Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T03:45:19.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What is Known About Transitional Living Services for Adults With an Acquired Brain Injury? A Scoping Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2017

Anna Potter ,
Danielle Sansonetti ,
Kate D'Cruz  and
Natasha Lannin
Anna Potter
Affiliation:
Acquired Brain Injury Rehabilitation Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Danielle Sansonetti
Affiliation:
Acquired Brain Injury Rehabilitation Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Kate D'Cruz
Affiliation:
Occupational Therapy, School of Allied Health, LaTrobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Natasha Lannin*
Affiliation:
Occupational Therapy, School of Allied Health, LaTrobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
*
Address for correspondence: Associate Professor Natasha Lannin, Level 4, The Alfred Centre, 99 Commercial Rd, Prahran 3181, Victoria, Australia. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

Transitional living service (TLS) programmes for adults with an acquired brain injury are considered an important part of rehabilitation. However, considerable variability exists in the design and structure of these services, with limited research to guide the development of a programme based on best evidence. A scoping literature review was completed to answer the question ‘What is known about TLS programmes for adults with an acquired brain injury?’ Four electronic databases were systematically searched, followed by a grey literature search (from 1996 to 2015). 3183 articles were screened and 13 articles were included in the final review. Themes that emerged from the literature include the types of residents using TLS programmes, the subjective experience of residents and staff, intervention approaches, programme staffing, and programme outcomes. The research reviewed supports the use of TLS programmes to maximise functional independence and community integration of individuals with an acquired brain injury. Clinical practise recommendations were developed to help support implementation of TLS programmes based on best evidence, these included: to use multiple outcome measures, implement collaborative goal setting, support generalisation of skills learnt in the TLS to the home environment and for eligibility criteria for these programmes to include individuals across all phases of recovery.

