Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 September 2015
Literary writings had a significant, if elusive and subtle, rôle to play in securing the position of the English Catholic community in the especially vulnerable period 1829–1850. It is questionable that the Catholic press and Catholic apologists and polemicists played so large a part in calming the anti-Catholic frenzy so evident in the 1820s as the subsequent more literary products of Catholics and those non-Catholics who were intrigued by Catholicism. Holmes remarks that in this period ‘most Catholic apologists attempted the fruitless and unending task of answering specific objections and those books or pamphlets which survive are merely gathering dust on the shelves of Catholic libraries’. It took greater art to get behind the defences of John Bull's anti-Catholic fortress mentality. The rôle of literature was to affect the perceptions and sympathies of the intelligentsia rather than political conditions: at the beginning of this period people felt with Dr. Arnold that ‘the [Anglican] Church, as it now stands, no human power can save'; while at its end, people could hold the expectation ‘that Popery will in a few years become the popular religion of these realms’. This sense of the seriousness of the Catholic presence was established mostly, of course, by Catholicism's actual presence; but that was amplified and consolidated in the mind of the educated public by literature, substantially in a positive direction.
1 Derek Holmes, J., More Roman than Rome (Burns & Oates, 1978) pp. 45–6.Google Scholar
2 Respectively: letter of 10 June 1832 in Stanley, A. P., The Life and Correspondence of Thomas Arnold, D. D. 6th ed. (B. Fellowes, 1846) p. 253;Google Scholar Kingsley, Charles, ‘Why should we fear the Romish priests?’ Eraser's Magazine XXXVII (Jan.—June 1848) p. 467.Google Scholar
3 See Bostrom, Irene, ‘The Novel and Catholic Emancipation’ Studies in Romanticism, II (1962–3) pp. 155–76.Google Scholar
4 Poems by John Nicholson 2nd ed. (Bingley, 1876), pp. 164–5.Google Scholar
5 Newman, Lectures on the Present Position of Catholics in England, 5th ed. (????????Bums, Oates, n.d.) pp. 11–12, 71, 88.Google Scholar
6 Acton, Essays on Church and State ed. Woodruff, Douglas (Hollis & Carter, 1952) p. 263.Google Scholar
7 Eg. see Grierson, Herbert, The Background of English Literature. Classical and Romantic (1962) pp. 276, 277;Google Scholar Heath-Stubbs, John, The Darkling Plain (Eyre & Spottiswoode, 1950) pp. 123–4.Google Scholar For a more considered look as the relationship between Romanticism and Catholicism see Fairchild, H. N., ‘Romanticism and the Religious Revival in England’ Journal of the History of ideas, II, (1941) pp. 330–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Morris, Kevin, The Image of the Middle Ages in Romantic and Victorian Literature (Croom Helm, 1984) pp. 17ff.;Google Scholar 137–8; 221 ff.
8 Morris, The Image of the Middle Ages in Romantic and Victorian Literature, pp. 133–4.
9 He said as much in his article ‘The State of Religious Parties’ (1839), which point he repeated in the Apologia Pro Vita Sua: article reprinted in Essays Critical and Historical, vol. I.
10 2 vols. (1829), II, pp. 7–8; I, p. 4.
11 Mill, The Spirit of the Age in Mill's Essays on Literature and Society ed. Schneewind, J. B. (New York, 1965) p. 30.Google Scholar
12 Thomas Carlyle in review of Taylor's, W., Historic Survey of German Poetry, Edinburgh Review, LIII (1831),Google Scholar in Critical and Miscellaneous Essays, 6 vols. (Chapman & Hall, 1869), III, p. 324.Google Scholar
13 Disraeli, The Young Duke, new ed. (Longmans, Green, n.d.), bk. II, ch. iv, pp. 62–3.Google Scholar
14 See Clausson, Nils, ‘English Catholics and Roman Catholicism in Disraeli's Novels’, in Nineteenth-Century Fiction vol. 33 (Mar. 1979) pp. 454–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar For a contemporary Catholic view see Finlason, W. F., ‘The Hebraisms and Catholicisms of Disraeli's Novels’ in The Rambler, n.s. vol. 1 (1854), pp. 439–53.Google Scholar
15 Gladstone, Church Principles considered in their Results (John Murray, 1840), pp. 13; 324–5.Google Scholar
16 Heath-Stubbs, The Darkling Plain, p. 146.
17 Reprinted in Lord Macaulay's Essays, (Longmans, Green, 1897).
18 (Rivington, 1842), pp. 350, 353, 608, 598.
