Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:50:58.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Geological Ideas of J. J. Berzelius

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Tore Frängsmyr
Tore Frängsmyr
Affiliation:
Institutionen för idé- och läardomshistoria, Uppsala Universitet, Ö. Slottsgatan 12, S-75235 Uppsala, Sweden.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The development of geology during the first half of the nineteenth century is now considered to be more complicated than was once thought. The positivistic picture of two conflicting schools, one of them allegedly modern and progressive, the other supposedly conservative and scriptural, is too simplistic and misleading. First, the influence of the Bible has been exaggerated. It is true that in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries the Flood had been given an important role as a geological agent, but in the early nineteenth century there were hardly any professional geologists who defended this view. At least, it is not correct to associate either neptunism, catastrophism, or diluvialism with the Mosaic tradition. Secondly, the use of such terms as ‘catastrophism’ and ‘diluvialism’ has been unfortunate in so far as they have led to biblical associations; these terms must be given a more precise meaning. Thirdly, in the evaluation of the geology of the period, not enough weight has been given to the historical context. From our knowledge of modern geology alone it is not possible to judge what was loose speculation or empirical science at that time. Lyell's contributions to geology, as well as those of his opponents, should be considered and examined in more detail.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal for the History of Science , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , July 1976 , pp. 228 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © British Society for the History of Science 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 See, for instance, Cannon, W. F., ‘The Uniformitarian-Catastrophist debate’, Isis, li (1960), 38–55;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudwick, M. J. S., ‘Uniformity and progression: reflections on the structure of geological theory in the age of Lyell’, in Roller, Duane H. D. (ed.), Perspectives in the history of science and technology (Norman, Oklahoma, 1971), pp. 209–27; andGoogle Scholar
Page, L. E., ‘Diluvialism and its critics in Great Britain in the early nineteenth century’, in Schneer, Cecil J. (ed.), Toward a history of geology (Cambridge, Mass., 1969), pp. 257–71.Google Scholar
2Berzelius, J. J., Årsberättelse om framstegen i physik och chamie, (1821–1847),Google Scholar
in the series Kungliga Vetenskapsakademien; Årsberättelser om vetenskapernas framsteg (Stockholm, 1821–1847).Google Scholar
German translation: Jahresbericht über die Fortschritte der physischen Wissenschaften (27 vols., Tübingen, 1822–1848).Google Scholar
3Årsberättelse, (1821), p. 163.Google Scholar
4Berzelius, J. J., (1826), pp. 297–304.Google Scholar
5Keilhau, B. M., ‘Ein vorläfiges Wort über Contact-bildungen’, Annalen der Physik und Chemie (ed. J. C. Poggendorff), xiv (1828), 131–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The numbers of the volumes are confusing, because Poggendorff, when he took over the journal, started with a new series but kept the old numbering as well. Hence the volume just referred to has both the numbers xiv and xc. In this paper I shall use the new system of notation, which was also most usual in Berzelius's time. See also Keilhau, , ‘Granitens og de övrige saakaldte massive bjergarters samt de krystalliniske skiferes theorie’, Nyt magazin for naturvidenskaberne, i (1838), 44–5, 50–2, 61;Google Scholar
Berzelius, , Årsberättelse, (1829), pp. 278–9; (1837), pp. 360–71.Google Scholar
6Årsberättelse, (1837), pp. 369–70.Google Scholar
7Studer, B., ‘On the origin of granite’, Edinburgh new philosophical journal, xxix (1840), 296–309.Google Scholar
8Årsberättelse, (1841), pp. 443–4.Google Scholar
9Fourier, , ‘Extrait d'un mémoire sur le refroidissement séculaire du globe terrestre’, Annales de chimie et de physique, xiii (1820), 418–38,Google Scholar
and ‘Mémoire sur les températures du globe terrestre et des espaces planétaires’, Mémoires de l'Académie des Sciences de l'Institut de France, vii (1827), 569–604.Google Scholar
Cordier, , ‘Essai sur la température de l'intérieur de la terre’, Mémoires de l'Académie des Sciences, vii (1827), 473–555. Berzelius refers to a reprint of Cordier's article in Annales des mines, xii (1827), 53–138.Google Scholar
His comments in Årsberättelse, (1822), pp. 149–51; (1823), p. 221; (1828), p. 318; (1830), pp. 260–1; (1832), p. 344; (1834), p. 391.Google Scholar
10Årsberättelse, (1828), p. 318. Cf.Google Scholar
Cordier, , op. cit. (9), p. 536.Google Scholar
11Årsberättelse, (1821), pp. 178–9.Google Scholar
12de Beaumont, Élie, ‘Recherches sur quelques-unes des révolutions de la surface du globe’, Annales des sciences naturelles, xviii (1829), 5–25, 284–416;Google Scholar