Keywords

transitional living servicesacquired brain injurytraumatic brain injurystrokebrain injuriesstrokeassisted living servicesassisted living facilities
Type
Review Article
Information
Brain Impairment , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , September 2017 , pp. 240 - 257
Copyright
Copyright © Australasian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8 (1), 19–32.Google Scholar
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2007). Disability in Australia: acquired brain injury. Bulletin no. 55. Cat no. AUS 96. Canberra: AIHW.Google Scholar
Benge, J.F., Caroselli, J.S., Reed, K., & Zgaljardic, D.J. (2010). Changes in supervision needs following participation in a residential post-acute brain injury rehabilitation programme. Brain Injury, 24 (6), 844–850.Google Scholar
Bottari, C., Dutil, E., Dassa, C., & Rainville, C. (2006). Choosing the most appropriate environment to evaluate independence in everyday activities: Home or clinic? Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 53 (2), 98–106.Google Scholar
Chapparo, C. & Shepherd, B. (2010). When work happens in the house: Perceptions of how residential care staff choose to spend work time in transitional living units for people with brain injury. Work, 36 (2), 239–247.Google Scholar
D'Cruz, K., Unsworth, C., Roberts, K., Morarty, J., Turner-Stokes, L., Wellington-Boyd, A., . . . Lannin, N. (2016). Engaging patients with moderate to severe acquired brain injury in goal setting. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 23 (1), 20–31.Google Scholar
Doig, E., Fleming, J., Kuipers, P., & Cornwell, P. (2010). Comparison of rehabilitation outcomes in day hospital and home settings for people with acquired brain injury – a systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32 (25), 2061–2077.Google Scholar
Douglas, J.M., Dyson, M., & Foreman, P. (2006). Increasing leisure activity following severe traumatic brain injury: Does it make a difference? Brain Impairment, 7 (2), 107–118.Google Scholar
Duchnick, J.J., Ropacki, S., Yutsis, M., Petska, K., & Pawlowski, C. (2015). Transitional rehabilitation programs: Comprehensive rehabilitation for community integration after brain injury. Psychological Services In the Public Domain, 12 (3), 313– 321.Google Scholar
Eicher, V., Murphy, M.P., Murphy, T.F., & Malec, J.F. (2012). Progress assessed with the mayo-portland adaptability inventory in 604 participants in 4 types of post-inpatient rehabilitation brain injury programs. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 93 (1), 100–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geurtsen, G.J., Heugten, C.M., Martina, J.D., Rietveld, A.C., Meijer, R. & Geurts, A.C. (2011). A prospective study to evaluate a residential community reintegration program for patients with chronic acquired brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 92 (5), 696–704.Google Scholar
Geurtsen, G.J., Heugten, C.M., Martina, J.D., Rietveld, A.C., Meijer, R., & Geurts, A.C. (2012). Three-year follow-up results of a residential community reintegration program for patients with chronic acquired brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 93 (5), 908–911.Google Scholar
Geurtsen, G.J., Martina, J.D., Heugten, V., & Geurts, A.C. (2008). A prospective study to evaluate a new residential community reintegration programme for severe chronic brain injury: The brain integration programme. Brain Injury, 22 (7–8), 545–554.Google Scholar
Geurtsen, G.J., Heugten, V., Martina, J., & Geurts, A.C. (2010). Comprehensive rehabilitation programmes in the chronic phase after severe brain injury: A systematic review. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 42 (2) 97–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gill, I.J., Wall, G., & Simpson, J. (2012). Clients’ perspectives of rehabilitation in one acquired brain injury residential rehabilitation unit: A thematic analysis. Brain Injury, 26 (7–8), 909–920.Google Scholar
Haskins, E., Cicerone, K., Dams-O'Connor, K., Eberle, R., Langenbahn, D., Shapiro-Rosenbaum, A. & Trexler, L. (2012). Cognitive rehabilitation manual: Translating evidence-based recommendations into practice, USA: American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.Google Scholar
Hopman, K. (2006). Transitional living program evaluation (Stage one report). Australia: NSW Health.Google Scholar
Hopman, K., Tate, R.L., & McCluskey, A. (2012). Community-based rehabilitation following brain injury: Comparison of a transitional living program and a home-based program. Brain Impairment, 13 (1), 44–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, H., Clouteir, G., & Levert, M. (2008). Perspectives of survivors of traumatic brain injury and their caregivers on long-term social integration. Brain Injury, 22 (7–8), 535–543 Google Scholar
Levack, W., Kayes, N., & Fadyl, J. (2010). Experience of recovery and outcome following traumatic brain injury: A metasynthesis of qualitative research. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32 (12), 986–999.Google Scholar
McColl, M.A., Davies, D., Carlson, P., Johnston, J., Harrick, L., Minnes, P., & Shue, K. (1999). Transitions to independent living after ABI. Brain Injury, 13 (5), 311–330.Google Scholar
Mitchell, E., Veitch, C., & Passey, M. (2014). Efficacy of leisure intervention groups in rehabilitation of people with an acquired brain injury. Disability and Rehabilitation, 36 (17), 1474–1482.Google Scholar
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151 (4), 264–269.Google Scholar
Piccenna, L., Pattuwage, L., Romero, L., Lewis, V., Gruen, R.L., & Bragge, P. (2015, January). Briefing document: Optimising return to work practices following catastrophic injury. Melbourne, Australia: NTRI Forum.Google Scholar
Ponsford, J., Sloan, S., & Snow, P. (2013). TBI: Rehabilitation for everyday living (2 ed.). England: Lawrence Erbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sachs, P. (1986). Family guide for evaluating transitional living programs for head injured adults. Cognitive Rehabilitation, 4 (6), 6–9.Google Scholar
Simpson, G., Scheny, T., Lane-Brown, A., Strettles, B., Ferry, K., & Phillips, J. (2004). Post-acute rehabilitation for people with traumatic brain injury: A model description and evaluation of the liverpool hospital transitional living program. Brain Impairment, 5 (1), 67–80.Google Scholar
Sloan, S., Callaway, L., Winkler, D., McKinley, K., Zino, C., & Anson, K. (2009). The community approach to participation: Outcomes following acquired brain injury intervention. Brain Impairment, 10 (3), 262–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tate, R., Wakim, D., & Genders, M. (2014). A systematic review of the efficacy of community-based, leisure/social activity programmes for people with traumatic brain injury. Brain Impairment, 15 (3), 157–176.Google Scholar
Thomas, D. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27 (2), 237–246.Google Scholar
Turner, B.J., Fleming, J.M., Ownsworth, T.L., & Cornwell, P.L. (2008). The transition from hospital to home for individuals with acquired brain injury: A literature review and research recommendations. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30 (16), 1153–1176.Google Scholar
United Nations. (2016). The standard rules for the equalization of opportunities for persons with disabilities. Retrieved from: http://un.org/esa/socdev/enable/dissre00.htm.Google Scholar
Willer, B., Button, J., & Rempel, R. (1999). Residential and home-based post-acute rehabilitation of individuals with traumatic brain injury: A case control study. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 80 (4), 399–406.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO). (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar