Article contents
Dr. Thomas Beddoes (1750–1808): Science and medicine in politics and society
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 January 2009
Extract
The career of Thomas Beddoes was moulded by British responses to the French Revolution. Beddoes, until appalled by the events of the Terror, saw France as the model for mankind. The government of England took the very different view that democracy was closely allied with jacobinism and sedition. The Home Office was the agency most immediately engaged in opposing sedition, and any criticism of the King, or of the constitution in church and state, was scrutinized as being potentially seditious. In 1793, England and France went to war, and the following years saw treason trials and gagging bills, profoundly disturbing even to the more conservative among the friends of peace and liberty in England, Beddoes among them.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © British Society for the History of Science 1984
References
1 For the ideological role of science in the French Revolution, see Fayet, J., La revolution française et la science, 1789–1795, Paris, 1960Google Scholar; Maindron, E., L'Académie des Sciences, Paris, 1888Google Scholar; Williams, L. P., ‘Science, education and Napoleon I’, Isis, 1956, 47, 368–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Guerlac, H., ‘Lavoisier’, D.S.B., viii, 69–91.Google Scholar
2 Emsley, C., ‘The home office and its sources of information and investigation 1791–1801’. English Historical Review, 1979, 94, 532–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarNelson, R. R., The Home Office, 1782–1801, Durham, North Carolina, 1969.Google ScholarGoodwin, A., The Friends of Liberty. The English democratic movement in the age of the French Revolution, Cambridge, Mass., 1979Google Scholar. Cookson, J. E., The Friends of Peace. Anti-war Liberalism in England, 1793–1815, Cambridge, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Schofield, R. E., The Lunar Society of Birmingham, Oxford, 1963.Google ScholarRose, R. B., ‘The Priestley Riots of 1791’, Past and Present, 1960, 18, 68–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Hennock, E. P., ‘Urban sanitary reform a generation before Chadwick’, Econ. Hist. Rev., 1957, II, 10, 113–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarHamilton, B., ‘The medical profession in the XVIIIth century’, Econ. Hist. Rev., 1951, II, 4, 148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarHannaway, C. C., ‘The Société Royal de Médicine and epidemics in the Ancien Régime’, Bull. Hist. Med., 1972, 46, 257–73.Google ScholarVess, David M., Medical Revolution in France 1789–1796, Gainsville, Fla., 1975.Google ScholarGelfand, Toby, Professionalizing Modern Medicine: Paris Surgeons and Medical Science and Institutions in the Eighteenth Century, Contributions to Medical History, Westport, Conn., and London, 1980.Google Scholar For the fashionable French view of hygiene, see Foucault, M., Power/Knowledge, ed. Gordon, C., New York, 1980, 166–82.Google ScholarGoubert, J.-P., ‘L'art de guérir: Médecine savante et médecine populaire dans la France de 1790’, Ann. Écon. Soc. Civilisations, 1977, 32, 908–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar The standard article on French hygiene, for a slightly later period, is Ackerknecht, E., ‘Hygiene in France, 1815–1848’, Bull. Hist. Med., 1948, 22, 117–155.Google Scholar
5 Levere, T. H., ‘Dr. Thomas Beddoes and the establishment of his Pneumatic Institution’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London, 1977, 32, 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Coleridge, , The Watchman, 17 03 1796.Google ScholarRobinson, E., ‘An English Jacobin: James Watt, Junior, 1769–1848’, Cambridge Historical Journal, 1955, 349–55.Google Scholar
7 Goodwin, , op. cit. (2), 100.Google Scholar
8 Beddoes, to Giddy, , 5 05 and [?26] 05 1791Google Scholar: Davies-Giddy (DG) papers, Cornwall Record Office (CRO), MSS DG 41/6 & 41/15.
