Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:31:42.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Women and Episcopal Power

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The quasi-episcopal jurisdiction held by abbesses over the ‘separated’ territories of exempt orders has been presented by some writers of today as an abuse. I am alluding to such authors as Giovanni Mongelli, who has written on the mitred abbesses of San Benedetto, Conversano, Italy, and José Maria Escriva, who has written on the abbesses of Las Huelgas de Burgos, Spain. Bath these abbeys, like very many others, received innumerable papal bulls in their favour confirming them in their independence of any bishop and accepting their civil and ecclesiastical jurisdiction. Although many religious orders in Europe lost exemption at the time of the French Revolution, the Abbey of Las Huelgas de Burgos, after a brief lapse of some eight years, continued to be exempt up till 1874. The system was brought to a close by Pius IX in a bull entitled Quae diversa addressed to all religious orders in Spain, both men and women. The reason given was that the system was no longer suitable to the changed social conditions.

Such a reason is plausible; but to consider the jurisdiction held by abbesses as an abuse is pure prejudice. Abbesses, like queens or empresses, had a right to rule when their position was officially accepted. Such a system was in keeping with early Christian custom, throughout the feudal period and up to the fall of the nobility at the time of the French Revolution.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1941 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

References

page 206 note 1 Rodriguez, Lopez, Amancio, El Real Monasterio de las Huelgas de Burgos y el Hospital del Rey (Burgos, 1907).

page 206 note 2 Holston, and Brochie, , Codex Regularum, Vol. II (1661).Google Scholar

page 206 note 3 P. G. 31. Rule No. 110, Col. 1158.

page 206 note 4 Mabillon, Annales I, p. 357; Jonas, Vita Columbanus.

page 206 note 5 G. Fabricius, Originum Illustrissimae Stirpis Saxonicae (1592), Books II, III and V.

page 207 note 1 Codex Steinfeld. London British Museum: Addit 21.105, fol. 175.

page 207 note 2 Marius Férotin, D., Le Liber Ordinum en usage dans l'église Wisigothique et Mozarabe d'Espagne (1904), Vol. V, p. 66.Google Scholar

page 207 note 3 Ex MS Liber Sacramentorum Moisacensi Monasterii Ordo ad Ordinandum Abbatem vel Abbatissam. Edit Marténe, de Antiquis Ecclesias Ritibus, Vol. II, pp. 452b., 429a.Google Scholar

page 207 note 4 See note 2.

page 207 note 5 Giovanni Mongelli, O.S.B., Le Abbadesse Mitrate di San Benedetto di Conversano, Montevergine, 1960, p. 96.

page 207 note 6 Sr. Techilde de Montessus, Insignia Abbatium (1956). Unpublished document in the archives of the Abbey of Notre Dame at Jouarre, B. n. 2 and MS 4.

page 207 note 7 Schultze, R. Das Adelige Frauen (Kanonissen) Stift der H1. Maria und Die Pfarre Liebfrauen Unberwasser zu Münster Westfalen (1952), p. 27.

page 207 note 8 Edmund E. Stengel, Die Grabschrift der ersten Abbtissin Von Quedlinberg. Deutsches Archives für Geschichte des Mittelalter 3. 1. Abt. (1890), p. 64.

page 208 note 1 Mansi, Vols. XXII and XIII.

page 208 note 2 Mansi, Vol. XIII, Col. 783.

page 208 note 3 Edit. J. E. Booty (1963).

page 208 note 4 Morea e Muciaccia, Le Pergamene di Conversano (Trani, 1942), p. 258.

page 208 note 5 John Ridley, John Knox, p. 268.

page 209 note 1 H. Nicquet, s.j. Histoire de L'Ordre de Fontevrault (1642), p. 218.

page 209 note 2 Poignant, Simone, L'abbaye de Fontevrault et Les Filles de Louis XV, p. 84 (1966).Google Scholar

page 209 note 3 L., Deviller, Chartres du Chapitre de Sainte Waudru de Mons, 2 Vols. (Brussels, 1899), Introduction xxxxi.Google Scholar