Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T17:36:17.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mary Anning (1799–1847) of Lyme; ‘the greatest fossilist the world ever knew’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Hugh Torrens
Hugh Torrens
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Presidential Address
Information
The British Journal for the History of Science , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , September 1995 , pp. 257 - 284
Copyright
Copyright © British Society for the History of Science 1995

References

1 Washburn, W. E., ‘Manuscripts and manufacts’, American Archivist (1964), 27, 245–50, on 247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 The Dictionary of National Biography, 22 vols., London, 1885–1900.Google Scholar

3 The British Museum General Catalogue of Printed Books, 263 vols., London, 1965–1966, v, 774.Google Scholar

4 Matthew, C., ‘The New Dictionary of National Biography’, History Today (1993), 43, 10–13, on 12.Google Scholar

5 Her only publication was an extract of a letter to E. Charlesworth which he then published, in his Magazine of Natural History (1839), new series 3, 605.Google Scholar

6 Forde, H. A., The Heroine of Lyme Regis – The Story of Mary Anning, the Celebrated Geologist, London: Wells Gardner, Darton and Co. Ltd, [1925].Google Scholar

7 The National Union Catalog pre-1956 Imprints, 754 vols., London, 1968–1981.Google Scholar

8 This annotation is on an undated letter from Mary Anning to one of the Misses Philpot of Lyme, in the collections of the American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia.

9 Details will hopefully appear in my forthcoming biography.

10 Torrens, H. S., ‘Mary Anning's ancestry’, Devon and Cornwall Notes and Queries (1981), 34, 341.Google Scholar

11 Public Record Office, London, RG 4/462.

12 Preserved in the Dorset County Record Office, Dorchester.

13 Bath Chronicle, 27 12 1798, 3.Google Scholar

14 Lang, W. D., ‘Mary Anning's escape from lightning’, Proceedings of the Dorset Natural History and Archaeological Society (1959), 80, 91–3.Google Scholar

15 Roberts, G., The History of Lyme-Regis, Sherborne, 1823, 128.Google Scholar

16 Cunnington MSS at Wiltshire Archaeological Society Library, Devizes.

17 Howe, S. R., Sharpe, T. and Torrens, H. S., Ichthyosaurs: A History of Fossil ‘Sea-dragons’, Cardiff, 1981, 12.Google Scholar

18 SirHome, E., ‘Some account of the fossil remains of an animal…’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (1814), 104, 571–7 and plates 17–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19 Howe, et al. , op. cit. (17), 9.Google Scholar

20 Brooks, J., ‘Remarks on fossil remains’, The Medical and Physical Journal (1811), 25, 97–101Google Scholar and plate.

21 Adam, K. D., ‘Ichthyosaurier aus dem schwäbischen Jura. Ein Beitrag zur Forschungsgeschichte’, in Das Naturkundemuseum braucht unsere Hilfe. Katalog zur Ausstellung in der Girokasse… Stuttgart, 8 Februar bis 5 März 1971, Stuttgart, 1971, 12–16.Google Scholar

22 Dorset County Record Office, PE/LR OV 6.

23 Alexander, E. P., ‘William Bullock: little-remembered museologist and showman’, Curator (1985), 28, 117–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

24 Sale Catalogue of the Bullock Museum 1819, facsimile reprint, London: Harmer Johnson and John Hewett, 1979, ninth day, 63, lot 100*.

25 Edmonds, J. M., ‘The fossil collection of the Misses Philpot of Lyme Regis’, Proceedings of the Dorset Natural History and Archaeological Society (1978), 98, 43–53.Google Scholar

26 Koenig, C., Synopsis of the Contents of the British Museum, 11th edn, London, 1817, 54.Google Scholar

27 Torrens, H. S., ‘Colonel Birch (c. 1768–1829)’, Newsletter of the Geological Curators Group (1979), 2, 405–12Google Scholar and The Geological Curator (1980), 2, 561–2.Google Scholar

28 Roberts, G., The History and Antiquities of the Borough of Lyme Regis, London, 1834, 290.Google Scholar

29 Mantell MSS, Alexander Turnbull Library, Wellington, New Zealand.

30 A Catalogue of… Organised Fossils… the Genuine Property of Colonel Birch, which will be Sold by Auction by Mr Bullock 15 May 1820, London, 1820.Google Scholar The Anning family copy, signed ‘Joseph Anning May 12 1820’, is in the Palaeontology Library, Natural History Museum, London.