9 Goodwin, , 180–183.Google ScholarRose, , op. cit. (3), 76.Google Scholar
10 Thomas Day, 1748–1789, another of the Lunar circle. Schofield, , op. cit. (3), 52.Google Scholar
11 Beddoes, to [Giddy, ], 21 11 1791.Google Scholar MS DG 41/48, CRO.
12 Beddoes, to Giddy, 4 11 1791.Google Scholar MS DG/41, CRO.
13 Beddoes, , Letter on Early Instruction, 1792, 1, 20.Google Scholar
14 MS DG 41/50, CRO, 3 April 1792. Public Record Office (PRO) MS TS 11 962/3508, 19 April 1792.
15 Thompson, E. P., ‘The moral economy of the English crowd in the eighteenth century’, Past and Present, 1971, 50, 76–136 at 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 Goodwin, , op. cit. (2), 200.Google ScholarRobinson, , op. cit. (6)Google Scholar. Beddoes, to Giddy, 4 07 1792Google Scholar, MS DG 41/16, CRO.
17 Stansfield, Dorothy, ‘Thomas Beddoes and education’, History of Education Society Bulletin, 1979, 23, 7–14.Google Scholar
18 MS note by Wm. Anstice, 9 Oct. 1819, in Yale University's copy of Alexander's Expedition.
19 Guilford, to [Dundas, ] [7] 07 1792Google Scholar, Willough, C. by to Guilford, 11 07 1792Google Scholar. Cooke, J. to Guilford, 16 07, 1792Google Scholar, in PRO MSS HO 42.21, 42.208. Beddoes to Giddy, MS DG 41/22, CRO 1793.
20 Willough, by to Dundas, , 21 07 1792Google Scholar, PRO MS HO 42.208.
21 Levere, T. H., ‘Dr. Thomas Beddoes at Oxford: Radical Politics in 1788–1793 and the Fate of the Regius Chair in Chemistry’, Ambix, 1981, 28, 61–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22 Nepean, E. to Browne, I. H., 1 11 1792Google Scholar, PRO MS HO 42.22.
23 Money, J., Experience and Identity. Birmingham and the West Midlands 1760–1800, Manchester, 1977, 225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarRobinson, E., ‘The Derby Philosophical Society’, Annals of Science, 1953, 9, 368–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar ‘Disaffected & seditious persons. Goodmans fields 28 July 1792’, PRO MS HO 42.21. For other scientific societies and sedition (mostly at a later date) see Inkster, Ian, ‘London Science and the Seditious Meetings Act of 1817’, BJHS, 1979, 12, 192–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Weindling, Paul, ‘Science and Sedition: How Effective Were the Acts Licensing Lectures and Meetings, 1795–1819?’, BJHS, 1980, 13, 139–53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Inkster, Ian, ‘Seditious Science: A Reply to Paul Weindling’, BJHS, 1981, 14, 181–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar For the relations between Beddoes and Erasmus Darwin, see Stock, J. E., Memoirs of the Life of Thomas Beddoes, M.D., London & Bristol, 1811Google Scholar; King-Hele, D., Doctor of Revolution: The Life and Genius of Erasmus Darwin, London, 1977Google Scholar; King-Hele, D. (ed.), The Letters of Erasmus Darwin, Cambridge, 1981.Google Scholar
24 Beddoes, to Giddy, , 19 11 1792Google Scholar, MS DG 41/38, CRO. Giddy had studied under Beddoes at Oxford and, as Davies Gilbert, was to succeed Davy as P.R.S. See Todd, A. C., Beyond the Blaze. A Biography of Davies Gilbert, Truro, 1967.Google ScholarBeddoes, , Reasons for believing the friends of liberty in France not to be the authors or abettors of the crimes committed in that country [1792]Google Scholar. Beddoes, to Giddy, , 21 10 & 8 11 1792Google Scholar, MSS DG 41/20, 41/5, CRO.
