Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:25:53.734Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ulpius Marcellus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2011

M. Brassington
M. Brassington
Affiliation:
34, Chestnut Avenue, Mickleover, Derby
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes
Information
Britannia , Volume 11 , November 1980 , pp. 314 - 315
Copyright
Copyright © Mr M. Brassington 1980. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* I am most grateful to Paul Halstead, Mark Hassall and Joyce Reynolds for their comments on the first draft of this note.

10 RIB 905, 928, 1202, 1235, 1278, 1705 (securely dated to 213), RIB 1018 (dated 212–217). RIB 976 also belongs to this group, as do possibly 1551 and 1741. For further comment and references see Birley, A. R., Epigraphische Studien 4, p. 87, no. 45Google Scholar: C. Julius Marcus.

11 The name of the dedicator does not survive in every case. However, RIB 905, 976, 1202, 1235 and 1705 are all erected by auxiliary units and the uniformity of the stones (along with their provenances) makes it virtually certain that the remainder should be seen in a military context.

12 See Jarrett, Michael G., ‘The case of the redundant official’, Britannia ix (1978), 289–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar