Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:54:21.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Excavations at 10 Old Market Street, Usk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2011

D.R. Evans  and
V.M. Metcalf
D.R. Evans
Affiliation:
Glamorgan Gwent Archaeological Trust, 6, Prospect Place, Swansea
V.M. Metcalf
Affiliation:
Glamorgan Gwent Archaeological Trust, 6, Prospect Place, Swansea
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Modern Usk is a small market town situated within the county of Gwent on the east bank of the River Usk at its confluence with the tributary River Olway, and on the flood plain of both rivers. It lies at a height of c. 17 m O D, on a major bridging-point of the River Usk, and commands two natural routeways. The first, formed by the valley of the Usk itself, runs from the central highlands of southern Wales around Brecon, south-eastwards to Abergavenny and Usk, and from there southwards to reach the sea at Newport. The second, minor, route follows the valley of the Olway north-east to Raglan.

Type
Articles
Information
Britannia , Volume 20 , November 1989 , pp. 23 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © D.R. Evans and V.M. Metcalf 1989. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 Boon, G.C., Monmouthshire Antiq. i pt. 2 (1962).Google Scholar

3 Healey, E.M., Arch. Wales xxviii (1988), 42.Google Scholar

4 D.R. Evans and V.M. Metcalf, The ‘Roman Gates’ Site in the Fortress of the Second Augustan Legion at Caerleon Gwent: The Excavations of the Roman Buildings and Evidence for Early Medieval Activity (forthcoming).

5 Manning, W.H., Report on the Excavations at Usk 1965–76; The Fortress Excavation 1968–71 (Cardiff, 1981), 140–146.Google Scholar

6 A.G. Marvell et al., Excavations at the Roman Auxiliary Fort, at Loughor, West Glamorgan (forthcoming).

7 Manning, W.H., Saalburg-Jb. xxxii (1975), 105–29Google Scholar ; W.H. Manning, op. cit. (note 5), 173–83; A.G. Marvell, et al., op. cit. (note 6).

8 W.H. Manning, op. cit. (note 5), 114, 115, 121.

9 ibid., 31–34.

10 Pitts, L.F. and St Joseph, J.K., Inchtuthil: The Roman Legionary Fortress (1985), 203–244.Google Scholar

11 W.H. Manning, op. cit. (note 5), 48–49.

12 ibid., 140–146, 168–173.

13 ibid., 178.

14 ibid., 50, 51.

15 W.H. Manning, Report on the Excavations at Usk 1965–76; The Flavian Fort, (forthcoming).

16 For a discussion of the lagena, see Balsan, L. and Vernhet, A., Gallia xxix (1971).Google Scholar

17 Darling, M.J. in Dore, J. and Greene, K. (eds.). Roman Pottery Studies in Britain and Beyond BAR 530 (1977). 57–100.Google Scholar

18 Greene, K. in Detsicas, A. (ed.), Current Research in Romano-British Coarse Pottery, CBA Res. Rep. 10 (London 1973), 25–37.Google Scholar

19 For a more comprehensive study of the fine wares it is necessary to refer to Greene, K., Usk: The Pre-Flavian Fine Wares (Cardiff, 1979) and for the British ‘traded’ wares to Greene, op. cit. (note 18) and K. Greene and P.V. Webster, Coarse pottery from Usk excavations 1965–76 (forthcoming).Google Scholar

20 Spencer, B., BBCS xxx pt. 3 and 4, (1983).Google Scholar

21 Webster, P.V., Trans. Bristol Glos. Arch. Soc. xciv (1976), 18–46.Google Scholar

22 K. Greene, op. cit. (note 18).

23 W.H. Manning, op. cit. (note 5), 203–224.

24 Fischer, U., Cambodunumforschungen 1953, IIGoogle Scholar ; Keramik aus den Holzhäuser zwischen der 1 und 2 Querstrasse, Materialheft zur Bayerischen Vorgeschichte 10 (Kalmunz, 1957), taf. 25 no. 8.

25 Mountford, A.R., Gee, J. and Simpson, G., Staffs. Journ. Field Stud, viii (1968)Google Scholar , fig. 7 no. 28.

26 The rim-profiles associated with this fabric at Usk are K.F. Hartley, ‘Two major potteries in the first century A.D.’ in J. Dore and K. Greene, op. cit. (note 17), Group II (Gillam 238), and Group I.

27 The rim profiles associated with it are K.F. Hartley, op. cit. (note 26), Group I.

28 Peacock, D.P.S. and Williams, D.F., Amphorae and the Roman Economy: An introductory guide, (London, 1986).Google Scholar

29 P.R. Sealey, Amp horas from the 1970 Excavation at Colchester Sheepen, BAR 142 (1985), fig. 8 no. 71.

30 ibid., 62–64.