25 Beddoes, , A Letter to Erasmus Darwin, M.D., on a new method of treating pulmonary consumption, and some other diseases hitherto found incurable, Bristol, 1793, 28–29.Google Scholar
26 Todd, , op. cit. (24), 25.Google Scholar
27 Beddoes, , Hygëia; or Essays, Moral and Medical on the causes affecting the personal state of the middling and affluent classes, 3 vols., Bristol, 1802–1803, ii, 5.Google ScholarIbid., p. 6: ‘Of 1654 buried in one parish in Bristol 683 stand under the title of consumption or decline: and from a register at Shrewsbury it will be presently seen that for ten years, above one death in four is appropriated to consumption.’ Beddoes also gives figures for Chester, from Haygarth, J., ‘Observations on the Bill of Mortality in Chester, for the Year 1772’, Phil. Trans., 1774, 64, 67–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar, & ‘Bill of Mortality for Chester for the Year 1773’, Phil. Trans., 1775, 65, 85–90.Google Scholar
28 Nott, J., Of the Hotwell Waters, near Bristol, Bristol, 1793.Google ScholarWeber, C. A., Bristols Bedeutung für die englische Romantik …, Halle, 1935.Google Scholar
29 Beddoes, to Giddy, , MS DG 41/7, CRO, 31 07 1793.Google Scholar
30 Beddoes, to Giddy, , MS DG 41/28, CRO, 15 06 1793.Google Scholar
31 Beddoes, , op. cit. (25).Google Scholar
32 Beddoes, to Giddy, , 29 10 1793Google Scholar & June 1796; MSS DG 41/4, 42/20, CRO.
33 Rivington & Cooke.
34 The Golden Age, 6, 14.Google Scholar
35 Ibid., 3.
36 Rose, , op. cit. (3), 71Google Scholar; ‘Eighteenth-century price riots and public policy in England’, International Review of Social History, 1961, 6, 277–92.Google ScholarThompson, , op. cit. (15).Google Scholar
37 PRO MS HO 42.19, quoted in Money, , op. cit. (23), 227.Google Scholar
38 PRO MS HO 43.4, pp. 81 82. Emsley, , op. cit. (2)Google Scholar. Bristol Record Office (BRO), 1793 Box, MS 1 Oct. 1793. PRO MSS HO 42.26, 42.27, 43.4.
39 PRO MS TS 11, entries for 28 Jan. & 24 April 1794. Much useful light is shed on radical politics in London in the 1790's in The Autobiography of Francis Place (1771–1854), ed. Thale, M., Cambridge, 1972.Google Scholar
40 Beddoes, to Giddy, [? 01/02 1795]Google Scholar, MS DG 42/4, CRO.
41 Beddoes to Giddy, n.d., MS DG 42/36.
42 Beddoes, to Wedgwood, T., 03 ? 1795Google Scholar, MS W/K. Beddoes, to Giddy, , 14 03 1795Google Scholar, MS DG 42/30. Stern, W. M., ‘The bread crisis in Britain, 1795–6’, Economica, 1964, N.S., 31, 168–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 169 gives the monthly rise in the price of wheat in England and Wales.
43 Mayor of Bristol to Home Office, 13, 17, 18 March 1795; PRO MSS HO 42.29, 42.34, ‘Invasion’, PRO MS 42.40.
44 Star report of Bristol Guildhall Meetings of 17 & 20 Nov. 1795, reproduced with annotations in The Collected Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, general ed. K. Coburn: Lectures 1795 on Politics and Religion, ed. Patton, L. & Mann, P., London & Princeton, 1971Google Scholar, Appendix B1; Appendix B2 reproduces the Petition of the Inhabitants of Bristol Against the Two Bills, & Appendix B3 reproduces Beddoes, A Word in Defence of the Bill of Rights, Against Gagging Bills.
45 Beddoes, , An Essay…, 1796, 13, 155.Google Scholar Coleridge reviewed the work in The Watchman of 5 05 1796.Google Scholar
46 Fayet, , op. cit. (1).Google Scholar
47 PRO MSS 43.8, 43.9, 42.20, 43.10, 43.11, Jan. 1797 Aug. 1799.
48 Beddoes's career was in England, but part of his education had been at Edinburgh under Black. This may suffice to account for the Scottish support for Beddoes's Pneumatic Institution (Levere, , op. cit. (5))Google Scholar. One should also note the extent of democratic protest in Edinburgh in the years immediately preceding the treason trials of the 1790's (Goodwin, , op. cit. (2))Google Scholar. There were significant parallels between English and Scottish interactions between science and politics. See, e.g., Morrell, J. B., ‘The Leslie affair: Careers, Kirk, and politics in Edinburgh in 1805’, Scottish Historical Review, 1975, 54, 62–82Google Scholar, and ‘Professors Robison and Playfair, and the Theophobia Gallica: Natural Philosophy, religion and politics in Edinburgh, 1789–1815’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London, 1971, 26, 43–63.Google ScholarBeddoes, & Watt, J., Considerations on the Medicinal Use and Production of Factitious Airs, Bristol, 1795, Part 3, 111–12.Google Scholar
49 Sir J. Banks to Giorgiana, Duchess of Devonshire, 30 Nov. 1794, British Museum (Natural History) Dawson-Turner Collection, MS vol. 9 ff. 124–5. The correspondence is summarized in Dawson, W. R., The Banks Letters, London, 1958, pp. 207–8.Google ScholarWatt, J. Jr., to Ferriar, , 19 12 1794Google Scholar, Gibson-Watt MS 20.
50 Bristol Gazette, 21 03 1799.Google Scholar
51 Quoted in Beddoes, & Watt, , op. cit. (48), Part 3, ix.Google Scholar
52 Beddoes, to Giddy, , 1 06 1798Google Scholar, MS DG 42/37, CRO, Bristol Infirmary Biographical Memoirs, MS iv, 536–38Google Scholar, BRO. Other information about public lectures involving Beddoes is in ibid., 528–34; Beddoes, to Giddy, , 10 1797Google Scholar, MS DG 42/29, CRO; Beddoes, to Watt, J. Jr., 10 04 1798Google Scholar, Birmingham Public Libraries, M IV B. See also Inkster & Weindling, op. cit. (23).
53 Abbott, C. C., ‘The parents of T. L. Beddoes’, Durham University Journal, 1941–1942, N.S., 3, 159–175, 168.Google Scholar
54 Levere, T. H., ‘Dr. Thomas Beddoes. The Interaction of Pneumatic and Preventive Medicine with Chemistry’, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 1982, 7, 137–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar, elaborates and documents these and the following medical and chemical themes. Beddoes's most extensive Brunonian statement is in Brown, J., The Elements of Medicine, new ed., with biographical prefaces, introduction by T. Beddoes 2 vols London, 1795.Google Scholar
55 Priestley, J., Experiments and Observations relating to various branches of natural philosophy; with a continuation of the observations on air, Birmingham, 1785, iii, 321.Google Scholar For further details, see Levere, , op. cit. (54).Google Scholar
56 Beddoes did, however, criticize Brown's theory. See e.g. Davy, to Penneck, H., 26 01 1799Google Scholar, American Philosophical Society BD 315.1/1969–1821 MS.
57 The Collected Works of Sir Humphry Davy, Bart., ed. Davy, J., 9 vols., London, 1839, iii, 330.Google Scholar For Davy's attitude towards medicine and a medical career, see Neve, M., ‘The Young Humphry Davy: or John Tonkin's Lament’, in Science and the Sons of Genius. Studies on Humphry Davy, ed. Forgan, S., London, 1980, 1–32.Google Scholar
58 Beddoes, to Boulton, , 17 01 & 27 06 1799Google Scholar, Birmingham Public Libraries Box B2, 18, 21. Cartwright, F. F., The English pioneers of anaesthesia (Beddoes, Davy, and Hickman), Bristol, 1952.Google ScholarBeddoes, , Notice of some observations made at the Pneumatic Medical Institution, Bristol, 1799.Google Scholar
59 Anti-Jacobin Review and Magazine, 1800, 6, 111–18.Google Scholar
60 Ibid., 1800, 6, 424–28. For Rumford's philanthropy, see Berman, M., Social Change and Scientific Organization. The Royal Institution, 1799–1844, Ithaca, N.Y., 1978Google Scholar, chap. 1. Rumford's philanthropic concerns are evident in his writings, see e.g. his ‘Of Fundamental Principles on which General Establishments for the Relief of the Poor May Be Formed in All Countries’, & ‘Of Food: and Particularly of Feeding the Poor’, Collected Works of Count Rumford, ed. Brown, Sanford C., 5 vols., Cambridge, Mass., 1968–1970, v, 99–166 & 167–262.Google Scholar
61 Beddoes to Giddy, MS DG 41/16, CRO. Stern, , op. cit. (42)Google Scholar. See also the MS Assize of Bread, BRO. Latimer, J., Annals of Bristol in the 18th Century, Bristol, 1893, 516.Google Scholar See Thompson, , op. cit. (15)Google Scholar for a caution against the simplistic assumption that such attacks were simply reflex responses to shortages and high prices.
