Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:39:16.134Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Actuarial Theory of Option Pricing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2011

R.S. Clarkson
R.S. Clarkson
Affiliation:
Cherrybank, Manse Brae, Dalserf, Larkhall, Lanarkshire, ML9 3BN, U.K. Tel: +44 (0)1698 882451
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using an empirical approach to capital market returns analogous to that used for mortality rates by Halley more than three centuries ago to establish life assurance on a sound and scientific footing, a theory of option pricing is built up in terms of the same three key components as for life assurance premiums, namely the expected cost of claims, an allowance for expenses, and a contingency margin as a reserve against the risk of insolvency. The dimensionality of the process describing security returns to any future point in time is increased from two to three by the addition of systematic variability around ‘central values’ to the standard descriptors of expected return and variance of return. It is shown that this approach, which involves only common sense principles and elementary mathematics, has important theoretical, practical and regulatory advantages over the Black-Scholes and related methodologies of modern finance theory.

Keywords

Option PricingBlack-Scholes FormulaCox, RossRubinsteinDiffusion ProcessesDynamic Equilibrium ModelStochastic CalculusEquilibriumEfficient Market HypothesisRiskUncertaintyCentral Values
Type
Sessional meetings: papers and abstracts of discussions
Information
British Actuarial Journal , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , 01 June 1997 , pp. 321 - 409
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allais, M. (1953). Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axiomes de l'école Americaine. Econometrica, 21, 503–546.Google Scholar
Allais, M. (1954). L'outil mathématique en economique. Econometrica, 22, 58–71.Google Scholar
Allais, M. (1989). An outline of my main contributions to economicscience. Nobel Lecture, December 9, 1988. Les Prix Nobel, Norstedts Tryckeri, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Bachelier, L. (1900). Théorie de la spéculation. Annales de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure, 3. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
Bartels, H. (1995). The hypotheses underlying the pricing of options. Transactions of the 5th AFIR International Colloquium, Brussels, 1, 3–15.Google Scholar
Bergman, Y.Z. (1982). Pricing of contingent claims in perfect andimperfect markets. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Bernoulli, D. (1738). Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis. Commentarli Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanea, 5, 175–192. English translation in Econometrica, 22 (1954), 23–36.Google Scholar
Bernstein, P.L. (1992). Capital ideas: the improbable origins of modern Wall Street. The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Black, F. & Scholes, M. (1972). The valuation of option contracts and a test of market efficiency. Journal of Finance, 27, 399–417.Google Scholar
Black, F. & Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637–654.Google Scholar
Bouchaud, J. & Sornette, D. (1994). The Black-Scholes option pricing problem in mathematical finance: generalization and extension for a large class of stochastic processes. Journal of Physics (France), 4, 863–881.Google Scholar
Bouchaud, J, Iori, D. & Sornette, D. (1996). Real-world options. Risk, March 1996, 61–65.Google Scholar
Bouchaud, J. & Sornette, D. (1996). Derivatives trading: physicists favour less complex and risky theory. Physics Today, March 1996, 15.Google Scholar
Bowie, D.C. & Clarkson, R.S. (1996). An exploratory analysis of the structure of the FT-SE 100 Index. Transactions of the 6th AFIR International Colloquium, Nuremberg, 2, 1601–1629.Google Scholar
Clarkson, R.S. (1978). A mathematical model for the gilt-edged market. T.F.A. 36, 85–160 and J.I.A. 106, 85–148.Google Scholar
Clarkson, R.S. (1981). A market equilibrium model for the management of ordinary share portfolios. T.F.A. 37, 439–607 and J.I.A. 110, 17–134.Google Scholar
Clarkson, R.S. (1989). The measurement of investment risk. T.F.A. 41, 677–750 and J.I.A. 116, 127–178.Google Scholar
Clarkson, R.S. (1990). The assessment of financial risk. Transactions of the 1st AFIR International Colloquium, Paris, 2, 171–194.Google Scholar
Clarkson, R.S. (1995a). Some observations on the Black-Scholes option pricing formula. Transactions of the 5th AFIR International Colloquium, Brussels, 3, 1125–1136.Google Scholar
Clarkson, R.S. (1995b). Asset/liability modelling and the downside approach to risk. Transactions of the 25th International Congress of Actuaries, Brussels, 3, 139–163.Google Scholar
Clarkson, R.S. (1996a). Financial economics — an investment actuary's viewpoint. B.A.J. 2, 809–973.Google Scholar
Clarkson, R.S. (1996b). A dynamic equilibrium model for capital market behaviour. Transactions of the 6th AFIR International Colloquium, Nuremberg, 1, 285–302.Google Scholar
Clarkson, R.S. & Plymen, J. (1988). Improving the performance of equity portfolios. J.I.A. 115, 631–691 and T.F.A. 41, 631–675.Google Scholar
Cox, J.C., Ross, S.A. & Rubinstein, M. (1979). Option pricing: a simplified approach. Journal of Financial Economics, 7, 229–263.Google Scholar
Day, N., Green, S.J. & Plymen, J. (1994). Investment — assessing a manager's skill and monitoring the risks. J.I.A. 121, 69–117, and T.F.A. 44, 318–372.Google Scholar
