Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:14:36.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Catholic London District in the Eighteenth Century*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2015

Extract

The London of Challoner consisted only of some seven square miles, one square mile of which was, of course, the City of London. It can all be put onto some eight pages of the present A–Z map of London, which at the time of writing consists of 141 pages. John Rocques's map of London, on a scale of 200 feet to the inch, which he began in 1738 and finished in 1747, in its London Topographical Society format of 1982, perfectly illustrates the London of both Challoner and Defoe. The western extremities were at Marylebone, Knightsbridge and Chelsea, the eastern at Stepney, Limehouse and Deptford, the northern at Tottenham Court and Bethnal Green, while the southern limits were at Kennington and Walworth Common. The population of London was assessed by Wrigley in 1990 as c. 575,000 in 1700, as c. 675,000 in 1750 and as c. 959,000 in 1801. The 1767 papist returns indicated that most London Catholics lived in the parishes of St James and St Giles, within Westminster. Schwarz has pointed out the considerable social segregation in London, middle-class areas being in the west and central parts, with the poorer areas in the south and east. The St Giles area around Seven Dials going east to Bow Street and Drury Lane is reputed to have contained a third of the capital's beggars and to have been a notoriously criminal quarter. The Catholic numbers in Westminster were 7,724, the City numbers 1,492, with the Middlesex out-parishes having more than 2,000. The 1767 total for London, including the parishes to the south and east, comes to 12,320, clearly too low, as is the accumulated total for the London District of around 15,800. This gives about 3,500 for the London District outside the capital while Challoner's own figures give us a Catholic population of 5,261. If the errors in enumeration were the same in both areas (a large assumption), this enables us to guess that the 1767 figures could be corrected to about 18,500 London Catholics and about 24,000 for the whole District.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Catholic Record Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The author of this article died on 4 June 2005 and Mrs David Butler is thanked for agreeing to the posthumous publication.

References

Notes

1 Hyde, R. (ed.), The A to Z of Georgian London (London, 1982).Google Scholar

2 Wrigley, E., ‘Urban Growth and Agricultural Change: England and the Continent in the Early Modern Period’, in Borsay, P. (ed.), The Eighteenth Century Town (London, 1990), pp. 42–3.Google Scholar

3 Worrall, E., Returns of Papists 1767, Volume 2, Dioceses of England and Wales, except Chester, Catholic Record Society (London, 1989), pp. 130–41.Google Scholar

4 Schwarz, L., ‘Social Class and Social Geography: The Middle Classes in London at the End of the Eighteenth Century’, in Borsay, P. (ed.), The Eighteenth Century English Town (London, 1990), pp. 328–30.Google Scholar

5 Corfield, P., The Impact of English Towns (Oxford, 1982), pp. 78–9.Google Scholar

6 Rowlands, M. (ed.), Catholics of Parish and Town 1558–1778, p. 262.Google Scholar The number includes an assessment of c. 400 for the parts of the Lincoln diocese within the London District.

7 Butler, C., ‘Biographical Account of the Right Reverend Doctor Challoner, Bishop of Dehra, Vicar Apostolic over the English Catholics in the London District’, in Catholic Magazine (London, December 1831 and January 1832), p. 648.Google Scholar

8 Milner, J., Brief Account of the Life of the Late R. Rev. Richard Challoner, D.D., Bishop of Dehra and Apostolical Vicar of the Southern District (London, 1798), pp. 67.Google Scholar

9 Barnard, J., The Life of the Venerable and Right Reverend Richard Challoner, D.D., Bishop of Dehra, and V.A., collected from his writings, from authentick records, and from near twenty years'personal acquaintance with him (London, 1784), p. 37.Google Scholar

10 Milner, p. 6.

11 Berington, J., The State and Behaviour of English Catholics from the Reformation to the Year 1780 (London, 1780), p. viii.Google Scholar

12 Aveling, J., The Handle and the Axe (London, 1976), p. 279.Google Scholar

13 Hadland, T., Thames Valley Papists. From Reformation to Emancipation 1534–1829, pp. 115, 123.Google Scholar

14 Rowlands, p. 345.

15 Archive of the Archdiocese of Westminster (A.A.W.), Series A, XXXVIII. 2. See also Williams, J., ‘Thedistribution of Catholic chaplaincies in the early 18th century’, Recusant History, 12, No. 1, January 1973, pp. 42–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16 A.A.W., Series A, XL, p. 3.

17 A.A.W., Series A, XL, pp. 5–12.

18 Anstruther, G., The Seminary Priests, III & IV (Great Wakering, 1976 and 1977).Google Scholar Bellenger, A., English and Welsh Priests 1558–1800 (Bath, 1984).

