Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T12:07:20.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Things that Help, the Things that Get in the Way: Working Together to Improve Outcome Following Acquired Brain Injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2018

Jacinta M. Douglas Open the ORCID record for Jacinta M. Douglas [Opens in a new window]
Jacinta M. Douglas*
Affiliation:
Living with Disability Research Centre, School of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia Moving Ahead, Centre for Research Excellence in Brain Recovery, Sydney, Australia Summer Foundation, Victoria, Australia
*
Address for correspondence: Professor Jacinta Douglas, Living with Disability Research Centre, College of Science Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3086, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Working in neurological rehabilitation brings with it numerous opportunities to gain an understanding of the factors that contribute to shaping meaningful living and wellbeing for those tackling the major life changes encountered following acquired brain injury (ABI). These opportunities come in many forms: challenging and brave clients, wise and worrying families, questioning and inspiring colleagues, empowering and limiting work environments and rigid and advancing policy and legislative contexts.

Our personal and collective understanding of the things that help and the things that get in the way of effective rehabilitation continuously emerges from the convergence of the experience and knowledge afforded by these opportunities. The aim of this paper is to consider the things that help and the things that get in the way as they have been identified by people with ABI, their families and those who work with them and have been further evidenced through research targeted towards improving short, medium and long-term outcomes for those living with the consequences of ABI. These things as discussed in this paper capture the essential role of the self, the importance of rights and access to rehabilitation, the impact of the family and the contribution of social connection.

Keywords

acquired brain injuryoutcomerehabilitationselfidentityfamilyfriends
Type
Presidential address
Information
Brain Impairment , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , December 2018 , pp. 258 - 269
Copyright
Copyright © Australasian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AIHW (2007). Disability prevalence and trends. Disability series, AIHW. Bulletin 55, Dec.Google Scholar
Andelic, N., Bautz-Holter, E., Ronning, P., Olafsen, K., Sigurdardottir, S., Schanke, A., . . . Roe, C. (2012). Does an early onset and continuous chain of rehabilitation improve the long-term functional outcome of patients with severe traumatic brain injury? Journal of Neurotrauma, 29 (1), 66–74.Google Scholar
Barry, S., & Douglas, J. (2000). The social integration of individuals with aphasia. Advances in Speech Language Pathology, 2 (2), 77–91.Google Scholar
Barry, S., Knox, L., & Douglas, J. (2018) “Time's up”: The experience of entering residential aged care for young people with acquired brain injury and their families. Brain Impairment, 19 (3).Google Scholar
Cahill, S., O'Nolan, C., O'Caheny, D., & Boberksy, A. (2014). An Irish national survey of dementia in long-term residential care. Dublin (Ireland): Dementia Services Information and Development Centre.Google Scholar
Callaway, L., Sloan, S., & Winkler, D. (2005). Maintaining and developing friendships following severe traumatic brain injury: Principles of occupational therapy practice. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 52 (3), 257–260.Google Scholar
Cameron, G., Pirozzo, S., & Tooth, L. (2001). Long-term care of people below age 65 with severe acquired brain injury: Appropriateness of aged care facilities. Australia New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 25 (3), 261–64.Google Scholar
Campbell, J., Trapnell, P., Heine, S., Katz, I., Lavallee, L., & Lehman, D. (1996). Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates and cultural boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70 (1), 141–156.Google Scholar
Canadian Institute for Health Information (2013). When a nursing home is home: How do Canadian nursing homes measure up on quality? Ottawa, Canada: Author.Google Scholar
Cantor, J., Ashman, T., Schwartz, M., Gordon, W., Hibbard, M., Brown, M., . . . Cheng, Z. (2005). The role of self-discrepancy theory in understanding post-traumatic brain injury affective disorders: A pilot study. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 20 (2), 527–543.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. (2004). Americans satisfied with number of friends, closeness of friendships. Gallup. Retrieved from http://news.gallup.com/poll/10891/americans-satisfied-number-friends-closeness-friendships.aspxGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, D. (2006). The experience of surviving traumatic brain injury. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 54 (4), 407–417.Google Scholar
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Charmaz, K. (2009). Shifting the grounds: Constructivist grounded theory methods. In Morse, J.M. et al. (Ed.), Developing grounded theory: The second generation (pp. 127–193). Walnut Creek, California: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
Clare, L., Nellis, S.M., Whitaker, C.J., Martyr, A., Markova, I.S., Roth, I., . . . Morris, R.G. (2012). Marital relationship quality in early-stage dementia: Perspectives from people with dementia and their spouses. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 26 (1), 148–158.Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia (2017). Senate community affairs legislation committee: estimates – Proof committee hansard. Canberra, Australia: Author.Google Scholar
Corrigan, J., Bogner, J., Mysiw, W., Clinchot, D., & Fugate, L. (2001). Life satisfaction after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 16 (6), 543–555.Google Scholar
Delle Fave, A., Brdar, A., Wissing, M., & Vella-Brodrick, D. (2013). Sources and motives for personal meaning in adulthood. The Journal of Positive Psychology: Dedicated to Furthering Research and Promoting Good Practice, 8 (6), 517–529.Google Scholar
Dikman, S., Machamer, J., Powell, J., & Temkin, N. (2003). Outcome 3 to 5 years after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84 (10), 1449–1457.Google Scholar
Douglas, J. (under review). Loss of friendship following traumatic brain injury: A model grounded in the experience of adults with severe injury.Google Scholar
Douglas, J. (2002). Long-term adjustment following severe traumatic brain injury. In Proceedings of victorian brain injury recovery association annual workshop (pp. 3–11). Melbourne, Victoria: VBIRA.Google Scholar
Douglas, J. (2010). Placing brain injury rehabilitation in the context of the self and meaningful engagement. Seminars in Speech & Language, 31 (3), 197– 204.Google Scholar
Douglas, J. (2013). Conceptualising self and maintaining social connection following severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 27 (1), 60–74.Google Scholar
Douglas, J. (2015). Placing therapy in the context of the self and social connection. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17 (3), 199–210.Google Scholar
Douglas, J. (2017). “So that's the way it is for me-always being left out.” Acquired pragmatic language impairment and social functioning following traumatic brain Injury. Brain Impairment, 18 (3), 321–331.Google Scholar
Douglas, J., Drummond, M., Knox, L., & Mealings, M. (2015). Rethinking social-relational perspectives in rehabilitation: Traumatic brain injury as a case study (chapter 8). In McPherson, K., Gibson, B.E., & Leplege, A., (Eds.), Rethinking rehabilitation theory (pp. 137–162). Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, J., Knox, L., De Maio, C., & Bridge, H. (2014). Improving communication-specific coping after traumatic brain injury: Evaluation of a new treatment using single case experimental design. Brain Impairment, 15 (3), 190–201.Google Scholar
Douglas, J., & Spellacy, F. (1996). Indicators of long-term family functioning following severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Brain Injury, 10 (11), 819– 839.Google Scholar
Douglas, J., & Spellacy, F. (2000). Correlates of depression in adults with severe traumatic brain injury and their carers. Brain Injury, 14 (1), 71–88.Google Scholar
Draper, K., Ponsford, J., & Schönberger, M. (2007). Psychosocial and emotional outcome following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 22 (5), 278–287.Google Scholar
Fries, B., Wodchis, W., Blaum, C., Buttar, A., Drabek, J., & Morris, J. (2005). A national study showed that diagnoses varied by age group in nursing home residents under age 65. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58 (2), 198–205.Google Scholar
Ford, A., Douglas, J., & O'Halloran, R. (2018). The experience of close personal relationships from the perspective of people with aphasia: thematic analysis of the literature. Aphasiology, 32 (4), 367–393.Google Scholar
Gray, D. (2000). Slow-to-recover severe traumatic brain injury: A review of outcomes and rehabilitation effectiveness. Brain Injury, 14, 1003–1014.Google Scholar
Hanks, R.A., Rapport, L.J., Wertheimer, J., & Koviak, C. (2012). Randomized controlled trial of peer mentoring for individuals with traumatic brain injury and their significant others. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93 (8), 1297– 1304.Google Scholar
Harris-Kojetin, L., Sengupta, M., Park-Lee, E., Valverde, R., Caffrey, C., Rome, V., & Lendon, J. (2016). Long-term care providers and services users in the United States: data from the national study of long-term care providers, 2013–2014. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
Johnson, K., & Davis, P. (1998). A supported relationships intervention to increase the social integration of persons with traumatic brain injuries. Behavior Modification, 22 (4), 502–528.Google Scholar
Jourdan, C., Bayen, E., Pradat-Diehl, P., Ghout, I., Darnoux, E., Azerad, S., . . . Azouvi, P. (2016). A comprehensive picture of 4-year outcome of severe brain injuries. Results from the PariS-TBI study. Annals of Physical Rehabilitation Medicine, 59 (5), 100–106.Google Scholar
Jumisko, E., Lexell, J., & Soderberg, A. (2005). The meaning of living with traumatic brain injury in people with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 37 (1), 42–50.Google Scholar
Klein, S. (2010). The self: As a construct in psychology and neuropsychological evidence for its multiplicity. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1 (2), 172–183.Google Scholar
Klinger, L. (2005). Occupational adaptation: Perspectives of people with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Occupational Science, 12 (1), 9–16.Google Scholar
Knox, L. & Douglas, J. (2018). A scoping review of the nature and outcomes of extended rehabilitation programs after very severe brain injury. Brain Injury, 32 (8), 1000–1010.Google Scholar
Knox, L., Douglas, J., & Bigby, C. (2017). “I've never been a yes person”: Decision-making participation and self-conceptualisation after severe traumatic brain injury. Disability and Rehabilitation, 39 (22), 2250–2260.Google Scholar
Kratz, A., Sander, A., Brickell, T., Lange, R., & Carlozzi, N. (2017). Traumatic brain injury caregivers: A qualitative analysis of spouse and parent perspectives on quality of life. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 27 (1), 16–37.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, H., Cloutier, G., & Levert, J. (2008). Perspectives of survivors of traumatic brain injury and their caregivers on long-term social integration. Brain Injury, 22 (7–8), 535–543.Google Scholar
Levack, W., Kayes, N., & Fadyl, J. (2010). Experience of recovery and outcome following traumatic brain injury: A meta synthesis of qualitative research. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32 (12), 986–999.Google Scholar
Maggio, M., De Luca, R., Torrisi, M., De Cola, M., Buda, A., Rosano, M., . . . Calabro, (2018). Is there a correlation between family functioning and functional recovery in patients with acquired brain injury? An exploratory study. Applied Nursing Research, 41 (1), 11–14.Google Scholar
McColl, M., Carlson, P., Johnston, J., Minnes, P., Shue, K., & Davies, D. (1998). The definition of community integration: Perspectives of people with brain injuries. Brain Injury, 12 (1), 15–30.Google Scholar
McMillan, T., & Laurie, M. (2004). Young adults with acquired brain injury in nursing homes in Glasgow. Clinical Rehabilitation, 18, 132–38.Google Scholar
Mealings, M., & Douglas, J. (2010). ‘School's a big part of your life. . .’: Adolescent perspectives of their school participation following Traumatic Brain Injury. Brain Impairment, 11 (1), 1–16.Google Scholar
Mealings, M., Douglas, J., & Olver, J. (2017). Beyond academic performance: Practice implications for working with students following traumatic brain injury. International Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 19 (5), 441–453.Google Scholar
Morf, C. (2005). Editorial: Affirming the self as construct and journal. Self Identity, 4 (2), 97–100.Google Scholar
