Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:18:46.049Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lawlessness, Law, and Sanction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The general contempt for law and the breakdown in the machinery for enforcing it suggest the need for a reconsideration of the principles which give to law its binding force. The very conditions which must prevail in organised society necessitate a social control which is exercised through law and upon which must rest an orderly arrangement as a groundwork of social peace. Peace in society is dependent on social unity. All things naturally crave peace based on order, and although man is by nature meek lawlessness and inflamed passion are capable of making him the worst of brutes. Hence reason dictates the necessity for rules of conduct to be followed by all. Individual inclination must sometimes be restricted and accommodated to the larger interests of society as a whole. St. Thomas therefore defines law as “a dictate of reason, given and promulgated for the common good by one who has charge of the community.” There are, besides statutory law, properly recognised customs which in defect or written law retain their binding force. The obligatory character of law is derived from the power to legislate vested in the representatives of the people, whose charge it is to make provision for the common interests of the society over which they rule. It is by legislation that just relationship is established between members of the state; and as all legislation should be dictated by justice and gives rise to reciprocal rights and duties, every just law has an ethical value. But a law which is unjust is no law, and does not merit obedience.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1938 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

Footnotes

1

A dissertation by Mariam Theresa Rooney, LL.B., A.B., A.M. The Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C.. 1937.

References

2 De Reg. Princip. I. I, C.2.

3 De divinis nominibus, Dionysii, XI, lect. I; Cfr.IIa IIae 29, II.

4 Ia IIae 46, v; IIa IIae 157.

5 Ia IIae, 95, I.

6 Summa Ia IIae, 95, II.

7 IIa IIae, 81, VIII. We note with regret that on p. 57 of the disrtation a passage from the Supplement of the Summa is cited and attributed to Reginald of Piperno. But the text in question is taken from the Commentary of St. Thomas on the fourth book of Sentences.

8 cfr. Encyclical Quas primas, December 11th, 1925.

9 Lawlessness, Law, and Sanction, p, 13.

10 Lawlessness, Law, and Sanction. p. 39.

11 Ibid., p. 16.

12 Ibid., p. 129.

13 Ibid., p. 145.

14 Common Sense in Law, by Paul Vinogradoff, p. 8.

15 Lawlessness, Law, and Sanction. p. 75.

16 Ibid., p. 84.