19 A.A.W., Series A, XL, p. 57. Letter of 1746 of Mayes to Propaganda.

20 Whyte, J., ‘The Vicars Apostolics’ Returns of 1773’, Recusant History, 9, No. 4, January 1968, pp. 205214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

21 Archive of the Archdiocese of Southwark (A.A.S.), 37, Stonor's Roman Agency, p. 544.

22 A.A. W., Series A, XLI. 132 has Talbot's numbers for the London District areas in 1773. Challoner has added his own numbers in the margins and seems to have greater knowledge than Talbot of the actual situations.

23 A.A.W., Series A, XLII. 56 contains a request to Talbot for the figures from Kit Stonor in Rome in September 1784.

24 Bossy, J., The English Catholic Community 1570–1850 (London, 1975) pp. 182 Google Scholar et seq. Duffy, E. (ed.), Challoner and His Church (London, 1981), pp. 7 Google Scholar et seq.

25 A.A.W., Z 71, pp. 138–9.

26 Foley, B., Some People of the Penal Times (Lancaster, 1991), pp. 105 Google Scholar et seq.

27 Gwynn, D., Bishop Challoner (London, 1946), pp. 97–8, 161–2.Google Scholar

28 A.A.W., Z 72.

29 A.A.S., 37, Stonor's Roman Agency, pp. 429–476.

30 Burton, E., The Life and Times of Bishop Challoner 1691–1781 (London, 1909), I, p. 141.Google Scholar

31 Barnewall, Mrs., A Hundred Years Ago (London, 1877), pp. 5363.Google Scholar

32 Gandy, M., Catholic Missions and Registers 1700–1880, Volume 1. London and the Home Counties (London, 1993), p. 41.Google Scholar

33 Harting, J., Catholic London Missions (London, 1903), p. 82.Google Scholar

34 A.A.W., Paris Seminary Collection, p. 807.

35 Dougherty, C., ‘The Assignment of Priests in the London District, 1814’, London Recusant, III, 1, January 1973, p. 14.Google Scholar

36 Harting, p. 210.

37 Gwynn, D., Bishop Challoner (London, 1946), pp. 6970.Google Scholar

38 Duffy, ‘Poor Protestant Flies’, in Baker, D. (ed.), Studies in Church History XV (Oxford, 1978), p. 302.Google Scholar

39 Rowlands, p. 269. Crichton, J., Worship in a Hidden Church (Dublin, 1988), pp. 73, 80.Google Scholar

40 Pollen, J. (ed.), Challoner, R., Memoirs of Missionary Priests (London, 1924), pp. 135–6.Google Scholar

41 His name was actually George Frankland, or Whitaker, who by 1741 had become the priest at Pennington and Avon in Hampshire and was recorded in Challoner's visitation notes. Anstruther, IV, p. 297.

42 Holt, G., ‘The Embassy Chapels in London’, The London Recusant, II, No. 1, January 1972, pp. 1937.Google Scholar Most of the information on the embassy chapels is derived from this source.

43 A.A.S., 37, Stonor Agency Papers, pp. 31–2.

44 Reynolds, E., The Mawhood Diaries, Catholic Record Society, Volume 50 (London, 1956).Google Scholar

45 Blom, F., Blom, J., Korsten, F., Scott, G. English Catholic Books, 1701–1800 (Aldershot, 1996), pp. xxi.Google Scholar

46 A.A.W. Challoner Materials 112 and Ushaw MSS II, 125.

47 A.A.W. Series A, XL, pp. 82–3.

48 Foley, B., ‘Peter James Coghlan’ in Some People of the Penal Times (Lancaster, 1991), pp. 13 Google Scholar et seq.

49 Williams, B., The Whig Supremacy 1714–1760 (Oxford, 1952), p. xx.Google Scholar Barraclough, G. (ed.) The Times Concise Atlas of World History, p. 98.Google Scholar

50 Defoe, D.; Rogers, P. (ed.) A Tour through the Whole Island of Great Britain (Harmondsworth, 1986), pp. 135, 147, 191.Google Scholar

51 PRO, FEC, 1/1084.

52 Haydon, C., Anti-Catholicism in Eighteenth Century England (Manchester, 1992), pp. 112–3.Google Scholar

53 Aveling, J., The Handle and the Axe (London, 1976), p. 263.Google Scholar

54 A.A.W., D25, 1R–6R.

55 A.A.W., Series A, XL, p. 112. Burton, I, pp. 373–4.

56 Defoe, p. 690, notes. These are almost certainly wrong with regard to Hales. As a known Catholic, he is unlikely to have sat in Parliament. Kirk, J., Biographies of English Catholics (London, 1909),Google Scholar gives his name as Sir John Hales and his date of death as 1744, not 1748.

57 Ibidem., p. 144.

58 Ibidem., p. 147.

59 Ibidem., p. 347.

60 A.A.W., Series A, XL, pp. 31 et seq. These fragments have been typed out by Canon Burton.

61 Foley, B., Some People of the Penal Times (Lancaster, 1991), pp. 107–8.Google Scholar