Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 July 2023
The stopping over-medication of people with a learning disability, autism or both (STOMP) campaign was launched by NHS England in 2016 as part of the Transforming Care programme. It aims to reduce the inappropriate prescribing of psychotropic medication to manage challenging behaviour in the absence of a licenced indication. The current audit aimed to demonstrate adherence to national standards for STOMP within the community learning disability teams (CLDTs) of Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust. Additionally, a secondary aim was to compare current adherence to the previous audit undertaken in 2019.
Audit standards were derived from national guidance by the Royal College of Psychiatrists and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. The population was defined as all patients open to a CLDT prescriber (medical or non-medical) between April 2020 - March 2021. A multidisciplinary working group agreed inclusion and exclusion criteria before designing an electronic audit questionnaire. A random sample of 20% of patients from each of the three CLDTs (Bexley, Bromley & Greenwich) was generated. Data were collected between October and November 2021.
The clinical records of 111 patients were reviewed, 86 of whom met inclusion criteria. Of these, 65 patients were taking psychotropic medication and progressed to full auditing. Key findings were: 85% of patients on established psychotropics had a medication review within the previous 6 months, of which 100% were assessed for their response to treatment and 86% were assessed for side effects; 78% of patients had their capacity to consent to treatment documented and, of those lacking capacity, 81% had a best interests decision documented. All but one of these key findings demonstrated an improvement compared to the 2019 audit.
Overall, this 2021 audit demonstrates a substantial improvement since the previous audit in 2019. However, adherence to national standards continues to be below 100%. Dissemination of findings and an updated action plan are indicated before re-audit in 2023.
Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.
eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.