Muenchberger, H., Kendall, E., & Neal, R. (2008). Identity transition following traumatic brain injury: A dynamic process of contraction, expansion and tentative balance. Brain Injury, 22 (12), 979–992.Google Scholar
Nakase-Richardson, R., Whyte, J., Giacino, J., Pavawalla, S., Barnett, S., Yablon, S., . . . Walker, W. (2012). Longitudinal outcome of patients with disordered consciousness in the NIDRR TBI model systems programs. Journal of Neurotrauma, 29 (1), 59–65.Google Scholar
Nichols, J., & Kosciulek, J. (2014). Social interactions of individuals with Traumatic brain injury. Journal of Rehabilitation, 80 (2), 21–29.Google Scholar
Nochi, M. (1998). “Loss of self” in the narratives of people with traumatic brain injuries: A qualitative analysis. Social Science and Medicine, 46 (7), 869– 878.Google Scholar
Nochi, M. (2000). Reconstructing self-narratives in coping with traumatic brain injury. Social Science and Medicine, 51 (1), 1795–1804.Google Scholar
O'Connor, K., & Chamberlain, K. (2000). Dimensions and discourses of meaning in life: Approaching meaning from qualitative perspectives. In Reker, G.T., & Chamberlain, K. (Eds.), Exploring existential meaning: Optimising human development across the life span (pp. 75–91). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
O'Reilly, K., & Pryor, J. (2002). Young people with brain injury in nursing homes: Not the best option!. Australian Health Review, 25 (1), 46–51.Google Scholar
Ouellet, M., Morin, C., & Lavoie, A. (2009). Volunteer work and psychological health following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 24 (4), 262–271.Google Scholar
Ownsworth, T. (2014). Self identity after brain injury. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, S., & Herbert, C. (2016). Friendships and intimacy: Promoting the maintenance and development of relationships in residential neurorehabilitation. NeuroRehabilitation, 38 (3), 291–298.Google Scholar
Perlesz, A., Kinsella, G., & Crowe, S. (1999). Impact of traumatic brain injury on the family: A critical review. Rehabilitation Psychology, 44 (I), 6–35.Google Scholar
Persson, D., & Ostwald, S. (2009). Younger residents in nursing homes. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 35 (1), 22–31.Google Scholar
Pierce, C., & Hanks, R. (2006). Life satisfaction after traumatic brain injury and the world health organization model of disability. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85 (11), 889– 898.Google Scholar
Pound, P., Gompertz, P., & Ebrahim, S. (1998). A patient-centred study of the consequences of stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation, 12 (4), 338–347.Google Scholar
Pozzebon, M., Douglas, J., & Ames, D. (2016). Spouses’ experience of living with a partner diagnosed with a dementia: A synthesis of the qualitative research. International Psychogeriatrics, 28 (4), 537– 556.Google Scholar
Pozzebon, M., Douglas, J., & Ames, D. (2018). Facing the challenges of primary progressive aphasia: The spousal perspective. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61 (9), 2292–2312.Google Scholar
Rissanen, L., Ehrlich, C., Kendall, E., & Zeeman, H. (2014). Realizing person centred care in residential care facilities for young adults with complex and chronic disabilities: The understanding, perception and beliefs of workers. European Journal of Person Centered Healthcare, 2 (1), 190–200.Google Scholar
Sabat, A., Moodley, L., & Kathard, H. (2006). Identity construction following traumatic brain injury: A case study. South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 53 (1), 17–26.Google Scholar
Salas, C., Casassus, M., Rowlands, L., Pimm, S, & Flanagan, D. (2016). “Relating through sameness”: A qualitative study of friendship and social isolation in chronic traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2016.1247730.Google Scholar
Shaddon, B., Hagstrom, F., & Koski, P. (2008). Life stories and the narrative self. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.Google Scholar
Shepherd-Banigan, M., Shapiro, A., McDuffie, J., Brancu, M., Sperber, N., Van Houtven, C., . . . Williams, J. Jr (2018). Interventions that support or involve caregivers or families of patients with traumatic injury: A systematic review. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 33 (7), 1177–1186.Google Scholar
Shorland, J., & Douglas, J. (2010). Understanding the role of communication in maintaining and forming friendships following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 24 (4), 569–580.Google Scholar
