Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-24T09:54:43.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Darwin Redivivus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Extract

A theologian is too conscientiously concerned with truth, even with physical truth, not to take a deep interest in the yearly meetings of the British Association. Especially does he interest himself in the Presidential Address, which is given with such an accepted sense of finality that it is not open to the discussion of the subsequent meetings. Part of the theologian’s almost exaggerated respect for this Presidential Address is his reverence for human reason when it flies, as Dryden says, at ‘its own quarry.’ Every theologian guides his thoughts by the profoundly humble wisdom of St. Thomas Aquinas. ‘Since Scripture can be explained in a multiplicity of senses, one should adhere to a particular explanation only in such measure as to be ready to abandon it if it be proved with certainty (certa ratione) to be false; lest Holy Scripture be exposed to the ridicule of unbelievers and an obstacle be placed to their believing’ The theologian’s failure to accept the assured findings of Science would be an infidelity not only to Science but also to Theology. Scientists who, as such, are not dealing with ethical categories can have no idea of the theologian’s concern to accept and assimilate every truth which comes to him with the ‘certa ratio’ —the certainty of a unanimous science.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1927 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Summa Theologica (Eng. trans.). Ia, Qu. 68, Art. I.

2 It is a great relief to find on the admission of Sir Arthur Keith that the scientists and theologians who returned a verdict ‘ Not Proven ’ on the Darwinism of Darwin’s days, were justified in reason and equity.

3 Sic I

4 Sic I