Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:34:46.135Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

L'Aube in the Evening

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is true, replied the Dutchman, we are a small people without a great future. But when early in the morning we hear a loud knocking at the door, we know it is only the milk.

The Times every morning and the New Statesman every week, those cover serious periodical reading for many of us. From them we should assume that the political weight of Catholicism has been thrown heavily to the right for the last hundred years. The association of Catholics with the forces of tradition is, of course, evident; this, at its worst, has meant subservience of vested interests, and, at its best, rallying with the stable and chivalrous elements of society. It is true that altar and throne, farm and nationality were the causes Catholics fought for most conspicuously in the nineteenth century, and that Liberalismus was, to put it mildly, not favourably regarded in the second period of Pio Nono’s pontificate. What is not so generally appreciated is the strength and official standing of the Labourite movement in the Church.

Père Lacordaire died, he said, an impenitent liberal, the Bishop Baron von Ketteler dug deeper to the roots of reform than did our own Victorian Radicals, and cardinals like Manning, Mermillod and Gibbons were scarcely daffodils that came before the sturzos dared. They were the leaders of a Catholic democratic movement that had reached such proportions by the time of the Europe of Locarno that the action of Catholic groups on the whole—I speak quantitatively—lay with Trade Unionism and Parliamentary Democracy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1939 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

References

1 For Democracy. By Barbara Barclay Carter, Joseph Clayton, Virginia M. Gawford, Angelo Crespi, S. J. Gosling, Alfredo Mendizábal, Anthony Moore, J. F. Neurohr, E. Roper Power, Luigi Sturzo, Louis Terrenoire, Maurice Vaussard. (Burns Oates, Pp. x, 237, 8s. 6d.). The essays are not scattered, but written to an ordered plan. First, the history of democracy is traced, from Athens and Rome, through Florence, to modem times. Then the doctrine is analyzed in the framework of morals and law. Finally its contemporary situation is appreciated. The book is recommended to all students of politics, and particularly to those who would see the bearings of the Church in the modern world. A clearer distinction between liberalism and democracy would have been helpful. One looks for, and finds, such touches as ‘the extermination of countless Abyssinians by gas, or the bombardment of open towns by Franco's aeroplanes,’ While organized liberty is authority, I would not agree that authority is organized liberty (p. 114). There is a misprint on p. 215, and Lacordaire was Henri‐Dominique (p. 235).