Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T18:22:40.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A UK-wide survey of speciality doctors and associate specialist (SAS) psychiatrists' psychotherapy case experience, barriers and benefits to professional development and clinical capabilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2021

Alina Vaida*
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
Masud Awal
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
*
*corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Research suggests that seeing psychotherapy cases benefits psychiatric trainees’ professional development and clinical capabilities, however there is lack of such evidence for SAS psychiatrists, who require this experience for Certificate of Eligibility for Specialist Registration (CESR) applications.

Having provided frequently requested psychotherapy training support to our Trust's CESR training programme in Birmingham we aimed to study nationwide SAS psychiatrists’ psychotherapy case experience, professional benefits and barriers to access.

Method

An online questionnaire was sent to UK-wide SAS Psychiatry doctors, with the support of the RCPsych Speciality Doctors and Associate Specialist Psychiatrists Committee (SASC), whilst being promoted on social media. It asked about psychotherapy-related experience, barriers and plans.

Result

122 doctors completed the questionnaire, estimated to constitute approximately 8% (or more if considering all vacancies) of SAS psychiatry posts based on the RCPsych Census (2015), from across all UK nations and regions.

23% had gained experience in delivering psychotherapy (57% of whom confirmed CESR or training application plans), seeing cases mainly in CBT (52%) and psychodynamic psychotherapy (41%). Those who had delivered psychotherapy agreed or strongly agreed that it helped them become a better listener (82%), become more empathetic (75%), enjoy work more (71%), understand the unconscious communication better (82%), be more confident about referring for psychotherapy (82%) and overall be a better psychiatrist (86%).

44% planned to start a psychotherapy case but had not started, of whom only 22% had identified a supervisor and 15% identified a case. Only 11% felt confident they could get the psychotherapy training experiences they needed. Barriers reported included it not being part of their job plan (70%), time constraints (57%), difficulties in accessing psychotherapy supervision (61%), difficulties in identifying suitable cases (32%) and limited knowledge about psychotherapy (30%).

Conclusion

Doctors who delivered psychotherapy reported benefits on many levels, making a strong case it develops their clinical capabilities, which may facilitate psychologically-informed care.

The results indicate interest in psychotherapy training outstripped available opportunity and support. Whilst some barriers mirrored those previously reported for trainees (difficulties accessing supervision and cases) others identified particularly related to SAS workload (not being part of their job plan and time constraints) and lack of support (with trainees prioritised). This may highlight a potential concern given the SAS Charter covers CESR-related support and advocates appropriate Supporting Professional Activities (SPA) time.

Trusts need to consider more actively supporting SAS psychotherapy training and including in job planning for those receiving, delivering and supporting these valued experiences.

Type
Education and Training
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.