Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-03T11:36:43.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Malines, 1921–1925

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Extract

The Holy Father’s lately-issued Encyclical with its clear statement of the doctrine of the unity of the Church based upon the primacy of jurisdiction of the See of Peter, comes as an opportune commentary upon the Report of the Malines Conversations now at last published. The plan of these Conversations was to proceed by way of affirmation—to bring forward the points upon which agreement could be reached and to shelve, at any rate for the time being, the attempt to come to any conclusions upon questions where there was likelihood of radical disagreement. As the Report proceeds we become increasingly conscious of the presence of a fundamental difference of outlook underlying such agreement as was reached. To the Anglican representatives the unity of the Body of Christ’ is something desirable but unattained ; to the Catholics it is an existing fact and a necessary presupposition. This is the crux of the whole question. The corporate union of the Church of England with the Holy See, the ultimate object envisaged by the Conversations, were it ever to come about, would not be the re-joining of two separated parts of the Body of Christ, it would be the uniting of a schismatic member to the one and indivisible Body.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1928 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 On Fostering True Religious Union. (Burns, Oates and Washbourne ; 2d.)

2 The Conversations at Malines, 1921–1925. (Oxford University Press ; 2/6.)

3 Not in the French version.

4 Speech by the Archbishop of Canterbury in the Upper House of Convocation, February 6th, 1924. App. II.