31 Liou, B., Gallia xl (1982), 444.Google Scholar

32 P.R. Sealey, op. cit. (note 29), 64; Colls, D.et al., ‘L'épave Port-Vendres II, et le Commerce de la Bétique à l'époque de Claude’, Archaeonautica 1 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar Examples are, however, now known from Flavian contexts, cf. D.R. Evans in A.G. Marvell et al., op. cit. (note 6).

33 Peacock, D.P.S., Antiq. Journ. lvii (1977).Google Scholar

34 idem.

35 P.R. Sealey, op. cit. (note 29), 82–83.

36 Peacock, D.P.S., Antiq. Journ. liv (1974).Google Scholar

37 Green, C. in Jones, D.M., Excavations at Billingsgate Buildings ‘Triangle’, Lower Thames Street, 1974, London Middlesex Arch. Soc. Spec. Pap. 4 (1980).Google Scholar

38 P.R. Sealey, op. cit. (note 29), 67–70; S. Martin-Kilcher, ‘Les amphoras romaines à huile de Bétique (Dressel 20 et 23) d'Augst (Colonia Augusta Rauricorum) et Kaiseraugust (Castra Rauracense) Un rapport préliminiare’ in J.M. Blazquez and J. Remsal (eds.), Prod y Corn de Acienten la Atigüdad II Congresso, Madrid, (1983).

39 D.P.S. Peacock, op. cit. (note 33).

40 Peacock, D.P.S. in Jesson, N. and Hill, D. (eds.). The Iron Age and Its Hill Forts (Southampton, 1971). 171.Google Scholar

41 D.P.S. Peacock, op. cit. (note 40). fig. 37.

42 Arthur, P., PBSR xxxvii (1982)Google Scholar , fig. 4. 5.

43 P.R. Sealey, op. cit. (note 29), fig. 7.

44 ibid., 95–98.

45 The lamp types referred to can be found in Loeschcke, S., Lampen aus Vindonissa (Zürich, 1919)Google Scholar ; Leibundgut, A., Die Römischen Lampen in der Schweiz (Bern, 1977)Google Scholar and Broneer, O., Corinth iv, ii Terracotta Lamps (Cambridge Mass., 1930).Google Scholar

46 For this figure-tvpe see Bailey, D., Catalogue of Lamps in the British Museum, ii-Roman lamps made in Italy (London, 1980), 80–81Google Scholar , Q 1086.

47 All the pieces recovered had been made from the same clay, identified by T. Darvill as being from the Severn Valley.

48 Evans, E.M. and Stapenhorst, C., ‘Roman boxtile manufacture in south east Wales’, Glamorgan-Gwent Arch. Trust Annual Rep. part ii 1983–84, (1985).Google Scholar

49 W.H. Manning, op. cit. (note 5), vii.

50 Cf. Cunliffe, B., Fifth Report on the Excavations of the Roman Fort at Richborough, Kent, Rep. Res. Comm. Soc. Antiq. London xxii (1968), pl. 26Google Scholar no. 1; Bushe-Fox, J.P., Fourth Report on the Excavations of the Roman Fort at Richborough, Kent, Rep. Res. Comm. Soc. Antiq. London xvi (1949), 25Google Scholar s, nos. 1, 2: and the instances from Hofheim, Ritterling, E., ‘Das frührömische Lager bei Hofheim im Taunus’, Annalen des Vereins Nassauische Altertumskunde und Geschichtsforschung II Wiesbaden (1913), 120Google Scholar , fig. 22 and Neuss, Nissen, H.et al., ‘Novaesium’, Bonner Jb (1904)Google Scholar , taf. X, quoted by Lady Aileen Fox in the discussion of the Richborough IV La Tene II brooches.

51 Cf. an item from Usk, J. Webster, Bronze Objects from Usk Excavations 1966–73, (forthcoming) and one from Longthorpe, Frere, S.S. and St Joseph, J.K., Britannia v (1974). 49. fig. 26. no. 22.Google Scholar

52 Robinson, H.R.. The Armour of Imperial Rome (London. 1975). 176. fig. 178: 175. fig. 180.Google Scholar

53 For a discussion of these fittings and further parallels see J. Webster, op. cit. (note 51).

54 ibid.

55 ibid.

56 Cf. Brailsford, J.S., Hod Hill Vol I: Antiquities from Hod Hill in the Durden Collection (British Museum London, 1962) fig. 1, A6, pl. 1Google Scholar ; Webster, G., Arch. Journ. cxv (1958) 71Google Scholar , fig. 3, no. 7 from Broxtowe Notts; Neuss, op. cit. (note 50), taf. XX.A, no. 36, (a complete mount); the ‘sword of Tiberius’ in the British Museum. British Museum Greek and Roman guide (1920), 105, fig. 109; Manning, W.H.. Catalogue of the Romano-British Iron Tools, Fittings and Weapons in the British Museum (London, 1985), 149 pl. xxi.Google Scholar For a full discussion of the method of fastening see Ulbert, G., Germania xlvii (1969), 115–118.Google Scholar

57 Grimes, W.F., ‘Holt, Denbighshire: The works-depot of the Twentieth Legion at Castle Lyons’, Y Cymmrodor xli (1930), 209Google Scholar , fig. 56 no. 21.

