Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:12:28.502Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Husbandman of the Visible Universe

Responsibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Husbandman’ is the word; for, if not wholly adequate, as one word could hardly be, it does, better than any other, express man’s status and function in the universe, and especially in the visible universe, so that its immediate concrete sense and the analogies to which it gives rise are verified essentially and verified to the full. Whatever is verified essentially of mankind is verified in Adam, the head of this family, and in Christ in whom this headship is restored. We should beware of any kind of mere generalisation—even the generalisation, ‘All men are sinners,’ is made at a level quite different from that of such an essential judgment —and emphatically we must not be understood to mean ‘in fact men are most commonly tillers of the soil’. Man has the cosmic function of husbandman whether this last statement is verified or not. But then it follows that our meaning is deeper than the level of fact and of generalisations of fact.

We should note that the whole of the sub-human creation is ordained in and through man in the cosmic unity. The sub-human world is not fully a world and not fully a cosmos by itself. From it may be drawn suggestions of unity but not really a unity of its own. In man as part (head) of the visible creation, the visible world has a unity of which man is the guarantee and ‘sacrament’ (in the same sense in which it may be said the Pope is ‘sacrament’ of the Church’s unity).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1946 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

References

1 Such phrases are verified without embarrassment of man, understood absolutely, as he is to be encountered in the unfallen first parents of the race in the integrity of their nature as also in that restored integrity in Christ (where they apply by virtue not precisely of his Godhead, not precisely of the hypostatic union, but of the integrity of our nature restored in him). So also, by a special appropriateness due to her Immaculate Conception they apply to Mary.

2 We are here a hundred miles from the intellectual barbarism of modern ‘economies’. Economy is the ordering of the household: of man's microcosm of a domestic, physical and spiritual, personal and social household within the divine economy (cf. Irenaeus) of God's redemptive working in the world which is ‘cosmic’ as well as being ‘personal’ to man in the sense of modern spirituality.

3 C'était la plus délicate des priéres'. comments Pére Lagrange, á peine une suggestion. pas méme l‘expression d'un disir’.

4 Cfr. Ananda K. Coomaraswamy in a Wisdom parallel translated from Brhadaran‐yaka Upanisad I, 2, 1. ‘He, Self. manifested Light. Of Him as he shone were the Waters born. Verily whilst I shone, there was Delight’, said He. ‘This is the Sheen of Shining. Verily there is delight for him who knoweth thus the sheen of shining’. (A New Approach to the Vedas. Ananda K. Coomaraswamy, London 1933).