Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:23:25.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Risk Management in a Fair Valuation World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2011

M. H. D. Kemp
Affiliation:
Threadneedle Asset Management Limited, 60 St Mary Axe, London EC3A 8JQ, U.K.

Abstract

This paper considers the impact that the current trend towards fair valuation of assets and liabilities is likely to have on risk measurement and management practices within the financial services industry. The paper analyses the different sorts of risks faced by organisations such as asset managers, pension funds, banks and insurers, and seeks to identify how their approach to the measurement and management of these sorts of risks might change as fair valuation becomes more entrenched. It argues that what it describes as traditional ‘time series’ based risk measurement is likely to be progressively displaced over time by a greater emphasis on what the paper refers to as ‘derivative pricing’ (or ‘fair value’ or ‘market consistent’) based risk modelling. It comments on the trend towards liability driven investment. The paper focuses on ‘financial’ risks (market, credit, liquidity and, more generally, asset/liability risk) rather than ‘operational’ risks, whilst noting that the dividing line between the two can be open to interpretation. Insurance risk is seen as in some respects straddling both camps.

Type
Sessional meetings: papers and abstracts of discussions
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abarbanel, H.D.I. (1993). The analysis of observed chaotic data in physical systems. Reviews of Modern Physics, 65, 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I.A. (1970). Handbook of mathematical functions. Dover Publications Inc.Google Scholar
Billah, M.B., Hyndman, R.J. & Koehler, A.B. (2003). Empirical information criteria for time series forecasting model selection. Monash University, Australia, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics, working paper 2/2003, ISSN 1440–771X.Google Scholar
Black, F. & Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, P.M. & Marcato, G. (2004). The measurement and modelling of commercial real estate performance. British Actuarial Journal, 10, 561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, R.J., Gordon, T.J. & Speed, C.A. (2001). Pensions, funding and risk. British Actuarial Journal, 7, 605662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, P.K., Hinton, P.H., Nicholson, E.J., Storey, L., Wells, G.G. & White, M.G. (2003). The implication for fair value accounting for general insurance companies. British Actuarial Journal, 8, 10071044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowling, C.A., Gordon, T.J. & Speed, C.A. (2004). Funding defined benefit pension schemes. British Actuarial Journal, 11, 63131 and 497-518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Financial News (2004). New focus on risk and return brings derivatives boom. Financial News Briefing Notes, March 2004.Google Scholar
GN45 (2004). Actuarial Guidance Note GN45: Determining the with-profits insurance capital component (version 1.1). Faculty and Institute of Actuaries, 31 December 2004.Google Scholar
Heywood, G.C., Marsland, J.R. & Morrison, G.M. (2003). Practical risk management for equity portfolio managers. British Actuarial Journal, 8, 10611123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, M. (2004). Fair value's big time implications. Investment & Pensions Europe Netherlands Supplement, May 2004.Google Scholar
Investment Management Association (2004). Market timing: guidelines for managers of investment funds. Paper published by the Investment Management Association, October 2004, see www.investmentuk.orgGoogle Scholar
IMA & Data (2004). Pricing guidance for investment funds: fair value pricing. Paper published by the Investment Management Association and the Depositary and Trustee Association, September 2004, see www.investmentuk.orgGoogle Scholar
Kemp, M.H.D. (1997). Actuaries and derivatives. British Actuarial Journal, 3, 51162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, M.H.D., Cumberworth, M., Gardner, D., Johnson, J. & Sandford, C. (2000). Portfolio risk measurement and reporting: an overview for pension funds. Institute of Actuaries.Google Scholar
Leippold, M. (2004). ‘Do not rely on VaR’. Euromoney, November 2004.Google Scholar
LIFFE (1992a). The reporting and performance measurement of financial futures and options in investment portfolios. The London International Financial Futures and Options Exchange.Google Scholar
LIFFE (1992b). Futures and options: standards for measuring their impact on investment portfolios. The London International Financial Futures and Options Exchange.Google Scholar
Merton, R.C. (1974). On the pricing of corporate debt: the risk structure of interest rates. Journal of Finance, 29, 449470.Google Scholar
Neuberger, A.J. (1990). Option pricing: a non-stochastic approach. London Business School Institute of Finance and Accounting, IFA working paper 183.Google Scholar
Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T. & Flannery, B.P. (1992). Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing (2nd edition). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schönbucher, P.J. (2003). Credit derivatives pricing models. Wiley Finance.Google Scholar
Sheldon, T.J. & Smith, A.D. (2004). Market consistent valuation of life assurance business. British Actuarial Journal, 10, 543626.Google Scholar
Weigend, A.S. & Gershenfeld, N.A. (1993). Time series prediction: forecasting the future and understanding the past, SFI Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, Proc Vol. XV, Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Yiasoumi, C., Canham, D., Miller, J., Wharmby, N. (2004). The management of the discontinuance of large defined benefit schemes. Paper presented to the Staple Inn Actuarial Society, 16 November 2004.Google Scholar