Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T21:44:22.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Insurance accounting: a new era? ‐ Abstract of the London discussion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2013

Kamran Foroughi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This abstract relates to the following paper:

ForoughiK., BarnardC. R., BennettR.W., ClayD. K., ConwayE.L., CorfieldS.R., CoughlanA.J., HarrisonJ.S., HibbettG.J., KendixI.V., Lanari-BoisclairM., O’ BrienC.D. and StrakerJ.S.K.Insurance accounting: a new era? ‐ Abstract of the London discussionBritish Actuarial Journal, doi:10.1017/S1357321712000189

Type
Sessional meetings: papers and abstracts of discussions
Information
British Actuarial Journal , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , September 2012 , pp. 616 - 644
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Horton, J. & Macve, R. (1994). The Development of Life Assurance Accounting and Regulation in the UK: Reflections on Recent Proposals for Accounting Change. Accounting, Business and Financial History, Vol 4, No.2: 295–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Forfar, D.O. & Masters, N.B. (1999). Developing an International Accounting Standard for Life Insurance Business, presented to the Faculty of Actuaries, Edinburgh, 15 March 1999. British Actuarial Journal, Vol 5, Part IV: pp. 621–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 The discussions around the amendments needed to the ASB's SORP that followed the 1994 EU Insurance Accounts Directive, the two-volume Issues Paper issued by IASC in 1999, and the lengthy Draft Statement of Principles (DSOP) taken over from IASC and issued by IASB during 2001.The DSOP was never adopted by the Board and is now no longer available on its website.

4 Horton, J., Macve, R., & Serafeim, G. (2007). An Experiment in ‘Fair Value’ Accounting? The State of the Art in Research and Thought Leadership on Accounting for Life Assurance in the UK and Continental Europe (London: Centre for Business Performance, ICAEW)Google Scholar

5 Bromwich, M., Macve, R. & Sunder, S. (2010). ‘Hicksian income in the conceptual framework’. Abacus, Vol. 46, No. 3: 348–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Horton, J. & Macve, R. (1996). The “Amortized Cost” Basis for Fixed-Interest Investments: A Note on Economic, Actuarial and Accounting Concepts of Value and Income, in I. Lapsley (ed.) Essays in Accounting Thought: A Tribute to W.T. Baxter (Edinburgh: ICAS), pp.127–155.Google Scholar

7 Serafeim, G. (2011. Consequences and Institutional Determinants of Unregulated Corporate Financial Statements: Evidence from Embedded Value Reporting. Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 49 (2) (May), pp. 529–571CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

8 Horton, J., Macve, R. 7 Serafeim, G. (2011). “Deprival value” vs “Fair Value” measurement for contract liabilities in resolving the revenue recognition conundrum: towards a general solution. Accounting & Business Research (forthcoming)Google Scholar

9 Macve, R. (2010). The case for deprival value. In ‘Wanted: foundations of accounting measurement’, EAA Symposium, Tampere 2009. Abacus, 46(1): 111–119Google Scholar

10 Goford, J. (1985). ‘The Control Cycle: Financial Control of a Life Assurance Company’, Journal of the Institute of Actuaries’ Students Society, 28: 99–114Google Scholar

11 Horton, J., Macve, R. & Serafeim, G. (2011). “Deprival value” vs “Fair Value” measurement for contract liabilities in resolving the revenue recognition conundrum: towards a general solution. Accounting & Business Research (forthcoming)Google Scholar