Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:42:09.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Russian Sophiology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Russian religious thought is experiencing an acute crisis. The mysticism which, in pre-revolutionary days, greatly interested certain Russian intellectual circles has now reached its full development among thinkers grouped around the Russian Orthodox Theological Institute in Paris; a “new school of theology” is even being spoken of. Occasionally this group has used the term neo-gnosis, or orthodox gnosis, to describe their particular mystical tendencies. There is no question of a rupture with the Orthodox Church, but of a broadening of her doctrinal teaching, by the introduction of conceptions purported to belong to her traditions, though discarded by the official Church. So, in the name of these traditions, Fr. Bulgakov, head of the Institute, expounds a so-called sophiological doctrine based upon the conception of a hypostatized divine Wisdom, idea (in the Platonic sense) of the creation co-etemal with the Creator.

This doctrine is taught in several important works of which The Light Undimmed was written before the author's ordination. Fr. Bulgakov has subsequently developed his thought in a number of books, mostly published in Paris: The Burning Bush, The Friend of the Bridegroom, The Ladder of Jacob, Icons and their Veneration, and especially The Lamb of God, which forms the first part of a work upon theandrism intended to epitomize the writer’s sophiological teaching. We must add an essay on Hypostasis and Hypostatisation published in Prague, also a series of articles in Putj, Russian philosophical periodical isued in Paris, some of which are noteworthy as they explain the writer’s intellectual evolution.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1937 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

Footnotes

1

Attention was recently called in Blackfriars (June, p. 379–380) to the importance of the “neognostic” movement in the. Orthodox Church which has already impressed English thinkers. We publish this authoritative article from the pen of a Dominican tertiary by courtesy of La Revue des Sciences Théologiques et Philosophiques. The present translation is by Olga Bennigsen.—Ed.

References

2 See address of Fr. Serge Bulgakov at the celebration of the tenth anniversary of the Institute (Putj, No. 47).

3 Translated into English as The Orthodox Church.

4 La Russie et l'Eglise universelle, chap. III, p. 223

5 Ibid. chap IV, p. 230.

6 Ibid. chap. IV, p. 235.

7 Ibid. chap. V. p. 241.

8 Russian edition of his Works, v. VI, pp. 364–418.

9 Whose Sophia was published in 1699.

10 The most important of these things being the research by the writer of this article (nom-de-plume Yury Nikolaev) The God-Seekers; Essay on the history of gnosticism. St. Petersburg, 1913 (Tr).

11 Putj. No. 21.

12 Hypostasis and hypostasation, p. 58.

13 Icons and their Veneration, p. 51.

14 The Eucharistic Dogma, in Putj, No. 21.

15 The Burning Bush, p. 64.

16 Review of The Lamb of God in Putj, No. 41.