Dunlop, A.I. (editor) (1992). The Scottish ministers' widows'fund, 1743–1993. Saint Andrew Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. (1920). Relativity. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Fama, E.F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25, 383–417.Google Scholar
Föllmer, H. (1991). Probabilistic aspects of options, Mitteilungsblatt des Fördervereins für Mathematische Statistik und Versicherungsmathematik, Göttingen University.Google Scholar
Geman, H. & Ané, T. (1996). Stochastic subordination. Risk, September 1996, 145–149.Google Scholar
Halley, E. (1693). An estimate of the degrees of mortality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 17, 596–610.Google Scholar
Haycocks, H.W. & Plymen, J. (1956). Investment policy and index numbers. T.F.A. 23, 379–427.Google Scholar
Haycocks, H.W. & Plymen, J. (1964). The design, application and future development of the FT-Actuaries index. T.F.A. 28, 377–422.Google Scholar
Hayek, F.A. (1975). The pretence of knowledge. Nobel Memorial Lecture, December 11, 1974. Les Prix Nobel, P.A. Norstedts, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Jamieson, A.T. (1959). Some problems of life office investment in ordinary shares. T.F.A. 26, 317–367.Google Scholar
Jensen, M.C. (1968). The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945–64. Journal of Finance 23, 389–416.Google Scholar
Jousseaume, J. (1994). Paradoxes sur le calcul des options — extensions des modèles. Transactions of the 4th AFIR International Colloquium, Orlando, 2, 691–716.Google Scholar
Jousseaume, J. (1995). Paradoxes sur le calcul des options — et si ce n'était qu'une illusion. Transactions of the 5th AFIR International Colloquium, Brussels, 1, 133–158.Google Scholar
Jousseaume, J. (1996). Paradoxes regarding the calculation of options: the keys to the enigma? Transactions of the 6th AFIR International Colloquium, Nuremberg, 2, 1267–1298.Google Scholar
Keynes, J.M. (1921). A treatise on probability. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Keynes, J.M. (1936). The general theory of employment, Interest and money. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T.S. (1977). The essential tension: selected studies in scientific tradition and change. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lamberton, D. & Lapeyre, B. (1996). Introduction to stochastic calculus applied to finance Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
Mandelbrot, B.B. (1963). The variation of certain speculative prices. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1, 121–154.Google Scholar
Markowitz, H.M. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7, 77–91.Google Scholar
Markowitz, H.M. (1959). Portfolio selection. Second edition (1991), Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Markowitz, H.M., Todd, P., Xu, G. & Yamane, Y. (1993). Computation of mean-semivariance efficient sets by the critical line algorithm. Annals of Operation Research, 44, 307–318.Google Scholar
Mills, T.C. (1991). Equity prices, dividends and gilt yields in the U.K.: cointegration, error correction and ‘confidence’. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 38, 242–255.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W.C. (1915). The making and using of index numbers. Introduction to index numbers and wholesale prices in the United States and foreign countries. Bulletin No. 173 of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.Google Scholar
Neill, A. (1977). Life contingencies. Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
Von Neumann, J.R. & Morgenstern, O., (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nisbet, M. (1990). Transaction costs on the London traded options market and a test of market efficiency based on put-call parity theory. Transactions of the 1st AFIR International Colloquium, Paris, 2, 99–121.Google Scholar
O'shaughnessy, J.P. (1996). What works on Wall Street, McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead.Google Scholar
Pepper, G.T. (1964). The selection and maintenance of a gilt-edgedportfolio. J.I.A. 90, 63–103.Google Scholar
Peters, E.E. (1991). Chaos and order in the capital markets. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Plymen, J. & Prevett, R.M. (1972). The computer for investment research. T.F.A. 33, 143–186.Google Scholar
Rudd, A. & Clasing, H.K. (1982). Modern portfolio theory: he principles of investment management. Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood, Illinois.Google Scholar
Savage, L.J. (1954). Foundations of statistics. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Shiller, R.J. (1989). Market volatility. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Slater, J.D. (1996). Pegging your fortunes to a formula. Investors Chronicle, 2 February 1996, 20.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1776). An enquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Volume II of the Glasgow edition of the works and correspondence of Adam Smith (1978), Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1795). Essays on philosophical subjects. Volume III of the Glasgow edition of the works and correspondence of Adam Smith (1978), Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Soros, G. (1994). Evidence to the U.S. House Banking Committee, April 1994.Google Scholar
Tables for Actuarial Examinations (1980). The Faculty and Institute of Actuaries.Google Scholar
Walter, C., (1995). Lévy-stability-under-addition and fractal structure of markets. Transactions of the 5th AFIR International Colloquium, Brussels, 3b, 159–203.Google Scholar
Weaver, D. & Hall, M.G. (1967). The evaluation of ordinary shares using a computer. J.I.A. 93, 165–227.Google Scholar
Weinberg, S. (1993). Dreams of a final theory. Vintage, London.Google Scholar