Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:23:17.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Art and its Integration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The last thing we are ever told about anything is who made it. Naturally, for what do makers matter in a world of ‘minders’?

The author of The Gothic World advances a half-hearted plea that a like technical indifference may explain medieval anonymity. He persuaded us more when in his former volume Gothic England he set out to deny the allegation altogether and to rid ‘le miracle occidental’ itself of ‘the plague of anonymity’. (Will no one rid us of the plague of notoriety?) In sober fact ‘from the period 1250-1550 a vast number of names survive. It would be no exaggeration to say that the men responsible for all the major developments of art in this period are already known to us by name.’

Mr John Harvey sets himself to answer four questions: ‘What, How, Where and When was Gothic Art?’ He has especially enthralling things to tell us about the ‘How’ and not least about medieval craftsmen, trassours and devysours, their lodges and guilds, their gear and skill. Coming pat at the moment when the swinging pendulum of controversy has come to rest at a point of equilibrium, his researches should greatly help to establish once and for all a true idea of the master-builders and of the vivid world of medieval craftsmen.

For Mr Harvey the master-mason is neither, according to the extreme folk-art view, just one of the lads’, nor, according to the opposite extreme, the irresponsible ‘artist’ he has been since the Renaissance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1951 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

Footnotes

1

The Gothic World, 1100–1600; A Survey of Architecture and Art, by John Harvey (Batsford; 30s.)

References

Studies of Italian Renaissance Sculpture, by W. R. Valentiner (Phaidon Press; 63s.) The Sculptures of Michelangelo, by Ludwig Goldschcider; second edition revised (Phaidon Press; 30s.)

2 Gothic England, A Survey of National Culture, 1300–1550 (Batsford, 1947.)

3 So scholarly a book should not lack a general index. In that to the illustrations the sculptor Agostino di Duccio is confused with Duccio the great Siencse painter. Still less should so sumptuous a volume harbour solecisms such as tire perdu (for perdue), conlroposto (passim for contropposto) and stucci (for stuuhi). Tolentino is known to hagiographers, though not as the name of a saint. Catastro and catastrale are unknown to lexicographers, English or Italian, though the Italian forms catasto, ‐ale, would fit the context. But why not property taxi It takes a bold writer to tackle the syntax of two languages at once, undeterred by a hybrid plural such as Pietàs or by unresolvable discords like were.. retardataire [sic]. The illustrations, chosen to comment on the text, are intrinsically beautiful.