31 Like the letter wrongly dated 20 July 1820 by Sarjeant, W. A. S. and Delair, J. B., ‘An Irish naturalist in Cuvier's laboratory. The letters of Joseph Pentland 1820–1832’. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Historical Series (1980), 6, 245–319, especially 257–61.Google Scholar The correct date is 1821, after the Birch sale.

32 Torrens, , op. cit. (27), 407.Google Scholar

33 British Library, Add MSS 36520.

34 Cambridge University Library, Sedgwick Museum archives; see Price, D., ‘Mary Anning specimens in the Sedgwick Museum, Cambridge’, The Geological Curator (1986), 4, 319–24.Google Scholar

35 De la Beche, H. and Conybeare, W. D., ‘Notice of the discovery of a new fossil animal…’, Transactions of the Geological Society of London (1821), 5, 559–94 and plates 40–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

36 British Museum archives, letter bound in C 1467 but wrongly dated 1820.

37 Rolfe, W. D. I., Milner, A. C. and Hay, F. G., ‘The price of fossils’, Special Papers in Palaeontology (1988), 40, 139–71, on 149.Google Scholar

38 Bristol Mirror, 11 01 1823, 4.Google Scholar

39 Taylor, M. A. and Torrens, H. S., ‘Saleswoman to a new science’, Proceedings of the Dorset Natural History and Archaeological Society (1987), 108, 135–48, on 139Google Scholar, and Taylor, M. A., ‘The plesiosaur's birthplace’, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society (1994), 112, 179–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

40 Western Flying Post, 15 12 1823.Google Scholar

41 Conybeare, W., ‘On the discovery of an almost perfect skeleton of the Plesiosaurus’, Transactions of the Geological Society of London (1824), 1, 381–9 and plates 48–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

42 Buckland, W., ‘Notice on the Megalosaurus or great fossil lizard of Stonesfield’, Transactions of the Geological Society of London (1824), 1, 390–6 and plates 40–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

43 Taylor, and Torrens, , op. cit. (39), 143.Google Scholar

44 Buckland, W., Geology and Mineralogy Considered with Reference to Natural Theology, 2 vols., London, 1836, i, 202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

45 Rudwick, M. J. S., The Great Devonian Controversy, Chicago, 1985, 425CrossRefGoogle Scholar, claims that ‘Mary's finds were accepted without question’ but this was clearly true only after 1824.

46 Notebook of Thomas Allan, ‘Travels in England 1813–1824’, Palaeontology Library, Natural History Museum, London.

47 Murray, J., ‘The late Miss Mary Anning’, Mining Journal, 11 12 1847, 591.Google Scholar

48 Welch, E., ‘Lady Silvester's tour through Devonshire in 1824’, Devon and Cornwall Notes and Queries (1967), 30, 313 and (1973), 32, 265–6.Google Scholar

49 E.B. and Berkeley, D. S., George William Featherstonhaugh, the First US Government Geologist, Tuscaloosa, 1988, 66.Google Scholar

50 Buckland, W., ‘Fossil sepia’, London and Edinburgh Philosophical Magazine (1829), 5, 388.Google Scholar

51 Buckland, , op. cit. (44), ii, plate 44″, fig. 1.Google Scholar

52 See Purcell, R. W. and Gould, S. J., Finders, Keepers: Eight Collectors. With Photographs by Rosamond W. Purcell, Text by Stephen J. Gould, London, 1992, 103, fig. 72.Google Scholar

