No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Tradition of the Maries in Provence
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 September 2024
Extract
Few local traditions of evangelisation have been maintained with as much tenacity and defended with as much passion as that of the Bethany household and the Maries in Provence. Among Catholics of the modern dioceses of Marseilles, Aix, Avignon and Fréjus, which have succeeded the medieval dioceses of the same churches and those of Orange, Carpentras, Apt, Arles and Toulon, now divided between the four survivors, the belief that their province was christianised by these Gospel figures is held with conviction and is still a source of devotion. Whereas elsewhere the name and legend of the first bishop are only matters of archaeology, in Provence the memory of Lazarus and his sisters, of Mary Salome and Mary the mother of James, is a living one, honoured by novena, procession and pilgrimage in the crypt of St Victor’s abbey in Marseilles and in those of the churches of Tarascon, Saint-Maximin and Les Saintes Maries de la Mer, and in the cave sanctuary known as the Sainte-Baume.
The knowledge of this tradition comes generally as a surprise to English Catholics. Nevertheless, at least one episode of the series— that of Mary Magdalen’s penance in the Sainte-Baume—has been frequently reproduced in works of art and provides, indeed the usual setting for fifteenth to nineteenth century paintings of the saint. For the rocky background against which so many pictures of her are placed is that of the cave near Marseilles where she is alleged to have dwelt for thirty years, expiating her early life of sin.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1951 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers
References
1 Bahna means ‘cave’.
2 Monuments intdtis sur fapostolat de Marie‐Madeleine en Provence, two vols., Paris, 1848.
3 Acta Sanctorum, vol. 8, Oct., p. 29, T.LVI and vol. 9, Oct., p. 452, T.LVII; quoted by J. Escudier, L'EvangMisation primitive de la Provence, Toulon, 1929; P. 54‐
4 Month, Vol. XCII (1899), p.75Google Scholar; cf. Escudier, op. cit., p. 62.