Smith, M. (2004). Under the circumstances: The experiences of younger people living in residential aged care facilities. Contemporary Nurse, 16 (3), 188–198.Google Scholar
Steadman-Pare, D., Colantonio, A., Ratcliff, G., Chase, S., & Vernich, L. (2001). Factors associated with perceived quality of life many years after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 16 (4), 330–342.Google Scholar
Stein, K., & Markus, H. (1996). The role of the self in behavioral change. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 6 (4), 349–384.Google Scholar
Struchen, M., Davis, L., Bogaards, J., Hudler Hall, T., Clark, A., Mazzei, D., . . . Caroselli, J. (2011). Making connections after brain injury: Development and evaluation of social peer-mentoring program for persons with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 26 (1), 4–19.Google Scholar
Tam, S., McKay, A., Sloan, S., & Ponsford, J. (2015). The experience of challenging behaviours following severe TBI: A family perspective. Brain Injury, 29 (7–8), 813–821.Google Scholar
Tate, R., Broe, G., Cameron, I., Hodgkinson, A., & Soo, C. (2005). Pre-injury, injury and early post-injury predictors of long-term functional and psychosocial recovery after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Impairment, 6 (2), 81–96.Google Scholar
Tate, R., Kennedy, M., Ponsford, J., Douglas, J., Velikonja, M., Bayley, M., & Stergiou-Kita, M. On behalf of the INCOG Expert Panel (2014). INCOG recommendations for management of cognition following TBI Part III: Executive function and self-awareness. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 29 (4), 338–352.Google Scholar
Togher, L., Wiseman-Hakes, C., Douglas, J., Stergiou-Kita, M., Ponsford, J., Teasell, R., . . . Turkstra, L. On behalf of the INCOG Expert Panel (2014). INCOG recommendations for management of cognition following TBI Part IV: Cognitive communication. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 29 (4), 353–368.Google Scholar
Turner-Stokes, L. (2007). Cost-efficiency of longer-stay rehabilitation programmes: can they provide value for money?. Brain Injury, 21 (10), 1015–1021.Google Scholar
Turner-Stokes, L., Williams, H., Bill, A., Bassett, P., & Sephton, K. (2016). Cost efficiency of specialist inpatient rehabilitation for working-aged adults with complex neurological disabilities: A multicenter cohort analysis of a national clinical data set. BMJ Open, 6: e012112.Google Scholar
Tyerman, A., & Humphrey, M. (1984). Changes in self-concept following severe head injury. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 7 (1), 1–23.Google Scholar
United Nations (UN) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) UN General Assembly. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: resolution, in A/RES/61/106. 2007.Google Scholar
Vickery, C., Gontovsky, S., & Caroselli, J. (2005). Self-concept and quality of life following acquired brain injury: A pilot investigation. Brain Injury, 19 (1), 657–655.Google Scholar
Von Groote, P., Bickenbach, J., & Gutenbrunner, C. (2011). The world report on disability - implications, perspectives and opportunities for physical and rehabilitation medicine. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 43 (11), 869–875.Google Scholar
Winkler, D., Farnworth, L., & Sloan, S. (2006). People under 60 living in aged care facilities in Victoria. Australian Health Review, 30 (1), 100–108.Google Scholar
Winkler, D., Farnworth, L., Sloan, S., & Brown, T. (2011). Moving from aged care facilities to community-based accommodation: Outcomes and environmental factors. Brain Injury, 25 (2), 153–168.Google Scholar
Winkler, D., Sloan, S., & Callaway, L. (2010) People under 50 with acquired brain injury living in residential aged care. Brain Impairment, 11 (3), 299–312.Google Scholar
Ylvisaker, M., & Feeney, T. (2000a). Reflections on Dobermans, poodles and social rehabilitation for difficult-to-serve individuals with traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology, 14 (4), 407–431.Google Scholar
Ylvisaker, M., & Feeney, T. (2000b). Reconstruction of identity after brain injury. Brain Impairment, 1 (1), 12–28.Google Scholar
Ylvisaker, M., McPherson, K., Kayes, N., & Pellett, E. (2008). Metaphoric identity mapping: Facilitating goal-setting and engagement in rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 18 (5–6), 713–741.Google Scholar