xvix (1830), 5–99, 177–240. Berzelius refers to a summary of this article: ‘Rapport sur un mémoire de M. Beaumont’, Annales de chimie et de physique, xlii (1829), 284–302;Google Scholar
see Årsberättelse, (1830), pp. 255–6.Google Scholar
13Årsberättelse, (1833), pp. 399–403 (402). Cf.Google Scholar
‘Zweiter geologischer Brief des Hrn. Elie de Beaumont an Hrn. Alexander v. Humboldt über das relative Alter der Gebirgszüge’, Annalen der Physik und Chimie (ed. Pogendorff, J. C.), xxv (1832), 1–58 (52).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Sedgwick, A., ‘Address to the Geological Society, delivered on the evening of 18th February 1831’, Proceedings of the Geological Society of London, i (1831), 281–316.Google Scholar
15Sedgwick, A., p. 308.Google Scholar
16Conybeare, W. D., ‘Inquiry how far the theory of M. Élie de Beaumont concerning the parallelism of lines of elevation of the same geological area, is agreeable to the phenomena as exhibited in Great Britain’, Philosophical magazine and journal of science, i (1832), 118–26.Google Scholar
Berzelius, , Årsberättelse, (1833), pp. 402–3.Google Scholar
17 [Mrs] Lyell, K. M. (ed.), Life, letters and journals of Sir Charles Lyell, Bart. (2 vols., London, 1881), i. 427–8, 452.Google Scholar
18Årsberättelse, (1835), p. 462.Google Scholar
Wilson, L. G., Charles Lyell. The Years to 1841: the revolution in geology (New Haven and London, 1972), p. 405.Google Scholar
19 T. Frängsmyr, Geologi och skapelsetro. Föreställningar om jordens historia från Hiärne till Bergman (Summary in English: Geology and the doctrine of the creation. Ideas about the earth's history from Hiärne to Bergman), (Lychnos-Bibliotek, , vol. xxvi, Uppsala, 1969), chapter I.Google Scholar
20Årsberättelse, (1834), p. 392;Google Scholar
(1837), pp. 386–90. Cf. Nilsson, S., ‘Föredrag’, Förhandlingar vid skandinaviska naturforskaremötet 1839 (Göteborg, 1840), pp. 129–30,Google Scholar
and Skandinavisk fauna (2nd edn., Lund, 1847), i. p. viii.Google Scholar
Pingel, P. C., ‘A notice of some facts showing the gradual sinking of part of the West coast of Greenland’, The London and Edinburgh philosophical magazine and journal of science, viii (1836), 73–4.Google Scholar
21Sefström, N. G., ‘Undersökning af de räfflor, havaraf Skandinaviens berg äro med bestämd riktning fårade, samt om deras sannolika uppkomät’, Kungliga Vetenskapsakademiens handlingar 1836 (1838), pp. 141–255.Google Scholar
German translation: ‘Untersuchungen über die auf den Felsen Skandinaviens in bestimmter Richtung vorhandenden Furchen und deren wahrscheinliche Entstehung’, Annalen der Physik und Chimie (ed. Poggendorff, J. C.), xliii (1838), 533–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
English summary: ‘On the traces of a vast ancient flood’, Edinburgh new philosophical journal, xxiii (1837), 69–73.Google Scholar
22Årsberättelse, (1841), pp. 445–6.Google Scholar
23Poggendorff, J. C., (1837), p. 395.Google Scholar
Berzelius refers to the English translation of Charpentier's paper: ‘Account of one of the most important results of the investigations of M. Venetz’, Edinburgh new philosophical journal, xxi (1836), 210–20.Google Scholar
24Årsberättelse, (1841), pp. 447–8; (1842), pp. 449–53.Google Scholar
25Poggendorff, J. C., (1842), pp. 453–56.Google Scholar
Murchison, (and Verneuil), ‘On the geological structure of the northern and central regions of Russia in Europe’, The London and Edinburgh philosophical magazine and journal of science, xix (1842), 496.Google Scholar
26 Cf. Rudwick, M. J. S., ‘The glacial theory’, History of science, viii (1970), 145–6.Google Scholar
27Årsberättelse, (1842), p. 450.Google Scholar
Also Berzelius's speech at the meeting of Scandinavian scientists, in Förhandlingar vid de skandinaviske naturforskarnes tredje möote i Stockholm 1842 (Stockholm, 1843), pp. 24–5.Google Scholar
28Årsberättelse, (1821), p. 163; (1830), pp. 254–5; (1837), pp. 366–7.Google Scholar
29Rudwick, M. J. S., (1821), p. 171; (1823), pp. 224–5; (1824), pp. 275–6, 287–8; (1825), p. 294.Google Scholar
30Rudwick, M. J. S., (1831), pp. 348–9, 352–3. Cf.Google Scholar
Davy, H., Consolations in travel, or the last days of a philosopher (London, 1830), pp. 124–38 (131).Google Scholar
31Davy, , op. cit. (30), pp. 137–8.Google Scholar
32Årsberättelse, (1837), p. 401.Google Scholar
33Davy, , p. 372.Google Scholar
Also Berzelius, 's article ‘Om beskaffenheten af Sweriges berg och mark’, Läsning för folklet, (1839), pp. 310–86, especially pp. 384–6.Google Scholar
34Årsberättelse, (1830), p. 251. Cf.Google Scholar
Ure, A., A new system of geology, in which the revolutions of the earth and animated nature are reconciled at once to modern science and sacred history (London, 1829).Google Scholar
35Årsberättelse, (1838), pp. 620–7. Cf.Google Scholar
Bischof, G., Die Wärmelehre des Innern unsers Erdkörpers (Leipzig, 1837).Google Scholar
36Årsberättelse, (1830), p. 253.Google Scholar
Brongniart, Adolphe, ‘Allgemeine Betrachtungen über die Vegetation, welche die Erdrinde in den verschiedenen Perioden ihrer Bildung bedeckte’, Annalen der Physik und Chimie (ed. J. C. Poggendorff), xv (1829), 385–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar