Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:15:50.735Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Assessment of Executive Functioning Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2012

Maria J. Hennessy*
Affiliation:
University of Sydney, Australia
Gina Geffen
Affiliation:
University of Queensland and Queensland Health, Australia
Gerard Pauley
Affiliation:
Hitchin Community Mental Health, UK
Tim Cutmore
Affiliation:
Griffith University, Australia
*
Address for correspondence: Maria Hennessy, Centre for the Mind, University of Sydney, The Quadrangle, A14, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The assessment of executive functioning 1 month following a mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) is minimal, inconsistent and difficult to integrate. Four executive processes of checking, inhibition, sharing and integrating were examined using an empirically derived assessment protocol based on executive process delineation (Baddeley & Della Sala, 1998). This protocol was administered to individuals at 1 month post-MTBI (n = 22), and a group of orthopaedic controls (n = 15) matched for age, sex, years of education and occupational status. Contrary to expectations, only one significant difference between the two groups occurred on the dual-task Telephone Search while Counting (p < .006), which was considered a measure of the executive process of sharing. Methodological limitations such as a small and heterogeneous sample may have influenced the findings in this study. The results provide support for the utility of a theoretically driven approach to executive functioning to aid the integration of neuropsychological results, and highlight the need for carefully controlled research at 1 month following a MTBI to further delineate the recovery process.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)