Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:14:25.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Recognition and Management of Depression in Adults With a Chronic Physical Health Problem in the Acute Medical Setting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Rebecca Murphy Lonergan*
Affiliation:
North Middlesex University Hospital, London, United Kingdom
Muhammed Mainuddin
Affiliation:
North Middlesex University Hospital, London, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

To compare current trust practice to NICE clinical guideline 91. To identify patients with a history of depression or chronic physical illness on admission to acute medical services. To assess such patients for evidence of new or ongoing depression and establish prevalence of depressive symptoms in high risk patient groups. To establish appropriate pathways for referral to mental health services

Methods

Cycle one: Eligible adult medical patients were screened for self-reported symptoms of low mood and anhedonia over the 2 weeks prior to admission. Inclusion criteria required patients to have either a past history of a chronic physical health condition or a past history of depression.

For those who answered “YES” to depressive symptoms, clinicians were prompted to refer to mental health services.

Intervention:

Screening questions were added to the adult medical clerking proforma for routine screening of admitted patients.

Patients self-identifying as depressed were triaged as requiring either inpatient liaison psychiatry team support or were referred to Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) team on discharge with GP follow up.

Acute Medical departmental teaching session held on CG91 and new referral pathway created with input from liaison psychiatry team.

Cycle two:

Audit cycle repeated, including audit of outcomes following identification of patients with depressive symptoms.

Results

In cycle one, of 123 patients, 90 were eligible for inclusion (PPHx depression n=39; PMHx chronic physical condition n=51).

Of those with a past history of depression, 85% reported YES to current symptoms.

Of patients with a chronic physical condition, without prior history of depression, 48% reported low mood or anhedonia in the past two weeks.

Following introduction of electronic screening questions, completion rate by clinicians was 65% (eligible patients n=102; PPHx depression n=43; PMHx chronic physical condition n=59). 44% of patients with a chronic physical health problem self-reported symptoms of depression.

After local educational meeting, 84% of identified patients had a planned referral to primary or secondary care for further mental health assessment and support.

Conclusion

Around half of patients with chronic physical health conditions self-report high levels of depressive symptoms, without a known mental health diagnosis or support in place.

Screening of patients on admission provides an opportunity for appropriate intervention.

Establishing clear referral pathways and ongoing education is needed to ensure all identified patients are referred for further assessment.

Type
Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.