Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:03:49.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Vaughan Williams and the English Tradition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is curious how the leadership of the musical world has passed from one country to another. This is not always merely the result of fashion or of social causes: it really does appear that the muses are migratory. The commanding influence exerted by any country at one time has tended to swamp or, to change the metaphor, at least obscure the native art of others. One has only to think of the tremendous impact of Italian, and later of German, music in this country to realize this. So complete and far-reaching has the predominance been on occasion that an appearance of a truly international musical style has been given. This was never more clearly true than in the eighteenth century, when the process was aided by a social and aristocratic internationalism. Nevertheless, every nation has a characteristic musical tradition of its own, even though the tradition may sometimes only be traced with difficulty, being continued by a host of minor, forgotten composers. Thus, even in eighteenth-century England, which is popularly regarded as a locus classicus of a trough in a musical tradition, there were composers such as Boyce who spoke in unmistakably English accents.

What it is that causes and perpetuates national characteristics is a matter for conjecture. Rousseau attributed it to the influence, via song, of language; but, though there may be some truth in this, it is certainly an inadequate explanation. It is more important to give some account of what is meant by a national tradition, lest the cynic should suspect mere jingoism or an attempt to excuse second-rate music.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1954 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

References

1. ‘If we have no folk‐songs or none of any musical value, does it not follow that there is no music inborn in the nation? What, then, will be the use of all our institutions and associations for performing, teaching and fostering an art the very germs of which are not part of our nature?’—Quoted in Vaughan Williams by Percy M. Young. (London, 1953.)

2. The Music of Ralph Vaughan Williams, by Frank Howes. (Oxford University Press; 25s.)

3. Quoted in Young, op. cit.

4. This is not always true, however, and when folk‐songs come consciously to the fore (as in Hugh the Drover) the sentiments have a peculiar unreality—which only Lambert could abuse adequately—not so far removed from Ye Olde Tea Shoppe variety.

5. cf. ‘Vaughan Williams and Folk‐song’, by Elsie Payne in The Music Review of May, 1954.

6. Quoted in Young, op. cit.

7. Quoted in Young, op. cit.