53 Rupke, N. A., The Great Chain of History, Oxford, 1983, 142.Google Scholar

54 Berkeley, and Berkeley, , op. cit. (49), 82–3.Google Scholar

55 Buckland, W., ‘On the discovery of coprolites, or fossil faeces in the lias at Lyme Regis…’, Transactions of the Geological Society of London (1829), 2nd series 3, 223–36, on 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

56 Buckland, W., ‘On the discovery of a new species of pterodactyle in the lias at Lyme Regis’, Transactions of the Geological Society of London (1829), 2nd series 3, 217–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

57 Fowles, J., in Lyme Regis Museum Curator's Report for 1983, Lyme, 1984, 27.Google Scholar

58 Bickley, F., Where Dorset Meets Devon, London, 1911, 55.Google Scholar

59 Trewman's Exeter Flying Post, 7 05 1829, 3.Google Scholar

60 Bath and Cheltenham Gazette, 28 04 1829, 3Google Scholar, and Buckland, to Featherstonhaugh, 23 03 1829Google Scholar, Sedgwick MSS, Cambridge University Library, Add 7652 II LL 21 C.

61 The supposed ‘first stirrings of the movement to retain objects where they are found’, claimed for the Melbourne meteorites in the 1860s, by Lucas, A. M. et al. , ‘Colonial pride and metropolitan expectations’, BJHS (1994), 27, 65–87, on 82CrossRefGoogle Scholar, are thirty years later than this thrust from Lyme Regis.

62 Owen MSS, Natural History Museum, London, OC 62.1/153–4.

63 Taylor, and Torrens, , op. cit. (39).Google Scholar

64 A Catalogue of the Celebrated and Extensive Collection of Fossils, Minerals, &c the Genuine Property of James Johnson Esq…, Bristol, 1845, 17 (lot 364).Google Scholar

65 Lyell, Charles to Mantell, Gideon, 13 05 1830Google Scholar, Mantell MSS, Alexander Turnbull Library, Wellington, New Zealand.

66 Rudwick, M. J. S., Scenes from Deep Time, Chicago, 1992.Google Scholar

67 Owen, R., ‘A description of a specimen of the Plesiosaurus macrocephalus, Conybeare in the collection of Viscount Cole’, Transactions of the Geological Society of London (1840), 2nd series 5, 515–35 and plates 43–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

68 Curwen, E. C. (ed.), The Journal of Gideon Mantell… 1818–1852, London, 1940, 108.Google Scholar

69 Aurousseau, M. (ed.), The Letters of F. W. Ludwig Leichhardt, 3 vols., Cambridge, 1968, i, 232.Google Scholar

70 Carus, C. G., The King of Saxony's Journey through England and Scotland in the year 1844, London, 1844, 197.Google Scholar

71 Natural History Museum, London, Reg. nos. 14398–40.

72 [G. Roberts 1847] ‘A brief memoir of Miss Mary Anning, the celebrated fossilist’. Eyles MSS, Bristol University Library.

73 Roberts, , op. cit. (28)Google Scholar, copy annotated by the author and preserved in Lyme Regis Museum, opposite 290.

74 Letter from Buckland, W. to SirTrevelyan, Walter, 10 10 [1846]Google Scholar, British Library, Add MSS 31026/247.

75 Minutes of the Council of the Dorset County Museum, 2 July 1846, Dorchester.

76 Roberts, , op. cit. (15), 128.Google Scholar

77 Fowles, J., A Short History of Lyme Regis, Wimborne, 1991, 5.Google Scholar

78 Roberts, , op. cit. (28), 290.Google Scholar

79 De la Beche, H., Obituary notices, Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London (1848), 4, pp. xxiv–xxv.Google Scholar

80 As the De la Beche archive in the National Museum in Cardiff reveals.

81 Lang, W. D., ‘Mary Anning, of Lyme, collector and vendor of fossils, 1799–1847’, Natural History Magazine (1936), 5, 64–81, on 80.Google Scholar

82 Roberts, , op. cit. (28), opposite 290.Google Scholar

83 The Times, 6 02 1939, 13.Google Scholar

84 Roberts, G., ‘The fossil-finder of Lyme Regis’, Chambers Journal of Popular Literature (1857), 7, 382–4.Google Scholar