19 ‘Recent Developments of Puseyism’, Edinburgh Review, LXXX (Oct. 1844), pp. 314–70. He is referring to the Tractarian Lives of the English Saints series (1843–4). For background see Derek Holmes, J., ‘Newman's Reputation and The Lives of the English Saints ’ in Catholic Historical Review, LI, (Jan. 1966), pp. 528–38.Google Scholar
20 Dalton Barham, R. H., The Life and Letters of the Rev. Richard Harris Barham, 2 vols., (Richard Bentley, 1870), II, p. 8.Google Scholar
21 (1843), p. vii.
22 De Lisle to Montalembert, 19 Nov. 1851, Dublin Review no. 463 (1954), p. 325.
23 Ibidem, p. 58.
24 Newman, Apologia Pro Vita Sua, ed. Svaglic, Martin J. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1967) p. 190.Google Scholar
25 The Rambler, n.s., vol. I (1859), p. 79.
26 Kingsley, Literary and General Lectures and Essays, (Macmillan, 1890), p. 307.Google Scholar
27 Dublin Review, XVII (Sept. 1844), p. 163.
28 The Rambler, n.s., I (1859), p. 79.
29 See Whibley, Charles, Lord John Manners and His Friends, 2 vols. (1925), p. 254.Google Scholar
30 (1890), pp. 101–106.
31 See Shea, Donald F., The English Ranke: John Lingard (Humanities Press, New York, 1969) p. 28,Google Scholar and Records and Recollections of St. Cuthbert's College, Ushaw by ‘An Old Alumnus’, (Preston, 1889), p. 79.
32 Essays on Church and State, pp. 262–3.
33 Mozley, Reminiscences Chiefly of Oriel College and the Oxford Movement, 2 vols., (Longmans, Green, 1882), II, p. 309.Google Scholar For Digby's influence see Morris, Kevin, ‘The Cambridge Converts and the Oxford Movement’ Recusant History, XVII (Oct. 1985), pp. 386–9,Google Scholar and Morris ‘Kenelm Henry Digby and English Catholicism’ Recusant History, XX (May 1991), pp. 363; 367–8.Google Scholar
34 Hare, J. C., Hare, A. W. Guesses at Truth, 1st ser. 3rd ed. (1847), pp. 230–7.Google Scholar
35 Leslie, Studies in Sublime Failure (Ernest Benn, 1932), p. 25.Google Scholar
36 An Apology, in Pugin The True Principles and Revival of Christian Architecture (1853), pp. 50–51.Google Scholar
37 Pugin, ‘Ecclesiastical Architecture in England’ Dublin Review XII (Feb. 1842), pp. 182–3.Google Scholar
38 Wiseman, ‘Pugin on Modern and Ancient’ Dublin Review III (Oct. 1837). p. 360.Google Scholar
39 Op. cit., The Library Edition, The Complete Works of John Ruskin ed. E. T. Cook and Alexander Wedderburn, 39 vols. (1903–1912) IX, p. 436.
40 ‘The Poetry of Sacred and Legendary Art’, in Kingsley Literary and General Lectures and Essays, pp. 188ff.
41 Capes, J. M., ‘Savonarola: Catholicism in the Fifteenth and in the Nineteenth Century’, Rambler XII (1853), pp. 342, 344;Google Scholar and see p. 343.
42 See Pugin, cited in Ferrey, Benjamin Recollections of A. N. Welby Pugin (1861), pp. 434–5; 438–9.Google Scholar
43 For questioning of Catholic press, see Catholic Miscellany, n.s., (Apr. 1829) p. 193, Rambler XII, (Aug. 1853), p. 84.
44 Capes, J. M., ‘The Struggles of Catholic Literature’, Rambler IX (1852), pp. 255–7.Google Scholar Cf. ‘Catholic Literature in the English Tongue’ in Newman, The Idea of a University.
45 Stothert, J. A., ‘Catholic Novelists’ Rambler XI (1853), pp. 251–62.Google Scholar
46 Acton, ‘The Catholic Press’, Rambler XI (1859), pp. 73ff.
47 In his sermon, “The Second Spring’, 1852.
48 Harris, Rest in the Church (Longman, Brown, Green, 1848), pp. 1; 2–3.Google ScholarPubMed
49 Lectures on the Present Position of Catholics in England, p. 373.