Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:22:48.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Measurement of Sociomoral Reasoning in Adolescents With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Pilot Investigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2012

Julian J. Dooley ,
Miriam Beauchamp  and
Vicki A. Anderson
Julian J. Dooley*
Affiliation:
Child Health Promotion Research Centre, Edith Cowan University, Australia. [email protected]
Miriam Beauchamp
Affiliation:
University of Montreal, Canada.
Vicki A. Anderson
Affiliation:
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; University of Melbourne, Australia.
*
*Address for correspondence: Julian J Dooley, Senior Research Fellow, Scientific Director Cyber-bullying, Child Health Promotion Research Centre, Edith Cowan University, 2 Bradford St, Mount Lawley WA 6050, Australia.
Get access

Abstract

Moral reasoning skills are crucial for appropriate and adaptive social functioning. Impairments in moral reasoning have been associated with aggressive and violent behaviours. Traditional measures of moral reasoning may provide limited insight into daily behavioural functioning as these measures are dependent on several higher order cognitive skills and, as such, may be limited in their utility with certain clinical populations. In Study 1, new measures of sociomoral reasoning and maturity, the So-Moral and So-Mature, were described. Further, the psychometric properties of the So-Moral and So-Mature were investigated in a sample of 50 adolescents aged 11 to 19 (mean age = 14.5, SD = 2.6 years, 25 male). Preliminary support was found for the validity and reliability of both tasks. In Study 2, the clinical applicability of the So-Moral and So-Mature were examined in a sample 25 adolescents with traumatic brain injury (TBI; mean age = 13.8, SD = 2.3 years, 15 male). Response trends suggested that adolescents with TBI generated less developmentally mature responses to sociomoral dilemmas and those with more severe injuries performed most poorly. The sociomoral reasoning tasks described promote participant's emotional involvement and investment as well as being appropriate for use with clinical populations.

Keywords

traumatic brain injurymoral reasoningaggression
Type
Articles
Information
Brain Impairment , Volume 11 , Issue 2: Special Issue – Outcome Measurement for Children and Adolescents With Brain Impairment , 01 September 2010 , pp. 152 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)