62 BRO, MS (n.d.) 1794, Box 10. Beddoes, , A guide for self preservation, and parental affection; or plain Directions for enabling people to keep themselves and their children Free from several Common Disorders, Bristol, 1794Google Scholar. Beddoes slightly underestimated infant mortality; for the best modern demographic estimates, see Wrigley, E. A. & Schofield, R., The Population History of England 1541–1871: A Reconstruction, Cambridge, Mass., 1982.Google Scholar There are useful essays in Glass, D. V. & Eversley, D. E., eds, Population in History. Essays in Historical Demography, London, 1965Google Scholar; a brief impressionistic account is given by Porter, Roy, English Society in the Eighteenth Century, Penguin Books, 1982.Google Scholar
63 Beddoes, , Observations on the nature and cure of calculus, sea scurvy, &c., 1792, 109.Google Scholar
64 The Golden Age, 5–7.Google Scholar
65 A specimen ribbon is enclosed in Beddoes, to Giddy, , 16 06 1795Google Scholar, MS DG 42/26.
66 A quarter of wheat was 8 bushels or 64 gallons; the fifth(!) part of a load (O.E.D.).
67 BRO 1794 Box 17, 4 July 1795. PRO MSS HO 43/6, 43/7.
68 PRO MS HO 42.35. BRO 1795 Box 42, 28 Sept. 1795. Again, see Thompson, , op. cit. (15)Google Scholar for a gloss on the relations between marketing practices and popular protest.
69 BRO 1795 Box 42, 16 Oct. 1795.
70 PRO MS HO 42/36. BRO 1794 Box 18, 11 Dec. 1795, 22 Dec. 1795, 28 Dec. 1795.
71 In fact, Pitt was closer to Adam Smith than to the traditional market economy—see Thompson, , op. cit. (15).Google Scholar
72 Beddoes, , Letter …, London, 1796, 4, 11, 13, 16, 18, 21, 27–8.Google Scholar
73 Beddoes, in The Watchman, 27 04 1796.Google Scholar
74 PRO MS HO 42.28. Copies of the royal proclamations issued in the 1790's were sent to Bristol, and may be consulted in many libraries, including PRO and BRO. Rose, R. B., op. cit. (3)Google Scholar. Stevenson, J., ‘Food riots in England, 1792–1818’, in Popular Protest and Public Order, ed. Quinalt, R. & Stevenson, J., London, 1974, 33–74.Google Scholar
75 Beddoes, to Wedgwood, [J.] [11 1801]Google Scholar, MS W/K.
76 Ibid., 21 July 1803 & 19 June 1807, MSS W/K. Beddoes, , op. cit. (27), iii, 86.Google Scholar
77 Berman, , op.cit. (60), chap. 1.Google Scholar
78 Cookson, , op. cit. (2).Google Scholar
79 Cartwright, , op. cit. (58)Google Scholar. Ellis, R. H., ed., Essays on the first Hundred Years of Anaesthesia, 3 vols., Edinburgh, 1982.Google ScholarSmith, W. D. A., Under the Influence. A History of Nitrous Oxide and Oxygen Anaesthesia, Basingstoke, 1982Google Scholar; Smith, E. B., ‘A Note on Humphry Davy's Experiments on the Respiration of Nitrous Oxide’Google Scholar, in Forgan, S., op. cit. (57), 231–8.Google Scholar
80 Beddoes, to ?, 27 11 1804Google Scholar, Birmingham Public Libraries, Boulton & Watt papers, M IV B.
81 Quoted in Treneer, A., The Mercurial Chemist. A Life of Sir Humphry Davy, London, 1963, 113.Google Scholar
82 Coleridge, , Watchman, 17 03 1796.Google Scholar
- 5
- Cited by