Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:54:37.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The ‘school of true, useful and universal science’? Freemasonry, natural philosophy and scientific culture in eighteenth-century England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2006

PAUL Elliott
Affiliation:
School of Geography, University of Nottingham, UK. Email: [email protected].
STEPHEN Daniels
Affiliation:
School of Geography, University of Nottingham, UK. Email: [email protected].

Abstract

Freemasonry was the most widespread form of secular association in eighteenth-century England, providing a model for other forms of urban sociability and a stimulus to music and the arts. Many members of the Royal Society and the Society of Antiquaries, for instance, were Freemasons, while historians such as Margaret Jacob have argued that Freemasonry was inspired by Whig Newtonianism and played an important role in European Enlightenment scientific education. This paper illustrates the importance of natural philosophy in Masonic rhetoric and utilizes material from Masonic histories, lodge records and secondary works to demonstrate that scientific lectures were indeed given in some lodges. It contends, however, that there were other sources of inspiration for Freemasonry besides Newtonianism, such as antiquarianism, and that many other factors as well as the prevalence of Masonic lodges determined the geography of English scientific culture. Although the subject of Freemasonry and natural philosophy has great potential, as Jacob has demonstrated so well, much further work, especially in the form of prosopographical studies of provincial lodges, is required before the nature of the relationship between the two can be fully appreciated.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2006 British Society for the History of Science

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Parts of the material were read at a seminar in the Library and Museum, Freemason's Hall, London in January 2004 by Paul Elliott, and I am grateful to Professor Andrew Prescott and members of the audience for their critical comments and suggestions.