Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T08:10:31.581Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pre-Injury, Injury and Early Post-Injury Predictors of Long-Term Functional and Psychosocial Recovery After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2012

Robyn L. Tate*
Affiliation:
Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney and Royal Rehabilitation Centre Sydney, Australia.
G. Anthony Broe
Affiliation:
Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, University of New South Wales and Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Ian D. Cameron
Affiliation:
Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney and Royal Rehabilitation Centre Sydney, Australia.
Adeline E. Hodgkinson
Affiliation:
Brain Injury Rehabilitation Unit, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Cheryl A. Soo
Affiliation:
Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney and Royal Rehabilitation Centre Sydney, Australia.
*
Address for correspondence: Robyn Tate, PhD, Associate Professor, Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Royal Rehabilitation Centre Sydney, PO Box 6, Ryde NSW 1680, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Background: Findings from prognostic studies of functional and psychosocial recovery after traumatic brain injury (TBI) reported to date have been limited by the restricted timeframe for prediction, generally within the first 5 years post-trauma. This investigation examined prediction of functional and psychosocial recovery in the medium-term (6 years post-trauma; Time 1) and long-term (23 years post-trauma; Time 2). Methods: The participants comprised a consecutive series of the first 100 patients with severe TBI receiving their primary rehabilitation at a regionally based unit. At the 23-year follow-up, 91% of the sample was traced: 17 had died, 5 declined participation, and 69 were interviewed, with 68 participating at both Time 1 and Time 2. Five outcome domains were examined: mobility, self-care, employability, relationships and living skills. Results: Very few of seven pre-injury variables were significantly correlated with any of the outcome variables. A series of logistic regression analyses successfully predicted levels of recovery in all domains using four predictor variables: pre-injury occupational status, duration of post-traumatic amnesia, and physical and neuropsychological disability at rehabilitation discharge. At Time 1, 60% or more of the variance was accounted for in four of the five domains, and at Time 2, more than 40% of the variance was accounted for in all domains. Sensitivity ranged from 62% (self-care) to 90% (mobility). With a single exception (employability at Time 2), specificity was also high, ranging from 80% (relationships) to 98% (mobility). Comparable accuracy rates were also found for positive and negative predictive power. Conclusions: These results demonstrate impressive predictive capacity of early post-trauma variables for the very long-term levels of recovery. They provide guidance for the tailoring of individual rehabilitation programs and the identification of people who may require special supports after rehabilitation discharge.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)