Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-25T01:25:31.933Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Saint among the Theologians II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Extract

In a preceding paper, we were concerned to show firstly what was the real mind of the theologian, Bellarmine, concerning the theories and teaching of his confreres, Lessius and Molina; and, secondly, how his own treatise called Controversies came to be altered and mutilated in order to be brought in line to some extent with the new theories. In the following pages, which are concerned with some of the moves in the heated debate between Molinism and the traditional Thomism, it is necessary to bring into light certain activities of Bellarmine, when the theological consensus in Rome was becoming more and more convinced of the necessity for passing condemnation upon the dangerous ideas then being promulgated. The account will largely serve to reveal the zeal of obedience which Blessed Robert Bellarmine gave to his superiors, and the extent of his efforts to shield the good name of his fellow religious from public condemnation.

After the third examination of Molina’s Concordia by the commission appointed by the Holy See, approximately sixty different passages taken from that work, were reduced to twenty, in which the whole of the doctrine condemned as heretical, erroneous, temerarious, and dangerous, was compendiously gathered together. It is said by Fr. Brodrick (vol. ii, p. 55) that as the examinations of the Concordia increased in number, so the numbers of propositions condemned decreased;

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1928 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Itatics mine. Cf. Fuligatti and Petra-Sancta. Life of Bellamine (Lib. vi, cap. 7), ‘posse et velle non inficior; pronuntio tamen fore ut non definiat.’.

2 Both Bellarmine’s document and the reply of Lemos are given in extanso ia Strry’s History, pp. 479-483.

3 The documents both of Bellarmine and Lemos are in extenso in Serry’s History, pp. 508-9.

4 This rescript of Paul V is to be seen in the Acta of Cormel, Principal Secretary of the Congreg de Aux.

5 The Bull is given in extenso in Serry’s History, Appendix, PP. 155-175.

6 It is strange and significant that Fr. Brodrick mentions only one assembly of the Cardinals under Paul V, namely the second : he omits to record the first assembly wherein all the Cardinals, except Blessed Robert Bellarmine and Du Perron, voted for the condemnation of Molina’s doctrine. Moreover he omits to mention the political reason for the calling together of the second assembly, and he does not think fit to quote the words of Paul V, as recorded by Coronel, the principal secretary of the Congregation, ‘His maxime temporibus . . . ‘—’Seeing what turn events hum taken, would it be for the good of the Church to condemn Molina’s doctrine? ’

7 It is significant that, since the dispute, there has been no edition of the Concordia.