunsen, R. W., ‘Remarks on chemical affinity’, Philosophical magazine, 4th ser. v (1853)Google Scholar; translated from Comptes rendus, xxxv (1852), 835–6.Google Scholar

103 A similar appeal for a re-examination of Berthollet's work was made by Story-Maskelyne, Nevil, in a paper entitled ‘On the connexion of the chemical forces with the polarization of light’, Philosophical magazine, 4th ser. i (1851), 428–32.Google Scholar

104 Whewell, W., Novum organum renovatum (3rd edn., London, 1858), p. 221.Google Scholar

105 Whewell, W., Philosophy of the inductive sciences (2 vols., London, 1840), i. 405–22.Google Scholar

106 See Graves, R. P., Life of Sir William Rowan Hamilton (2 vols., Dublin, 1882), ii. 85.Google Scholar

107 See Faraday's diary, op. cit. (29), vii. 462–5Google Scholar. Note in particular the absence of any dis cussion of the origin of line spectra in Faraday's speculative paper ‘Thoughts on ray vibrations’, Philosophical magazine, 3rd ser. xxviii (1846), 345–50.Google Scholar