Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:50:14.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The 1984–85 miners' strike and technological change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Jonathan Winterton
Jonathan Winterton
Affiliation:
University of Bradford Management Centre, Emm Lane, Bradford BD9 4JL.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The proximate cause of the 1984–85 miners' strike, the longest mass strike in British history, was a round of colliery closures announced by the National Coal Board (NCB, now British Coal) in March 1984 as part of the restructuring of the British coal mining industry. The impact of pit closures upon communities is so immediate and devastating that the effect obscured the fundamental causes. The restructuring process had accelerated since 1979 because of the economic and energy policies adopted by Conservative governments, but had its origins in the Labour government's response to the 1973 oil shock and the tripartite settlement of the 1974 strike by the National Union of Mineworkers (NUM). The 1974 Plan for Coal established an investment programme to expand coal production by three means: developing new mines; extending the life of existing collieries; and implementing new technologies. These supply-side measures were already underway when the first Thatcher government, elected in 1979, established new limits on publicsector spending and sought to liberalize markets.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal for the History of Science , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , March 1993 , pp. 5 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © British Society for the History of Science 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 National Coal Board, Plan for Coal, London, 1974.Google Scholar

2 Monopolies and Mergers Commission, National Coal Board: A Report on the Efficiency and Costs in the Development, Production and Supply of Coal by the NCB, Cmnd. 8920, London, 1983.Google Scholar

3 Winterton, J. and Winterton, R., Coal, Crisis and Conflict: The 1984–85 Miners' Strike in Yorkshire, Manchester, 1989, 54–6, 144–51.Google Scholar

4 Burns, A., Newby, M. and Winterton, J., ‘The restructuring of the British coal industry’, Cambridge Journal of Economics (1985), 9(1), 93–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar [revised version in Debating Coal Closures (ed. Cooper, D. and Hopper, T.), Cambridge 1988, 253–77].Google Scholar

5 Burns, A., Feickert, D., Newby, M. and Winterton, J., ‘The miners and new technology’, Industrial Relations Journal (1983), 14(4), 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Burns, A., Feickert, D., Newby, M. and Winterton, J., An Interim Assessment of MINOS, Report No. 4, Working Environment Research Group, University of Bradford, 1982.Google Scholar

7 Mills, J., NCB Deputy Chairman at Colliery Officials and Staffs Association Annual Conference, 1983.Google Scholar

8 Burns, A., Newby, M. and Winterton, J., Second Report on MINOS, Report No. 6, Working Environment Research Group, University of Bradford, 1984.Google Scholar

9 Winterton, and Winterton, , op. cit. (3), 259–60.Google Scholar

10 Winterton, J. and Winterton, R., The Implications of NCB Restructuring Policies for West Yorkshire, West Yorkshire Metropolitan County Council Report, Wakefield, 1985Google Scholar (reissued June 1986 as Report No. 8, Working Environment Research Group, University of Bradford).

11 Winterton, J., The Effects of New Technologies on the Productivity and Production Costs of the British Coal Mining IndustryGoogle Scholar, Report No. 12, Working Environment Research Group, University of Bradford, 1988 (presented on behalf of the NUM to the House of Commons Committee on the Associated British Ports (No. 2) Bill and the North Killingholme Cargo Terminal Bill).

12 Winterton, and Winterton, , op. cit. (3), 47.Google Scholar

13 Winterton, and Winterton, , op. cit. (3), 9–12.Google Scholar

14 Trist, E. and Bamforth, K. W., ‘Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal getting’, Human Relations (1951), 4, 3–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Townshend, J., Innovation in Coal Mining Machinery: The Anderton Shearer Loader, Occasional Paper No. 3, Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, 1976.Google Scholar

15 Winterton, J., ‘Computerised coal: new technology in the mines’, Digging Deeper: Issues in the Miners’ Strike (ed. Beynon, H.), London, 1985, 231–43.Google Scholar

16 Newsnight, BBC TV, 16 02 1984.Google Scholar

17 Winterton, J., ‘Private power and public relations: the effects of privatisation upon industrial relations in British Coal’, New Forms of Ownership (ed. Jenkins, G. and Poole, M.), London, 1990, 134–50.Google Scholar

18 Winterton, J., ‘Flexibility, new technology and British Coal’ A Flexible Future? Prospects for Employment and Organization (ed. Blyton, P. and Morris, J.), Berlin, 1991, 275–94.Google Scholar

19 Leman, S. and Winterton, J., ‘New technology and the restructuring of pit-level industrial relations in the British coal industry’, New Technology, Work and Employment (1991), 6, 54–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20 Winterton, J., op. cit. (11).Google Scholar

21 Winterton, J., ‘Human factors and reliability in colliery maintenance’, International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management (1991), 8, 52–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

22 Tomaney, J. and Winterton, J., ‘The transformation of work? Technological change and the organisation of work practices in the British coal mining industry, XIIth World Congress of Sociology, Madrid, 1990.Google Scholar

23 Winrerton, J. and Winterton, R., Memorandum No. 60, House of Commons Select Committee on Energy, The Coal Industry, HC 165–1, London, 1980, 314–20.Google Scholar

24 Schumacher, E. F., ‘Coal – the next fifty years’, NUM Study Conference, Britain's Coal, London, 1960, 6–17.Google Scholar

25 Winterton, J. and Winterton, R., Strategic Implications of Proposed Colliery ClosuresGoogle Scholar, Report No. 1, Work Organisation Research Unit, University of Bradford, 1992 [evidence submitted to the House of Commons Trade and Industry Committee inquiry into British Energy Policy and the Market for Coal].