Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:48:12.933Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

G. N. Lewis's Views on Bond Theory 1900–16

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Robert E. Kohler
Robert E. Kohler
Affiliation:
Department of History and Sociology of Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa. 19174, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a recent paper on the origin of G. N. Lewis's concept of the shared electron pair bond, I argued that the sources of Lewis's novel conception were certain ideas of J. J. Thomson and Alfred Parson. Yet the only influence that Lewis explicitly acknowledged was neither of these, but Alfred Werner's. The following statement appears in his book, Valence (1923):

I still have poignant remembrance of the distress which I and many others suffered some thirty years ago in a class in elementary chemistry, where we were obliged to memorize structural formulae of a great number of inorganic compounds. Even such substances as the ferricyanides and ferryocyanides were forced into the system, and bonds were drawn between the several atoms to comply with certain artificial rules, regardless of all chemical evidence. Such formulae are now believed to be almost, if not entirely devoid of scientific significance. Such abuse of the structural formula inevitably led to a reaction which found its best expression in the publications of Werner. His Neuere Anschauungen … (1905) marked a new epoch in chemistry; and in attempting to clarify the fundamental ideas of valence, there is no work to which I feel so much personal indebtedness as to this of Werner's.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal for the History of Science , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , November 1975 , pp. 233 - 239
Copyright
Copyright © British Society for the History of Science 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Kohler, Robert E., ‘The origins of G. N. Lewis's theory of the shared pair bond’, Historical studies in the physical sciences, iii (1971), 343–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Lewis, G. N., Valence and the structure of atoms and molecules (New York, 1923), pp. 67–8. (Reprinted, New York: Dover Publications, 1966.)Google Scholar
3 See Hildebrand, J. H., ‘G. N. Lewis’, Biographical memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences, xxxi (1958), 210–35.Google Scholar
4Werner, A., ‘Beitrag zur Konstitution anorganischer Verbindungen’, Zeitschrift für anorganishen Chemie, iii (1893), 267–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reprinted in Kaufmann, G. B., Classics in coordination chemistry (New York: Dover Publications, 1968).Google Scholar
On Werner, see Kaufmann, G. B., Alfred Werner (New York: Springer, 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Werner, A., ‘Beitrag zur Konstitution anorganischer Verbindungen III’, Zeitichrift für anorganishen Chemie, viii (1895), 153–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Werner, A., ‘Ueber Haupt-und Nebenvalenzen und Constititution der Ammoniumverbindungen’, Annalen der Chemie, cccxxiii (1902), 261–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Werner, A., Neure Anschauungen auf dem Gebiete der anorganischen Chemie (Braunschweig: Frederick Vieweg, 1905).Google Scholar
8Lewis, G. N. Archive, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley. It is a pleasure to thank Mrs Mary Lewis for making this and other documents available.Google Scholar
9Lewis, , op. cit. (2), pp. 60–1.Google Scholar
10Kaufmann, , Classics, op. cit. (4), p. 88.Google Scholar
11Lewis, G. N. Archive.Google Scholar
12Lewis, G. N., ‘A review of recent progress in physical chemistry’, Journal of the American Chemical Society, xxviii (1906), 893–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Kohler, , op. cit. (1).Google Scholar
14Werner, , op. cit. (7), pp. 32–3.Google Scholar
Abegg, R., ‘Die Valenz und das periodische System’, Zeitschrift für anorganischen Chemie, xxxix (1904), 330–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15 Catalogue, Division of Chemistry, Harvard University, 1902, pp. 21–2; 1903, pp. 22–3Google Scholar
16Kohler, , op. cit. (1).Google Scholar
17Lewis, G. N. Archive.Google Scholar
18Lewis, G. N., ‘Valence and tautomerism’, Journal of the American Chemical Society, xxxv (1913). 1448–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Lewis, G. N., pp. 1448–51.Google Scholar
20Lewis, G. N., p. 1453.Google Scholar
21Werner, A., New views in the field of inorganic chemistry (London: Longmans, Green, 1911), p. 68.Google Scholar
22Lewis, G. N., ‘The atom and the molecule’, Journal of the American Chemical Society, xxxviii (1969), 762–85.Google Scholar
23Lewis, G. N., pp. 777–8.Google Scholar
See also the discussion of this point in Kohler, R. E., ‘Irving Langmuir and the octet theory of valence’, Historical studies in the physical sciences, iv (1975), 39–87.Google Scholar
24Lewis, G. N. Emphasis added.Google Scholar