85 Anon. [?Dickens, C.], ‘Mary Anning, the fossil-finder’, All the Year Round (1865), 13, 60–3.Google Scholar

86 Dorset County Record Office, PPR/CW 1858 160/120.

87 Brown, H. R., The Beauties of Lyme Regis, Lyme Regis, 1857, 30.Google Scholar

88 DNB, supplement, 1901, xxii, 51–2.Google Scholar

89 Sherborn, C. D., ‘Bernard Barham Woodward 1853–1930’, Naturalist, 1 12 1930, 437–8.Google Scholar

90 Natural History Museum, London, Reg. no. 2003.

91 Burke's Landed Centry, 18th edn, 3 vols., London, 1972, iii, 236.Google Scholar

92 Darton, F. J. H., The Marches of Wessex, London, 1922.Google Scholar

93 Darton, F. J. H., Children's Books in England, Cambridge, 1932.Google Scholar

94 Wells Gardner, Darton and Co.'s catalogue, bound into Avery, H., With Wellington at Waterloo, 1907Google Scholar, notes that H. A. Forde was already dead.

95 The Times, 13 08 1896, 1.Google Scholar

96 Forde, F., Parentalia: Reminiscences of… fforde of fforde Grene etc, London, 1878Google Scholar (copy in Boston Public Library, USA).

97 The Times, 30 07 1928, 1.Google Scholar

98 A pedigree of the Forde family appears in Ormerod, G., The History of the County… of Cheshire, 2nd edn, 3 vols., London, 1882, iii, 101–2.Google Scholar

99 Lang, W. D., ‘Mary Anning (1799–1847) and the pioneer geologists of Lyme’, Proceedings of the Dorset Natural History and Archaeological Society (1939), 60, 142–64, on 144.Google Scholar

100 Watney, M., The Morning Post, 4 02 1931, 8.Google Scholar

101 Anon., The Sunday Companion, 1 08 1931.Google Scholar

102 Mee, A. (ed.), Children's Encyclopaedia London, 1925, iiiGoogle Scholar, 1509 and [1953], iii, 1509. By 1946 Mee's biographer, John Hammerton, estimated that 52 million volumes of the Children's Encyclopaedia had been sold; see Pound, R. and Harmsworth, G., Northcliffe, London, 1959, 295.Google Scholar It is better known in the United States as The Book of Knowledge and has been translated into French, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Arabic and Chinese (see DNB 1941–50, 584–5, sub Mee).

103 White, E. I., ‘William Dickson Lang’, Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society (1966), 12, 367–86.Google Scholar

104 Lang, W. D., ‘Mary Anning and a very small boy’, Proceedings of the Dorset Natural History and Archaeological Society (1963), 84, 181–2.Google Scholar

105 Hawkes, J., A Land, London, 1951, 59.Google Scholar

106 Hawkes, J., Man on Earth, London, 1954, 63.Google Scholar

107 Andrews, R. C.All about Dinosaurs, London, 1959, 17.Google Scholar

108 Bush, H. B., Treasures in the Rock, Toronto, 1960.Google Scholar

109 Bush, H. B., Mary Anning's Treasures, New York, 1966.Google Scholar

110 Bush, H. B., Mary Anning's Treasures, London, 1967.Google Scholar

111 Bush, H. B., Mary Anning's Treasures, London: Puffin Books, 1976.Google Scholar

112 Copy in Lyme Regis Museum.

113 Tully, J., The Crocodile, London, 1972.Google Scholar

114 Natural History Museum, London, no. Reg 1158, see Delair, J. B., ‘A history of the early discoveries of liassic ichthyosaurs in Dorset and Somerset (1779–1835)’, Proceedings of the Dorset Natural History and Archaeological Society (1969), 90, 115–27, on 121.Google Scholar