58 For a strigli with a similar pattern of ribbing on the back of the blade see for example Ulbert, G., Das frührömische Kastell Rheingönheim, Limes. Bd 9 (Berlin, 1969)Google Scholar , taf. 39, no. 6.

59 Mau, A. (English translation by Kelsey, F.W.), Pompeii: Its Life and Art (New York, 1899), 371Google Scholar , fig. 201.

60 Wacher, J. and McWhirr, A., Early Roman Occupation at Cirencester: Cirencester Excavations 1 (Cirencester, 1982), 114–5Google Scholar , no. 127, fig. 39.

61 Cf. G. Ulbert, op. cit. (note 56), esp. tafs. 17–19, 26, 27.

62 Cf. W.H. Manning, op. cit. (note 56), 92–93.

63 Garbsch, J., Bayerische Vorgeschichtsblätter xl (1975), esp. 73–81.Google Scholar

64 Compare an example from Housesteads, Manning, W.H., Catalogue of Roman-British Ironwork in the Museum of Antiquities Newcastle upon Tyne (Dept of Arch. Univ. of Newcastle, 1976)Google Scholar , no. 76.

65 Harden, D.B. and Price, J. in Cunliffe, B., Excavations at Fishbourne 1961–69, Vol II The finds, Rep. Comm. Soc. Antiq. London xxvi (1971), 322.Google Scholar

66 Boon, G.C., Journ. Glass Stud, viii (1960), 41ff.Google Scholar

67 Isings, C., Roman Glass from Dated Finds (Groningen, 1957), 19–20Google Scholar , form, 36.

68 D.B. Harden and J. Price, op. cit. (note 65), 320–1; Charlesworth, D. in Frere, S.S., Verulamium Excavations I, Rep. Res. Comm. Soc. Antiq. London xv (1972), 198–9.Google Scholar

69 Price, J. in du Plat-Taylor, J. and Cleere, H.F., Roman Shipping and Trade: Britain and the Rhine Provinces. CBA Res. Rep. 24 (London, 1978), 74.Google Scholar

70 C. Isings, op. cit. (note 67), forms 52, 55 and 67c.

71 Price, J. in ‘Excavations at Lincoln Road, London Borough of Enfieid, Nov 1974-March 1976’, Trans. London Middlesex Arch. Soc. xxviii (1977), 155–8Google Scholar , no. 2, fig. 27 2. pl. 7.

72 Unpublished excavations directed by Mr H. Hurst.

73 Their characteristics and dating have been discussed by Charlesworth, D., Journ. Glass Stud, viii (1966)Google Scholar and ibid., Stud. in Glass Hist. and Design (1970), 6–8.

74 Several of these counters have been found at Caerleon, Nash-Williams, V.E., Arch. Camb. lxxxvi (1932), 92Google Scholar , no. 9–11 and at Price, Whitton J. in Jarrett, M.G. and Wrathmell, S., Whitton: An Iron Age and Roman Farmstead in South Glamorgan (Cardiff, 1981), 159–60Google Scholar , nos. 38–41, fig. 66, pl. 18.

75 Methods of manufacture have been briefly discussed recently with reference to examples from Whitton, J. Price, op. cit. (note 74), 162, 29–30, pl. 18.

76 J. Price, op. cit. (note 74), 161, nos. 8–9, pl. 18.

77 For the typology of the metal-working debris noted here, see McDonnel, G., Current Arch. 86 (1983)Google Scholar and Bayley, J. in Phillips, M.P. (ed.), The Archaeologist and the Laboratory, CBA Res. Rep. 58 (1985).Google Scholar Justine Bayley has examined the crucibles and I am grateful for her comments incorporated here.

78 Platt, C. and Coleman-Smith, R., Excavations in Medieval Southampton 1953–1969 vol 1; The excavation reports (Leicester, 1975), 298.Google Scholar

79 Christie, P.M. and Coad, J.G., Arch. Journ. cxxxvii (1980), 178.Google Scholar

80 S.S. Frere, op. cit. (note 68), 146 no. 184.

81 Identification by Kate Hunter, University College Cardiff.

82 For a more detailed discussion see Atkins, F.B. in Brodribb, A.C.C.et al., Excavations at Shakenoak Farm nr Wilcot Oxfordshire vol II, Privately Printed, (Oxford, 1971).Google Scholar