115 van N. Blair, R., Mary's Monster, New York, 1975.Google Scholar

116 Gordon, E. O., The Life and Correspondence of William Buckland, London, 1894, 7.Google Scholar

117 Fradin, D. B., Remarkable Children – Twenty who made History, Boston, 1987.Google Scholar

118 Day, M., Dragon in the Rocks, Toronto and Buffalo, 1991.Google Scholar

119 Cole, S., Dragon in the Cliff, New York, 1991.Google Scholar

120 Fowles, J., in Lyme Regis Museum Curator's Report for 1991, Lyme Regis, 1992, 31.Google Scholar

121 Fowles, , op. cit. (77), 41Google Scholar, and see his ‘Introduction’ to a forthcoming pamphlet on Mary Aiming by Sir Crispin Tickell (a direct descendant of Mary's brother Joseph), to be published in 1995 by Lyme Regis Museum.

122 See Sharpe, J., ‘History from below’, in New Perspectives on Historical Writing (ed. Burke, P.), Cambridge, 1991, 24–41, on 36.Google Scholar

123 Washburn, , op. cit. (1).Google Scholar

124 Taylor, and Torrens, , op. cit. (39), 143.Google Scholar

125 Nicolson, N., ‘Tricks of the memory’, The Spectator, 12 03 1994, 41–2Google Scholar

126 Norman, J. R., Squire: Memories of Charles Davies Sherborn, London, 1944, 65 and 88Google Scholar, and Gruber, J. W., ‘The Richard Owen correspondence: an introductory essay’, in Gruber, J. W. and Thackray, J. C., Richard Owen Commemoration, London, 1992, 1–93, especially 1–6.Google Scholar

127 Gruber, and Thackray, , op. cit. (126)Google Scholar, ‘A catalogue of the correspondence… of Richard Owen’. This notes two items of correspondence and three other Anning MSS in this archive, on 107, 114 and 141.

128 Sheets-Pyenson, S., ‘Geological communication in the nineteenth century’, Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Historical Series (1982), 10, 179–226, on 200.Google Scholar

129 Professor G. M. Friedman collection, Troy, USA.

130 Dorset County Museum, NHMS XXXVII/2.

131 Barber, L., The Heyday of Natural History, New York, 1980, 127.Google Scholar

132 Taylor, and Torrens, , op. cit. (39).Google Scholar

133 Gould, , op. cit. (52), 100.Google Scholar

134 Standing Committee Minutes of the British Museum, C 5494, 14 November 1840, British Museum archives.

135 Torrens, H. S. and Cooper, J. A., ‘George Fleming Richardson (1796–1848) – man of letters, lecturer and geological curator’, Geological Curator (1986), 4, 249–72, on 256Google Scholar, and Hewitt, R. A., ‘London clay nautiloid collections’Google Scholar, ibid. (1995), 6, 117–24, on 119.

136 Natural History Museum archives, NS: Additions, Geology, 12001–16000, 75.

137 Simpson, G. G., Concession to the Improbable, New Haven, CT, 1978, 44–5.Google Scholar

138 Spamer, E. E. et al. , ‘Recovery of the Etheldred Benett collection of fossils…’, Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia (1989), 141, 115–80, on 118.Google Scholar

139 No references appear in the Society's MSS books and there is no reference either in Moore, D. T., Thackray, J. C. and Morgan, D. L., ‘A short history of the museum of the Geological Society of London 1807–1911…’, Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History, Historical Series (1991), 19, 51–160.Google Scholar

140 Price, op. cit. (34).Google Scholar

141 Taylor, , op. cit. (39).Google Scholar

142 Taylor, and Torrens, , op. cit. (39).Google Scholar

143 Murchison, R. I., ‘Presidential address’, Proceedings of the Geological Society of London (1832), 1, 362–86, on 385–6.Google Scholar

144 In experimental science, the instrument makers and technicians are as important as the scientists but only more recently has the history of instrumentation become an object for serious study, see Shapin, S., ‘Le technicien invisible’, La Recherche (1991), 22, 324–33.Google Scholar

145 See Murray, , op. cit. (47)Google Scholar. Another such ‘hunter’, Alfred Jaeger (1860–1909), ‘Nimrod’ of Elgar's Enigma Variations, can remind us of such relationships in music. Here composition and performance are both vital, are equally regarded and have been equally recorded in history. See his comments in Moore, J. N. (ed.), Elgar and his Publishers, 2 vols., Oxford, 1987, ii, 715.Google Scholar

146 Fowles, J., The French Lieutenant's Woman, London, 1969, 53.Google Scholar

147 In 1878 R. F. Tomes (1823–1904) apparently named his new liassic coral genus and species Tricycloseris anningi, from Charmouth, after her (Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London (1878), 34, 189–90Google Scholar and plate 9, fig. 1). In 1936 L. R. Cox (1897–1965) named the bivalve genus Anningia after her (Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London (1936), 92, 468 and plate 34, fig. 9–10)Google Scholar, but this had to be renamed Anningella in 1958 because of homonymy (see Proceedings of the Geological Society of London (1958), 1557, 44)Google Scholar. The ostracod species, Cytherelloidea anningi, has been named since 1969, by Lord, Alan, ‘Ostracods from the Domerian and Toarcian of England’, Palaeontology (1974), 17, 599–622 and plate 90, especially 610–13 and figs. 4–5.Google Scholar

148 Broom, R., ‘On a new type of mammal-like reptile from the South African Karroo Beds (Anningia megalops)’, Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London (1928), for 1927, 227–32.Google Scholar

149 Broom, R., The Mammal-Like Reptiles of South Africa, London, 1932, ch. 2.Google Scholar

150 Colbert, E. H., Digging into the Past, New York, 1989, 191–2.Google Scholar Today Anningia entirely fails to honour its dedicatee, see Reisz, R. R. and Dilkes, D. W., ‘The taxonomic position of Anningia megalops,…’, Canadian Journal of Earth Science (1992), 29, 1605–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

151 Cumberland, G., ‘Some account of the order in which the fossil saurians were discovered’, Quarterly Journal of Literature, Science and the Arts (1829), 27, 345–9, on 348.Google Scholar

152 Först, H. J., ‘Material culture research and the curation process’, in Museum Studies in Material Culture (ed. Pearce, S. M.), Leicester, 1989, 97–110, on 106.Google Scholar

153 Jones, S., in Journal of the History of Collections (1990), 2, 87–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

154 Washburn, , op. cit. (1), 249.Google Scholar

155 See also New Scientist (30 01 1993), 137 (1858), 10.Google Scholar

156 I am glad to report that, as a result of recent publicity, attitudes have started to change and Mary Anning's achievements are now properly announced to visitors in the Museum's wonderful marine reptile gallery.

157 Greene, M. T., ‘History of geology’, Osiris (1985), 1, 97–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar, for example, provides a summary of only printed sources for the history of geology and concludes that the history of geology is at such a premature stage that ‘it is as yet too early to go to the archives’. The possibility of other sources was not considered.

158 Schaef, A. W., Meditations for Women who do too much (1990), San Francisco, entry for 2 May.Google Scholar

159 Henry De la Beche's Duria antiquior.

160 Kenyon, J., Poems: For the Most Part Occasional, London, 1838, 109–11.Google Scholar

161 Hawkes, , op. cit. (105).Google Scholar

162 Fowles, , op. cit. (146).Google Scholar

163 Angharad Wynne-Jones' ‘Mary Anning – a natural history’, danced at the Chisenhale Dance Space, London, 3 July 1987.

164 Creese, M. R. S. and Creese, T. M., ‘British women who contributed to research in the geological sciences in the nineteenth century’, BJHS (1994), 27, 23–54, on 27–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

165 Ackroyd, Peter, ‘Review of Hardy by Martin Seymour-Smith’, The Times, 20 01 1994, 41Google Scholar, and see also 7 and 19.

166 Mount, F., ‘A little less learning’, Daily Telegraph, 11 12 1993.Google Scholar

167 Charlesworth, K., New Scientist (3 12 1988), 120 (1641), 60Google Scholar and reproduced with kind permission.